Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 6:28:21 GMT
Tell me then what is the difference between 'Parasitic' and 'cannibalistic'? Work sets you free. Do you deny that it was a Nazi slogan? Therefore it must have a sinister meaning , right? You are pursuing a semantic argument to nowhere. "The original iron sign bearing the Nazi slogan "Arbeit Macht Frei" (German for "Work Shall Set You Free") that spanned the main entrance to the former Auschwitz death camp has been found, Polish police say". Note the words -"death camp". Or are you seriously saying that if prisoners in Auschwitz worked really hard the Nazis released them?😔
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 29, 2023 6:37:53 GMT
Ah, that explains everything then.😒 Yup...It covers it all dead nag.
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Apr 29, 2023 7:24:21 GMT
That's a good question and I don't know why Sir Mark Rowley hasn't been asked it. He wouldn't have an answer. But The comparison with Hitler's treatment of Jews is inappropriate. For a start we're not trying to kill the boat migrants. The trouble here is that the English language has been abused so much that it's hard to talk rationally about it. Muslims are not a "race" of course, but Jews are also not technically a separate race - they're part of the white race, though I suspect Hitler regarded them as a separate race. The rule of law (in the UK) is that people cannot be discriminated against because of their religion (a protected characteristic). But you can criticise a religion as we scrapped the law against blasphemy some years ago. So we can't ban muslim immigration - and neither can the USA. Trump plainly wanted to stop muslim immigration but it would violate the American Constitution so instead he tried to ban immigration from countries that sponsor terrorism - which is pretty much the same thing. But I think the courts struck that down too - in fact Obama also tried to do this. So Jenrick talks about damaging "cultural cohesiveness" and importing "different lifestyles" when what he means is that we don't want muslims because Islam is incompatible with a tolerant society - but that would be an offence. It's an anomaly in the law that people are free to follow a religion even if its beliefs are toxic (and deeply racist) but if a person has an ideology that he doesn't like people who follow Islam (because of their beliefs) he can be arrested for discriminating against people for a protected characteristic. Which makes no sense. My personal opinion is that beliefs (religious or not) should not be a protected characteristic. It should be perfectly legal to discriminate against people if they follow a religion that breaks our laws - which Islam does on many counts. It is the language being used by our government to describe people fleeing oppression, torture and war that is being compared, criminals, cannibalising, illegals, destroying our culture, invasion, jetting refugees to Rwanda in body restraints the list goes on.
1. The boat people are NOT refugees. They're coming from a safe country (France). 2. They are illegal because our law makes their method of entry to the UK illegal. 3. So they are criminals because of their method of entry. 4. I'm not sure I've seen the called cannibalistic. 5. The muslims (and most are muslims) are most certainly destroying our culture. Most of them want to make sharia law the law of the UK. And in certain parts of the country they're already enforcing it. Ask Salman Rushdie and the teacher who tried to talk about free speech. Go to a muslim country and see how the treat non-muslims - most have been driven out and many churches have been destroyed. 6. "Invasion" is the correct word. Thousands of illegal immigrants arrive each month - some of whom are deliberately displaced from their home country with the express purpose of increasing the muslim population of the West. And they're outbreeding the indigenous population by about 2 to 1. The population of muslims in the UK has been nearly doubling every 10 years (according to the Census). This is an invasion - and the militant muslims have admitted that this is what they're doing - to set up a caliphate. 7. No one has been sent to Rwanda, but if it's shown to be legal it will happen. As soon as the illegals know that they'll be deported the boats will stop. Make no mistake, if we don't deal with this invasion England will be lost. Many areas are already like Pakistan - Luton, Leicester etc.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 29, 2023 9:23:56 GMT
