Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:43:40 GMT
Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption. She has never claimed that she was raped . You are making shit up and insinuating racism. Do all lefties do that? She has never said she wasn't. Rape comes in many forms just ask Weinstein. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:44:40 GMT
Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption. I can see your failings you wear them like a badge. I'm afraid people who do not know the law should not be commenting on it. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:45:04 GMT
So you was making a non point then . Thanks for confirming it. But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. Of course she is fucking guilty.....Only a total prick would try and state otherwise.. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:47:52 GMT
You hit the nail on the head. There has been no trial. Are we, as a country, that scared and incompetent that we could not secure a girl until she is tried and if necessary sentenced. She was born in this country and groomed in this country, that's what we should be concentrating on. Pakistan have denied that she has dual nationality but even if she did are all people in this country subject to being stripped of their nationality if they commit a crime? Or is it just people of a Muslim background. Racism, you bet.
What, Sajid Javid is a racist? LOL! 
Or perhaps he could simply see that she would act as a high profile rallying point and icon for other wannabe jihadists.
Something which is totally obvious to anyone with even a single functioning brain cell. Of course, you know he isn't.🤣 Not very high profile, if found guilty and given a good sentence. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:51:11 GMT
She was under the age of 18, therefore a child by law. Classed as a Juvenile that is all the above the age of Criminal Responsibility which kicks in at the age of 10 years of age, or even younger as in the Bulger Child Murder case I am not saying she is innocent, that's my point, we do not know, she should be tried. Saying she represents a dander to our society, as the government have done, is rubbish. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:54:22 GMT
But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. Of course she is fucking guilty.....Only a total prick would try and state otherwise.. I haven't stated she is not guilty, I am sure she is and that she should be brought 'home' to get the facts. Even if it stops some other stupid person from ending up in the same situation. It's people like you that seem to believe that the law should apply unequally to certain sections of society that is the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:56:44 GMT
Of course she is fucking guilty.....Only a total prick would try and state otherwise.. , I am sure she is and that she should be brought 'home' to get the facts. Even if it stops some other stupid person from ending up in the same situation. It's people like you that seem to believe that the law should apply unequally to certain sections of society that is the problem. Your the one defending the slag....She serves as a good deterent to those who are mad enough to fall for the indoctrination and now know what the consequences are. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 24, 2023 11:58:18 GMT
So you was making a non point then . Thanks for confirming it. But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. You are either very naïve and not living in the real world, or the worst wind up merchant that has no idea how to debate in a mature manner, not that I really give a rat's arse about either way Forget the her appeals made to have her British Citizenship restored and was issued with a British Passport meaning she could travel back lawfully to the UK, what Offences do you think she could or should be charged with and put before a Criminal Court of Law ? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 11:59:17 GMT
So you was making a non point then . Thanks for confirming it. But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. And another one. Do all lefties post a stream of non points or just you ? You lied on another thread and now you post a stream of non points . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 24, 2023 11:59:21 GMT
Of course, you know he isn't.🤣 An Asian that hates Asians? Of course I don't know that he doesn't. But I'd say it's highly unlikely.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 12:00:20 GMT
She has never claimed that she was raped . You are making shit up and insinuating racism. Do all lefties do that? She has never said she wasn't. Rape comes in many forms just ask Weinstein. As far as I know Weinstein wasn’t there . Yet another non point . |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 12:01:38 GMT
But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. You are either very naïve and not living in the real world, or the worst wind up merchant that has no idea how to debate in a mature manner, not that I really give a rat's arse about either way Forget the her appeals made to have her British Citizenship restored and was issued with a British Passport meaning she could travel back lawfully to the UK, what Offences do you think she could or should be charged with and put before a Criminal Court of Law What a pity that the UK have stopped hanging traitors.....Yet again the karens got their way... |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 24, 2023 12:07:46 GMT
But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you. You are either very naïve and not living in the real world, or the worst wind up merchant that has no idea how to debate in a mature manner, not that I really give a rat's arse about either way Forget the her appeals made to have her British Citizenship restored and was issued with a British Passport meaning she could travel back lawfully to the UK, what Offences do you think she could or should be charged with and put before a Criminal Court of Law If the tabloid accounts (as believed by so many) are true then: Preparation of Terrorist Acts Collecting Information useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism Membership of a Proscribed Organisation Supporting a Proscribed Organisation Possession of an Article for Terrorist Purposes Encouragement of Terrorism Providing or Receiving Instruction or train for Terrorist purposes Attendance at a place for Terrorist Training and of course murder |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 24, 2023 12:38:43 GMT
I can see your failings you wear them like a badge. I'm afraid people who do not know the law should not be commenting on it. We know she was not Raped , because she was only 15 years of age when she arrived in Syria, within three week she married an ISIS Fighter and was made pregnant three times and produced three children all of which passed away, the Laws of consensual sex in Muslim Countries is often lower than here girls married off at a very early age often 10 or 12 years of age Here in England and Wales no child male or female under the age of 16 years can legally consent to sexual intercourse or any form of sexually activity with another even of their own age, suggest you should do as as you tell others and brush up on the Law |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Feb 24, 2023 12:43:35 GMT
Are you not just assuming the UK is guilty and must take responsibility? The question I am asking, which you keep dodging, is to what level does the Multicultural society have to take the blame? It is composed of individual communities and cultures and if one of those cultures produces problems for the other cultures, to a degree much greater than others, then should not that fact be recognised and addressed as a matter of urgency? I have not said the UK is guilty or assumed it and that is the point, no court of law has established the facts. The UK is guilty of stripping her of her right, as a British born person, of identity, and that is fact. Well what does taking responsibility mean other than being responsible. She had British Citizenship, she also had Bangladeshi citizenship should she seek to take it. Her British Citizenship was stripped not for what she did before she was an adult but for her actions after and the risk she poses to British Society. Her 'identity' in a multicultural society is very much open to question. Her identity as a British Citizen is very much at odds with what most British Citizens think it should be. Sometimes decisions made when youthful change your life and here we have such a decision. |
|
