Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2023 8:26:59 GMT
Don't talk silly, even if you are repeating yourself, nobody is suggesting asylum seekers are eating people. I didn't say it was, unfortunately a lot of loony far right whingers don't and they will take a 'tory' at its word. Then what on earth is the problem? You do not understand yet? It is the 'language' used to describe human beings that is the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 1, 2023 8:28:15 GMT
Then what on earth is the problem? You do not understand yet? It is the 'language' used to describe human beings that is the problem. Who? yours or them?oh the fricking irony. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 1, 2023 8:37:49 GMT
Are Albanians asylum seekers in the true sense of the word,is it a country at war so unsafe that they need our protection or is the asylum system being exploited. I know the answer do you? And I’m not right wing nor a nazi sympathiser as you call anyone who disagrees with you but I do know when this country is being taken for a ride. www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/asylum-seeker-mum-hits-out-26812378Albanians are being fast tracked back to Albania. What you are doing is looking at a certain section of those coming to this country and implying that they are all the same. I have never called anyone a "Nazi sympathiser", you are lying No I’m not lying and they’re no being fast tracked back. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 1, 2023 8:42:27 GMT
Then what on earth is the problem? You do not understand yet? It is the 'language' used to describe human beings that is the problem. The language as I have just said is sound as it is describing what happens when an influx of one culture meets another. An MP and/or a Minister should expect a basic understanding of English in those to whom he is talking and should expect that when he uses the word 'cannibalise' then it is incumbent on the listener to draw the sense he means from it. What you wish is to control the language so that only the left can use language of any nuance they so wish and everyone else has to use neutral language. If the Labour Party, and those further left, can use words like scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty to describe human interchange then 'cannibalise' is a pretty innocuous offering. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 1, 2023 11:42:06 GMT
You are posting waffle . ‘ Work makes you FREE ‘ is the closer to “ Work makes you independent’ than Cannibal is to Parasite. Independent..free from outside control; not subject to another's authority. Free..able to act or be done as one wishes; not under the control of another Cannibal..noun. a person who eats human flesh, especially for magical or religious purposes, as among certain tribal peoples. any animal that eats its own kind. adjective. pertaining to or characteristic of a cannibal. Parasite ..organism that lives in or on an organism of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other's expense. You either need a new dictionary or a few simple biology lessons 😁 The fact is neither are true. The Nazis never freed anyone from Auschwitz and asylum seekers are not cannibalising our culture, another link to Nazi rhetoric, they and the Tories lie. Doesn’t matter if they are true or not. Works makes you independent is closer to the phrase ‘ work makes you free than ‘ cannibalise ‘ is to ‘ parasite’. Therefore the claim that the phrase ‘ work makes you independent’ amounts to Nazi rhetoric is more valid than your stupid claim that “ cannibalise’ is Nazi rhetoric. Im am merely pointing out how ridiculous and dishonest your claim is. Your repeated attempts to move the goalposts doesnt help you either.😁 |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2023 15:40:13 GMT
You do not understand yet? It is the 'language' used to describe human beings that is the problem. Who? yours or them?oh the fricking irony. The Tories are determined to make asylum seekers 'the enemy' and keep the right wing in the UK occupied. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2023 15:41:32 GMT
Albanians are being fast tracked back to Albania. What you are doing is looking at a certain section of those coming to this country and implying that they are all the same. I have never called anyone a "Nazi sympathiser", you are lying No I’m not lying and they’re no being fast tracked back. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2023 15:46:13 GMT
You do not understand yet? It is the 'language' used to describe human beings that is the problem. The language as I have just said is sound as it is describing what happens when an influx of one culture meets another. An MP and/or a Minister should expect a basic understanding of English in those to whom he is talking and should expect that when he uses the word 'cannibalise' then it is incumbent on the listener to draw the sense he means from it. What you wish is to control the language so that only the left can use language of any nuance they so wish and everyone else has to use neutral language. If the Labour Party, and those further left, can use words like scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty to describe human interchange then 'cannibalise' is a pretty innocuous offering. Did the use "scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty" vulnerable asylum seekers? Lets face it the Tories are appalling with their use of language, here are some 'enemies of the people'. Judges. Lefty lawyers. The civil service, Railway workers. Nurses. Teachers. Doctors. Protesters. Not an exhaustive list, just of the top of my head. |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on May 1, 2023 15:46:28 GMT
