|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 6, 2023 17:15:11 GMT
If they are on a floating barge surely you can anchor that up anywhere - how about Taransay island in the Outer Hebrides?. Totally uninhabited so you are not going to piss off any locals. Can't. It's privately owned. Easily solved... The Compulsory Purchase of Land Regulations 1990
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 6, 2023 17:19:35 GMT
Can't. It's privately owned. Easily solved... The Compulsory Purchase of Land Regulations 1990 That only pertains to England and Wales. 1990 No. 613 ACQUISITION OF LAND, ENGLAND AND WALES www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1990/613/made
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 6, 2023 17:34:54 GMT
My error..
Acquisition of Land (Authorisation Procedure) (Scotland) Act 1947
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 6, 2023 17:50:01 GMT
My error.. Acquisition of Land (Authorisation Procedure) (Scotland) Act 1947 How would you persuade the Scots to invoke that?
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Apr 6, 2023 21:13:21 GMT
Lineker's tweet "There is no huge influx. We take far fewer refugees than other major European countries. This is just an immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s, and I’m out of order?" Nowhere in that tweet does it say "let them all in" as you suggested, you lied. So the 'migrants/asylum seekers' are calling him 'Gary our hero' because he opposes illegal migrants ... you talk crap. You've been caught out making stuff up on this forum again. It's tedious.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 6, 2023 21:15:52 GMT
My error.. Acquisition of Land (Authorisation Procedure) (Scotland) Act 1947 How would you persuade the Scots to invoke that? Westminster is Sovereign - the Scots will do as they are told. ...they found that out last month at the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 6, 2023 21:22:08 GMT
So the 'migrants/asylum seekers' are calling him 'Gary our hero' because he opposes illegal migrants ... you talk crap. You've been caught out making stuff up on this forum again. It's tedious. This coming from a poster who tried to belittle me by laughing @ me saying there was only 3 syllables in the word 'everyone'..
Do you really want us to keep going there?
you are one of the biggest bullshiter's on this site.
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Apr 6, 2023 21:22:57 GMT
The law uses in the first instance "The Law" as written, in the second instance, law then uses precedence, due diligence and common sense or logical interpretation. An Asylum Seeker is an Asylum Seeker from the very moment that they declare they are an Asylum Seeker, usualy to a representative of the government, or an official. This means a Police Officer, an Immigration Officer, a Customs Officer, a Coastguard officer etc. If a refugee is to be arrested for illegal entry, we assume that the arrest will be made by either an Immigration Officer or a Police Officer, but upon confronting such an officer, a refugee will then declare that they are here to seek asylum. I repeat again - that International Law which the UK is party to, seems to contradict the governments new Immigration Bill. If this ridiculous government wish to make crossing the Channel Illegal, thereby barring such people from claiming asylum, then they need to consider removing the UK from the treaty. A couple of years ago the police and border force raided an Indian restaurant and grabbed several workers who had been working there for months. Some shrieked "Asylum" and were accepted as seekers; do you think that's right? No. Several months is not a reasonable time to leave it. I bet they were unsuccessful in their application.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Apr 6, 2023 22:17:20 GMT
You've been caught out making stuff up on this forum again. It's tedious. This coming from a poster who tried to belittle me by laughing @ me saying there was only 3 syllables in the word 'everyone'..
Do you really want us to keep going there?
you are one of the biggest bullshiter's on this site.
I apologised for that. I've never made anything up on here though.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 6, 2023 22:57:00 GMT
How would you persuade the Scots to invoke that? Westminster is Sovereign - the Scots will do as they are told. ...they found that out last month at the Supreme Court. Quite right, well said.
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 6, 2023 23:54:09 GMT
Westminster is Sovereign - the Scots will do as they are told. ...they found that out last month at the Supreme Court. Quite right, well said. Given that the Scots have their own Acquisition of Land Act, this must be a devolved matter, one in which Westminster should not meddle.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 7, 2023 0:01:11 GMT
Given that the Scots have their own Acquisition of Land Act, this must be a devolved matter, one in which Westminster should not meddle. Who cares, the bottom line is the SNP cant do anything without permission from Westminster. But tbh, the SNP have bigger problems to worry about.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Apr 7, 2023 7:31:36 GMT
Hey, maybe we could have the mooring ropes slip in the night and have the barge slip away to Calais where staff could throw the buggers over the side ….
Or better still rock up at the Gold Coast and give them a map of the walking route to Rwanda …
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 7, 2023 7:41:26 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ripley on Apr 7, 2023 14:52:10 GMT
Given that the Scots have their own Acquisition of Land Act, this must be a devolved matter, one in which Westminster should not meddle. Who cares, the bottom line is the SNP cant do anything without permission from Westminster. But tbh, the SNP have bigger problems to worry about. Devolution confers the right for Scottish law to decide on this matter. In any case, assuming that Westminster could send illegals to an island in Scotland, why would they choose this one, which is uninhabited? Are you really saying that illegals should be sent somewhere where there are no amenities or services at all?
|
|