|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 25, 2022 22:29:06 GMT
In that case, he is a card-carrying cunt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 0:32:57 GMT
In that case, he is a card-carrying cunt. IF what Pacifico is saying is true |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 0:38:24 GMT
If people don't know by now the DM is full of shit then I guess they never will. The DM simply lifted the story from the Telegraph who lifted the story from Pink News who interviewed Starmer - it's Starmers own pledge they are repeating. Well if that was the case you'd be able to easily post a link to such in Pink News, please do And no your June 2021 tweet by Pink News does not count, way too long ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 26, 2022 0:50:45 GMT
In that case, he is a card-carrying cunt. IF what Pacifico is saying is true We have serious problems threatening our country, so if Starmer is more interested in appeasing minority groups, he is really unfit to govern. I see it as somewhat dishonest, in fact. We need less social legislation, not more of it. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 26, 2022 0:53:08 GMT
IF what Pacifico is saying is true We have serious problems threatening our country, so if Starmer is more interested in appeasing minority groups, he is really unfit to govern. I see it as somewhat dishonest, in fact. We need less social legislation, not more of it. So you'd start with demonising the transexuals, where would you finish in this removal of social legislation and how many people's lives would you ruin? |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 26, 2022 1:26:27 GMT
We have serious problems threatening our country, so if Starmer is more interested in appeasing minority groups, he is really unfit to govern. I see it as somewhat dishonest, in fact. We need less social legislation, not more of it. So you'd start with demonising the transexuals, where would you finish in this removal of social legislation and how many people's lives would you ruin? I support social responsibility. The government should not take over the role of parents. We can not afford it for one thing. Also, your question is a leading one. My intention was not to destroy lives but to rebuild the country. Starmer looks like a liar, because if you are going to pack the agenda of government with social regs then nothing will be done to fix the real problems, which I believe will destroy us all.
It just goes to show in his interview to Gay News that he is at their beck and call at a drop of the hat. We are about the worst performing economy of all major industrial economies except Russia. If the government are going to say in response, let them have trans regs, when they ask for bread, well you know it does not go down well. This is the power of social pressure group lobbying. I want a leader who will not listen to their bullshit. If you want to know the real issues as a PM you need to sample randomly, don't get your news second, third or forth hand. |
|