Who? yours or them?oh the fricking irony. The Tories are determined to make asylum seekers 'the enemy' and keep the right wing in the UK occupied. Sure if you say so, I bet they are playing to your prejudices though as you cannot tell the difference between an asylum seeker and an illegal immigrant. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on May 1, 2023 15:46:41 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 1, 2023 16:43:35 GMT
The language as I have just said is sound as it is describing what happens when an influx of one culture meets another. An MP and/or a Minister should expect a basic understanding of English in those to whom he is talking and should expect that when he uses the word 'cannibalise' then it is incumbent on the listener to draw the sense he means from it. What you wish is to control the language so that only the left can use language of any nuance they so wish and everyone else has to use neutral language. If the Labour Party, and those further left, can use words like scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty to describe human interchange then 'cannibalise' is a pretty innocuous offering. Did the use "scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty" vulnerable asylum seekers? Lets face it the Tories are appalling with their use of language, here are some 'enemies of the people'. Judges. Lefty lawyers. The civil service, Railway workers. Nurses. Teachers. Doctors. Protesters. Not an exhaustive list, just of the top of my head. The point is if you wish to inhabit the moral high ground then you must live that life. If you step down to engage in linguistic fisticuffs in a tit for tat fashion then you lose that moral position. As regards 'asylum seekers' the public are only too aware it is a bit of a game all round and are increasingly annoyed that our government cannot get to grips with it. They are beginning to suspect, and in fact believe, that it is a deliberate policy to what end goodness knows. There is no sense to it when aligned with our net zero programme. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 1, 2023 17:00:21 GMT
The language as I have just said is sound as it is describing what happens when an influx of one culture meets another. An MP and/or a Minister should expect a basic understanding of English in those to whom he is talking and should expect that when he uses the word 'cannibalise' then it is incumbent on the listener to draw the sense he means from it. What you wish is to control the language so that only the left can use language of any nuance they so wish and everyone else has to use neutral language. If the Labour Party, and those further left, can use words like scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty to describe human interchange then 'cannibalise' is a pretty innocuous offering. Did the use "scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty" vulnerable asylum seekers? Lets face it the Tories are appalling with their use of language, here are some 'enemies of the people'. Judges. Lefty lawyers. The civil service, Railway workers. Nurses. Teachers. Doctors. Protesters. Not an exhaustive list, just of the top of my head. Without deviation, insinuation and denigration Right-Wingers / Tories would expose themselves as little more than useless politically inept and politically misguided nuisances. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 1, 2023 17:02:49 GMT
Did the use "scum, attack, stolen, brutal, cruel, inhumane, trash, torpedo, feud, dirty" vulnerable asylum seekers? Lets face it the Tories are appalling with their use of language, here are some 'enemies of the people'. Judges. Lefty lawyers. The civil service, Railway workers. Nurses. Teachers. Doctors. Protesters. Not an exhaustive list, just of the top of my head. Nonsense ^^^. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 1, 2023 17:07:54 GMT
The point is if you wish to inhabit the moral high ground then you must live that life. If you step down to engage in linguistic fisticuffs in a tit for tat fashion then you lose that moral position. Nonsense ^^^. So one can advocate a moral stance in language but take a non moral stance in one'sown use of language. I sense a bit of hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 1, 2023 17:20:08 GMT
So one can advocate a moral stance in language but take a non moral stance in one'sown use of language. I sense a bit of hypocrisy. You are just playing with words, one can have a justifiable high moral stance without being perfect. As the old Roman saying goes, ' perfection is for the Gods'  |
|
