|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 27, 2023 20:22:40 GMT
Where did he say ‘ everyone’? When he claimed that a Daily Express report of demonstrators outside a hotel refuted Andrew's claim about everyone's views. Oh, then the protests outside illegal migrant hotels is just a figment of our imaginations then? So he didn’t then . Thanks .👍 |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 27, 2023 20:34:20 GMT
Those who have been paying attention know I never claimed he specifically used the word but that he was specifically referring to it
And I asked FS if he needed the word explained. As the quoted posts shows he very much did. It would have been a minor point but to FS anyone questioning what he sees as the great FS is an excuse for C word abuse * and generally throwing toys out of the pram.
* now removed by moderator action
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 27, 2023 20:43:51 GMT
Those who have been paying attention know I never claimed he specifically used the word but that he was specifically referring to it And I asked FS if he needed the word explained. As the quoted posts shows he very much did. It would have been a minor point but to FS anyone questioning what he sees as the great FS is an excuse for C word abuse * and generally throwing toys out of the pram. * now removed by moderator action Andrew..Please don't imagine that the Daily Mail is representative of everyone's views. They are not even representative of every Conservative MP. FS..Oh, then the protests outside illegal migrant hotels is just a figment of our imaginations then? I take that as FS saying that a lot of people have that view but as you are the self appointed expert of what other people think and post then you must be right . 👍 |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 27, 2023 20:50:45 GMT
It's technically ambiguous whether Fair endorsed 'everyone' in his response - but only technically ambiguous
It is far, far more likely he didn't.
So, after Fair issued a correction, it's odd someone would pursue the matter for pages, insisting this was the only possible interpretation
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 27, 2023 21:08:02 GMT
It's technically ambiguous whether Fair endorsed 'everyone' in his response - but only technically ambiguousIt is far, far more likely he didn't. So, after Fair issued a correction, it's odd someone would pursue the matter for pages, insisting this was the only possible interpretation You saying he corrected that 'Oh, then the protests outside illegal migrant hotels is just a figment of our imaginations then?' The record says not |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 27, 2023 21:13:38 GMT
It's technically ambiguous whether Fair endorsed 'everyone' in his response - but only technically ambiguousIt is far, far more likely he didn't. So, after Fair issued a correction, it's odd someone would pursue the matter for pages, insisting this was the only possible interpretation You saying he corrected that 'Oh, then the protests outside illegal migrant hotels is just a figment of our imaginations then?' The record says not You had a interpretation and he corrected you. He didn't need to correct himself because it was a matter of interpretation - ie he didn't explicitly say everyone. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 27, 2023 21:14:31 GMT
It's technically ambiguous whether Fair endorsed 'everyone' in his response - but only technically ambiguousIt is far, far more likely he didn't. So, after Fair issued a correction, it's odd someone would pursue the matter for pages, insisting this was the only possible interpretationNot if you knew the “ someone “. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 27, 2023 22:10:33 GMT
You saying he corrected that 'Oh, then the protests outside illegal migrant hotels is just a figment of our imaginations then?' The record says not You had a interpretation and he corrected you. He didn't need to correct himself because it was a matter of interpretation - ie he didn't explicitly say everyone. I suggest you read the record instead of imagining one |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 28, 2023 6:51:27 GMT
You had a interpretation and he corrected you. He didn't need to correct himself because it was a matter of interpretation - ie he didn't explicitly say everyone. I suggest you read the record instead of imagining one Rubbish, FS had already corrected your interpretation to andrewbrown on page 2. andrewbrown then dropped the point once FS had corrected his interpretation, and only returned to the discussion to incorrectly laugh at FS for saying there are 4 syllables in the word 'everyone'. You on the other hand continued on with your pettiness over the next 4 pages even though FS had corrected both yours and andrewbrown's interpretation of his post. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 28, 2023 7:30:44 GMT
Some basic facts for the not very bright ( Boris supporters )
The ECHR stands for the European Convention for Human Rights
It has nothing to do with the United Nations or the European Union
Almost all of Europe are signatories of the ECHR, except for Belarus and Russia ( whach speaks volumes )
The ECHR was born out of the Council of Europe, and the UK was a founding member
The ECHR has been successfuly used many thousands of times by people in this country to fight for such things as fair treatment at work, employment rights, equal pay and against discrimination.
There is not a majority in the House of Commons to repeal the ECHR, and any attempt by the government would bring about a massive rebellion and backlash by Conservative MPs who would side with Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems.
The ECHR is part of what makes Britain a civilised country, and the Tory populists have no chance of removing it from the statute books.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 28, 2023 7:31:00 GMT
So Buccaneer you want to drag this on do you?
FS asked me a question, I answered it and then he launched into abusive posting incl calling me the C word. His 'everyone does not think like me' doesn't actually address my original challenge to where he claimed that a demo outside a hotel refutes the point that the Daily Mail doesn't speak for everyone. A claim he still hasn't corrected.
I walked away from the thread only to find that he and Jonksy had continued to throw insults against me so eventually I replied.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 28, 2023 7:39:16 GMT
I haven't even belittled him by pointing out that 'everyone' only has 3 syllables FFS lol He would still argue over that...There is nothing so desperate than a remnant. There is nothing so insulting as a Brexshitter. (fire with fire  ) |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 28, 2023 8:34:29 GMT
So Buccaneer you want to drag this on do you? FS asked me a question, I answered it and then he launched into abusive posting incl calling me the C word. His 'everyone does not think like me' doesn't actually address my original challenge to where he claimed that a demo outside a hotel refutes the point that the Daily Mail doesn't speak for everyone. A claim he still hasn't corrected. I walked away from the thread only to find that he and Jonksy had continued to throw insults against me so eventually I replied. I think we all should be grateful to Steve for telling us what we actually posted . |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 28, 2023 8:43:59 GMT
So Buccaneer you want to drag this on do you? FS asked me a question, I answered it and then he launched into abusive posting incl calling me the C word. His 'everyone does not think like me' doesn't actually address my original challenge to where he claimed that a demo outside a hotel refutes the point that the Daily Mail doesn't speak for everyone. A claim he still hasn't corrected. I walked away from the thread only to find that he and Jonksy had continued to throw insults against me so eventually I replied. You suggested to a poster to read the record. I did. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 28, 2023 11:18:04 GMT
You are obviously stinging from the failure of Brexit so far, including the OBR claim that UK productivity is down 4% thanks to Brexit. PS. If you need an urgent loan in order to visit Trump in prison Just ask, I'm sure there are some willing to help So far we are still out of the EU and with no medium term prospect of ever going back in. Brexit is a spectacular success in those terms . In very very basic terms, yes. But Brexit is about a lot more than than just leaving. |
|
)