Work sets you free. Do you deny that it was a Nazi slogan? Therefore it must have a sinister meaning , right? You are pursuing a semantic argument to nowhere. "The original iron sign bearing the Nazi slogan "Arbeit Macht Frei" (German for "Work Shall Set You Free") that spanned the main entrance to the former Auschwitz death camp has been found, Polish police say". Note the words -"death camp". Or are you seriously saying that if prisoners in Auschwitz worked really hard the Nazis released them?😔 Wooosh over your head again. You are cherry picking words, claiming they are Nazi rhetoric and ( ffs) implying they are a sign of a slippery slope to Nazism. Cannibalised becomes parasite somewhere between your ears because YOU claim that you don’t see the difference . It doesn’t matter whether the Germans would of released them or not , that’s what they said. So you are picking words that Braverman said and changing them into ‘ Nazi’ rhetoric words that she didn’t say ffs. What you are doing is as stupid and dishonest as claiming the words ‘ work sets you free ‘ is Nazi rhetoric . I can’t make it any simpler for you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 17:02:20 GMT
"The original iron sign bearing the Nazi slogan "Arbeit Macht Frei" (German for "Work Shall Set You Free") that spanned the main entrance to the former Auschwitz death camp has been found, Polish police say". Note the words -"death camp". Or are you seriously saying that if prisoners in Auschwitz worked really hard the Nazis released them?😔 Wooosh over your head again. You are cherry picking words, claiming they are Nazi rhetoric and ( ffs) implying they are a sign of a slippery slope to Nazism. Cannibalised becomes parasite somewhere between your ears because YOU claim that you don’t see the difference . It doesn’t matter whether the Germans would of released them or not , that’s what they said. So you are picking words that Braverman said and changing them into ‘ Nazi’ rhetoric words that she didn’t say ffs. What you are doing is as stupid and dishonest as claiming the words ‘ work sets you free ‘ is Nazi rhetoric . I can’t make it any simpler for you. You asked me if the slogan had a sinister meaning, I showed you that it did but still you deny it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 29, 2023 17:08:10 GMT
Wooosh over your head again. You are cherry picking words, claiming they are Nazi rhetoric and ( ffs) implying they are a sign of a slippery slope to Nazism. Cannibalised becomes parasite somewhere between your ears because YOU claim that you don’t see the difference . It doesn’t matter whether the Germans would of released them or not , that’s what they said. So you are picking words that Braverman said and changing them into ‘ Nazi’ rhetoric words that she didn’t say ffs. What you are doing is as stupid and dishonest as claiming the words ‘ work sets you free ‘ is Nazi rhetoric . I can’t make it any simpler for you. You asked me if the slogan had a sinister meaning, I showed you that it did but still you deny it. Do the slogan ‘ work sets you free’ has a sinister meaning ? Work doesn’t set you free? You claimed a word that a minister did not say was Nazi rhetoric but still applied it to the minister . No wonder you are confused .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 17:08:16 GMT
It is the language being used by our government to describe people fleeing oppression, torture and war that is being compared, criminals, cannibalising, illegals, destroying our culture, invasion, jetting refugees to Rwanda in body restraints the list goes on.
1. The boat people are NOT refugees. They're coming from a safe country (France). 2. They are illegal because our law makes their method of entry to the UK illegal. 3. So they are criminals because of their method of entry. 4. I'm not sure I've seen the called cannibalistic. 5. The muslims (and most are muslims) are most certainly destroying our culture. Most of them want to make sharia law the law of the UK. And in certain parts of the country they're already enforcing it. Ask Salman Rushdie and the teacher who tried to talk about free speech. Go to a muslim country and see how the treat non-muslims - most have been driven out and many churches have been destroyed. 6. "Invasion" is the correct word. Thousands of illegal immigrants arrive each month - some of whom are deliberately displaced from their home country with the express purpose of increasing the muslim population of the West. And they're outbreeding the indigenous population by about 2 to 1. The population of muslims in the UK has been nearly doubling every 10 years (according to the Census). This is an invasion - and the militant muslims have admitted that this is what they're doing - to set up a caliphate. 7. No one has been sent to Rwanda, but if it's shown to be legal it will happen. As soon as the illegals know that they'll be deported the boats will stop. Make no mistake, if we don't deal with this invasion England will be lost. Many areas are already like Pakistan - Luton, Leicester etc. 1, We've done that, it is legal for any asylum seeker to pass through any safe country to arrive at a destination of their choosing. 2. So why are they not arrested, answer: it is not illegal. 3. As above. 4. They do not want to make Sharia law the law of the UK that is just scaremongering, they would have to have a dominant political party to achieve that. 5. Conspiracy theorist claptrap. 6. Rwanda will not happen unless we leave the international agencies that oppose it, is that what you want?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 29, 2023 17:11:02 GMT
