Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:15:29 GMT
She was under the age of 18, therefore a child by law. Total BOLLOCKS yet again.. Do you disagree with our law, are you not British?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:16:13 GMT
She was under the age of 18, therefore a child by law. Not where she went to and she knew she was classified as a child, here, so why did she leave home? She was born in the UK and as such under our protection.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:17:26 GMT
Total BOLLOCKS yet again.. Do you disagree with our law, are you not British? What law? How many are prosecuted for getting knocked up well below the age of 16?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:18:21 GMT
I think that her parents do have a big responsibility for their daughter as any family does but it is well known that some parents are not the 'best' and she 'may' well have been influenced negatively by them. This happens throughout our country to people of all religions and persuasions. Are people who have been treated thus, now to be treated solely as criminals or, as our laws state, should extenuating circumstances be listened to. That would have to be decided by a court of law after the evidence has been presented. Assuming guilt is what Russia and China do, are we that bad. Are you not just assuming the UK is guilty and must take responsibility? The question I am asking, which you keep dodging, is to what level does the Multicultural society have to take the blame? It is composed of individual communities and cultures and if one of those cultures produces problems for the other cultures, to a degree much greater than others, then should not that fact be recognised and addressed as a matter of urgency? I have not said the UK is guilty or assumed it and that is the point, no court of law has established the facts. The UK is guilty of stripping her of her right, as a British born person, of identity, and that is fact.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:19:24 GMT
Are you so clever that you know what external influences were at work without any sort of evidence to produce? She 'may' have decided to leave of her own free will and also decided that she would chop peoples head off but without evidence they are just deluded claims of racists. Influenced? Everyone is influenced. I thought you meant she might have been kidnapped. It is pretty evident she wasn't - ie she made the decision to go Grooming does not exist in your world then, people should be able to resist it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:20:23 GMT
A Canadian special forces operative got her there. Are you saying that the Canadian special forces operative kidnapped her? Because if you are not then you are posting a non point . That's the point we do not know because we will not allow her to be tried and get to the truth.π
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:22:44 GMT
Do you disagree with our law, are you not British? What law? How many are prosecuted for getting knocked up well below the age of 16? Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 11:22:58 GMT
Are you saying that the Canadian special forces operative kidnapped her? Because if you are not then you are posting a non point . That's the point we do not know because we will not allow her to be tried and get to the truth.π So you was making a non point then . Thanks for confirming it.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 11:24:50 GMT
What law? How many are prosecuted for getting knocked up well below the age of 16? Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption. She has never claimed that she was raped . You are making shit up and insinuating racism. Do all lefties do that?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 24, 2023 11:25:49 GMT
What law? How many are prosecuted for getting knocked up well below the age of 16? Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption. I can see your failings you wear them like a badge.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 24, 2023 11:26:13 GMT
Well done, now you can see the failings. How do know she willingly had sex? You don't but because she is of a different background you seem to be making that assumption. She has never claimed that she was raped . You are making shit up and insinuating racism. Do all lefties do that? Yes. It's what they do in lieu of genuine argument.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 24, 2023 11:28:11 GMT
She has never claimed that she was raped . You are making shit up and insinuating racism. Do all lefties do that? Yes. It's what they do in lieu of genuine argument. He does seem to do this .
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 24, 2023 11:29:34 GMT
If you considered your ridiculous statement for one moment, you would realise that MI5 have stated that they have hard evidence that this person would be a threat to the security of the UK, therefore any trial would result in a substantial custodial sentence, paid for by my income tax. I am quite happy that she is left in a ramshackle and inhospitable tented camp, that was her choice and we should respect that. You hit the nail on the head. There has been no trial. Are we, as a country, that scared and incompetent that we could not secure a girl until she is tried and if necessary sentenced. She was born in this country and groomed in this country, that's what we should be concentrating on. Pakistan have denied that she has dual nationality but even if she did are all people in this country subject to being stripped of their nationality if they commit a crime? Or is it just people of a Muslim background. Racism, you bet.
What, Sajid Javid is a racist? LOL!
Or perhaps he could simply see that she would act as a high profile rallying point and icon for other wannabe jihadists.
Something which is totally obvious to anyone with even a single functioning brain cell.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 24, 2023 11:33:28 GMT
You would not know the truth if you fell arse over tit on it... She was under the age of 18, therefore a child by law. Classed as a Juvenile that is all, above the age of Criminal Responsibility which kicks in at the age of 10 years of age, or even younger as in the Bulger Child Murder case
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2023 11:42:06 GMT
That's the point we do not know because we will not allow her to be tried and get to the truth.π So you was making a non point then . Thanks for confirming it. But, of course, you know she is guilty. I wonder why we even need courts if we have people like you.
|
|