Any chance of an apology?

Yes, migrants from the EU were overwhelmingly white.  You know that; I know that.  But what you don't know or worse, what you don't want to know is that there are native British people who define white as English, Nordic, Northern, Western European.  I've met a few -- worked with them, too -- who who would say things like "Polish people may be white skinned but they're not proper white -- they're from the East."  And don't tell me that that odious BNP guy, Griffin, voted to remain.  Please.

As for your silly argument about expelling all non-whites from the UK: It's just you, isn't?  Only in your head.  That's not my argument.  Neither is it Alibhai-Brown's point.  This is what "that silly cow" said about Leave voters:  "Some were racists and hoped that after the vote the nation would go all white."  You just spun it like crazy now you're dazed and confused.

Yeah, of course, you would like to explore that first.  The construction and hospitality industries have been gasping for air and you want to wait for the "economically inactive" to decide whether it is more gainful for them to work as labourers or to continue to collect their benefits cheques.

The head that is twisted is seated on your shoulders.
Why would she make such a comment if she wasn’t claiming that there was a significant amount of leavers who hoped that the UK would go ‘ all white’ ( sic).?
You should learn the difference between a ‘ significant number’  and ‘all’. One I posted and the other one was a pathetic false claim by you .
Come back when you find out .
Don’t project you “ seriously faulty “ ( sic) at me .

I enclosed the term economically inactive in quotation marks to refer to spongers specifically not to benefits claimants in general.  Obviously, you missed that point by a 100 miles so I hope it's all now clear in your head?

Don't be ludicrous -- nobody is profiting from young naive migrants.  Where do you get all these stupid ideas from, anyway?  Nick Griffin School of Race Relations?

You…the "economically inactive" to decide whether it is more gainful for them to work as labourers or to continue to collect their benefits cheques.

You need to learn to read. I said a ‘ significant number’ not benefits claimants in general. You seem to make a habit of making false claims.
I hope that clear in your disingenuous head .
You are. Employers using naive young migrants who are ignorant and or indifferent to safe work practices are social parasites .
You seem to be obsessed by Nick Griffin . I’m not surprised.

I’m not confused . Certainly not about you . Significant number is a number significant enough to comment about …not  ‘all’ ( which is your false claim.
Meanwhile one of the lefties who thinks that some people who claim benefits could work instead is upset that he has lost a stream of cheap Labour .
Social parasites , I think I said .