You asked me if the slogan had a sinister meaning, I showed you that it did but still you deny it. Do the slogan ‘ work sets you free’ has a sinister meaning ? Work doesn’t set you free? You claimed a word that a minister did not say was Nazi rhetoric but still applied it to the minister . No wonder you are confused . For God's sake it was written above the entrance to a Nazi forced labour death camp, are you trying to be stupid? I did not say anything was Nazi rhetoric, I said similar. Words have consequences.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 29, 2023 17:16:20 GMT
Do the slogan ‘ work sets you free’ has a sinister meaning ? Work doesn’t set you free? You claimed a word that a minister did not say was Nazi rhetoric but still applied it to the minister . No wonder you are confused . For God's sake it was written above the entrance to a Nazi forced labour death camp, are you trying to be stupid? I did not say anything was Nazi rhetoric, I said similar. Words have consequences. So the phrase’ work makes you independent’ is Nazi rhetoric because the words ‘ work sets you free’ was written above a Nazi forced labour camp? Anyone who says that work makes you independent’ is a Nazi?…this is the idiocy that you get when you cherry pick words and claim that they are Nazi rhetoric. Your kind of idiocy .
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Apr 29, 2023 18:12:34 GMT
Do the slogan ‘ work sets you free’ has a sinister meaning ? Work doesn’t set you free? You claimed a word that a minister did not say was Nazi rhetoric but still applied it to the minister . No wonder you are confused . For God's sake it was written above the entrance to a Nazi forced labour death camp, are you trying to be stupid? I did not say anything was Nazi rhetoric, I said similar. Words have consequences. If words align with actuality then the consequences are realistically immaterial. I understand fully that what is truth is a matter of opinion but then none of us hold the complete knowledge of truth. If Braverman uses accurate language to describe a situation then that is perfectly reasonable just as you may wish to use accurate language to describe a situation. Too often we see politicians telling outright lies and this is often backed up by the MSM.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2023 5:58:33 GMT
For God's sake it was written above the entrance to a Nazi forced labour death camp, are you trying to be stupid? I did not say anything was Nazi rhetoric, I said similar. Words have consequences. So the phrase’ work makes you independent’ is Nazi rhetoric because the words ‘ work sets you free’ was written above a Nazi forced labour camp? Anyone who says that work makes you independent’ is a Nazi?…this is the idiocy that you get when you cherry pick words and claim that they are Nazi rhetoric. Your kind of idiocy . Where did independent come from, I haven't used it I can't spell it.🤣
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2023 6:06:19 GMT
Everyone in the world has a special right to break into the UK and anyone who disagrees is a racist and a Nazi who wants to build death camps.
That's the left-wing argument, which is repeated everyday.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2023 6:28:02 GMT
Everyone in the world has a special right to break into the UK and anyone who disagrees is a racist and a Nazi who wants to build death camps. That's the left-wing argument, which is repeated everyday. And the right-wing argument is to over elaborate and sensationalise. "everyone in the world" is a ridiculous statement. "break in" suggests all asylum seekers are criminals. Just because you disagree does not make you a racist unless you know something we don't. No one has suggested anyone wants to build death camps unless you know something we don't.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 30, 2023 6:45:14 GMT
Everyone in the world has a special right to break into the UK and anyone who disagrees is a racist and a Nazi who wants to build death camps. That's the left-wing argument, which is repeated everyday. Anyone who speaks for the individual rights of the UK electorate is a Nazi don't you know, this is now how crazy their politics has become.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 30, 2023 7:12:11 GMT
Everyone in the world has a special right to break into the UK and anyone who disagrees is a racist and a Nazi who wants to build death camps. That's the left-wing argument, which is repeated everyday. Anyone who speaks for the individual rights of the UK electorate is a Nazi don't you know, this is now how crazy their politics has become. Do you realise how silly you sound?
|
|