|
Post by jonksy on Oct 21, 2022 19:54:55 GMT
LOL......I wonder if they have a bike shed at the HOC? ........She was the only one to leave school with more kids than qualifications.
You really do have a problem with working class women who have made something of themselves don't you. LOL There is a bloody good name for the likes of Rayner. The oly thing she has made for herself is a reputation....There is nothing wrong with peope who better themselves, but rayner is not one of them.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 21, 2022 19:56:57 GMT
LOL......I wonder if they have a bike shed at the HOC? ........She was the only one to leave school with more kids than qualifications.
The ginger growler spent that much time in the bikesheds she thought her teachers name was Raleigh Chopper. LOL
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 21, 2022 19:59:41 GMT
Would you prefer to see this pair at the helm? You'll never see Boris taking the knee would you. View Attachment Are you claiming that Boris is a racist? Are you claiming starmer is not?
|
|
|
Post by sword on Oct 21, 2022 21:40:16 GMT
You really do have a problem with working class women who have made something of themselves don't you. No we have a problem with 'working class women' who forget they were 'working class women'.
Made a name for themselves peddling their crusade, only to find that when they get the taste of 'money' and 'power' they end up no better than than those they are uprising against.
Meghan Markle the 'victim' she's a prime example of how women manipulate situations.
Who told you that bullshit?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2022 2:45:05 GMT
Sir keir made Borris look a clown a clown at prime minister question time . Labour have nothing to fear Apart from power. I'm looking forward to the new Labour utopia...
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 22, 2022 7:14:58 GMT
Are you claiming that Boris is a racist? Are you claiming starmer is not? Deviation in order to avoid my question. That is not debate.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 22, 2022 7:31:13 GMT
Are you claiming that taking the knee is racist? Yes, it plays into the separation of ethnic groups, it enhances the appeal of viewing black people as victims with no ability to change any given situation and views that as largely the fault of white people who are universally believed to be the oppressors of black people both intentionally and unintentionally. Taking the knee is a sign of acceptance of that outlook. In your opinion that is. In reality your opinion is a distortion of the facts leading to a post that appears to be in favour of racism against black people. Taking the knee is just supporting the fight against racism against black people that comes from the terraces, racism that is always ready to raise its ugly head given the opportunity. Despite the distortions in your post taking the knee is very clearly anti-racist.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Oct 22, 2022 7:39:29 GMT
Left-Wingers aren't the brightest stuck out there on the left wing, but then the same applies to Right-Wingers stuck out there on the right wing, which is why both can be considered extremists no matter where they get their information from. And those who try and makeout they are middle of the road are even worse..... And you matey are stuck right out there on the right wing. Will you actually ever get out of one line wonders congratulating yourself on how wonderful you are are being a right winger.. What is your problem with taking the knee which is a gesture of racism against black people. You clearly have a problem with them
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Oct 22, 2022 7:53:33 GMT
Are you claiming that Boris is a racist? Are you claiming starmer is not? The one line wonder in true form not answering a question. As he waffles around it. Starmer is not a racist. Boris is a lying racist clueless buffoon. Are you saying he is not. As you make clear you are against any one who is anti racist. That speaks volumes.. As it says on the tin this morning. No liar, crook, racist, should hold the office of PM once. Let alone twice. As the Fascist despots who call themselves a government of the people, in Westminster. Sink to a new depth of depravity. Even considering of electing a lying racist prat. Only interested in themselves. How many unelected Prime Minister do you need before the penny drops. Or if they put a rat in a blue coat. You would vote for it. So what is your problem with stopping racism. Do you hate Johnny Foreigner as well.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Oct 22, 2022 8:17:10 GMT
Yes, it plays into the separation of ethnic groups, it enhances the appeal of viewing black people as victims with no ability to change any given situation and views that as largely the fault of white people who are universally believed to be the oppressors of black people both intentionally and unintentionally. Taking the knee is a sign of acceptance of that outlook. In your opinion that is. In reality your opinion is a distortion of the facts leading to a post that appears to be in favour of racism against black people. Taking the knee is just supporting the fight against racism against black people that comes from the terraces, racism that is always ready to raise its ugly head given the opportunity. Despite the distortions in your post taking the knee is very clearly anti-racist. Well we are directly relating to the photo of Starmer and Rayner taking the knee in June 20 whereby they took the opportunity to show their direct support for the black lives matter movement and its wider context of demonstrations and actions. The problem is that the opposite of racism is non-racist. Anti-racism is a different entity altogether where those who are 'anti-racist' get to define who and what they are against and they are the ones who define what racism is. The badge of honour that must be worn is to show that one is 'anti-racist'. It is not enough to show non-racism one must display anti racist behaviour and Starmer and Rayner did exactly that as a matter of political expediency. Anti-racism goes hand in hand with critical race theory and similar teachings whereby individuals of a racial group are assigned an outlook, a privilege and a behaviour based only on the fact they belong to that racial group. This is clearly evidenced by the instructions given to white people who enter George Floyd Square where it is demanded of them they behave in a specific way. We have seldom seen this since the Jim Crow laws and apartheid SA where it was widely and roundly condemned. We have come far, I am saddened to say in entirely the wrong direction.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Oct 22, 2022 8:35:16 GMT
In your opinion that is. In reality your opinion is a distortion of the facts leading to a post that appears to be in favour of racism against black people. Taking the knee is just supporting the fight against racism against black people that comes from the terraces, racism that is always ready to raise its ugly head given the opportunity. Despite the distortions in your post taking the knee is very clearly anti-racist. Well we are directly relating to the photo of Starmer and Rayner taking the knee in June 20 whereby they took the opportunity to show their direct support for the black lives matter movement and its wider context of demonstrations and actions. The problem is that the opposite of racism is non-racist. Anti-racism is a different entity altogether where those who are 'anti-racist' get to define who and what they are against and they are the ones who define what racism is. The badge of honour that must be worn is to show that one is 'anti-racist'. It is not enough to show non-racism one must display anti racist behaviour and Starmer and Rayner did exactly that as a matter of political expediency. Anti-racism goes hand in hand with critical race theory and similar teachings whereby individuals of a racial group are assigned an outlook, a privilege and a behaviour based only on the fact they belong to that racial group. This is clearly evidenced by the instructions given to white people who enter George Floyd Square where it is demanded of them they behave in a specific way. We have seldom seen this since the Jim Crow laws and apartheid SA where it was widely and roundly condemned. We have come far, I am saddened to say in entirely the wrong direction. To cut a long story short. You are either a racist prat or you are not. And on here you do not need to be the brain of Britain to work out the meaning of the waffle to detract. It speaks volumes. Not only against blacks. But against any one who does not have a white supremacist sooper dooper English pedigree. Woof woof.. Hell even Harry has tainted the Royal Blood. FFS and they want those sicko's in Parliament. www.ktvu.com/news/markles-seed-will-taint-royal-family-lead-to-black-king-says-british-politicians-girlfriend
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 22, 2022 8:45:37 GMT
Imagine Boris and Nigel returning in the same week! We wouldn't need fireworks - the sound of exploding lefties would be everywhere!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 22, 2022 8:51:09 GMT
In your opinion that is. In reality your opinion is a distortion of the facts leading to a post that appears to be in favour of racism against black people. Taking the knee is just supporting the fight against racism against black people that comes from the terraces, racism that is always ready to raise its ugly head given the opportunity. Despite the distortions in your post taking the knee is very clearly anti-racist. Well we are directly relating to the photo of Starmer and Rayner taking the knee in June 20 whereby they took the opportunity to show their direct support for the black lives matter movement and its wider context of demonstrations and actions. The problem is that the opposite of racism is non-racist. Anti-racism is a different entity altogether where those who are 'anti-racist' get to define who and what they are against and they are the ones who define what racism is. The badge of honour that must be worn is to show that one is 'anti-racist'. It is not enough to show non-racism one must display anti racist behaviour and Starmer and Rayner did exactly that as a matter of political expediency. Anti-racism goes hand in hand with critical race theory and similar teachings whereby individuals of a racial group are assigned an outlook, a privilege and a behaviour based only on the fact they belong to that racial group. This is clearly evidenced by the instructions given to white people who enter George Floyd Square where it is demanded of them they behave in a specific way. We have seldom seen this since the Jim Crow laws and apartheid SA where it was widely and roundly condemned. We have come far, I am saddened to say in entirely the wrong direction. This sounds a lot like the racial characteristics argument brought up in old racialist theories. I'm inlined to agree with you on your non-racist vs anti-racist argument that precedes.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 22, 2022 9:02:14 GMT
In your opinion that is. In reality your opinion is a distortion of the facts leading to a post that appears to be in favour of racism against black people. Taking the knee is just supporting the fight against racism against black people that comes from the terraces, racism that is always ready to raise its ugly head given the opportunity. Despite the distortions in your post taking the knee is very clearly anti-racist. Well we are directly relating to the photo of Starmer and Rayner taking the knee in June 20 whereby they took the opportunity to show their direct support for the black lives matter movement and its wider context of demonstrations and actions. Complete nonsense ^^ exposing your lack of knowledge of why people in THIS country take the knee. I don't mind you using distortions, making false claims and insinuations as it just allows you to expose your position on racism without you posting what you really feel about the situation. But I suspect you fool no one.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 22, 2022 9:15:41 GMT
Imagine Boris and Nigel returning in the same week! We wouldn't need fireworks - the sound of exploding lefties would be everywhere! It would reverberate throughout the political system including with many Conservatives. If it happened, I suspect it would be the final nail in the Tory coffin, with the Right likely to be on the scrap heap for a couple of decades or more. It's just not enough the Righties cry My lust they cannot satisfy I'll try and try I just won't quit Till the whole damn country's in the shit.
|
|