|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 24, 2022 23:00:08 GMT
See Equivocal's post ^  Is that a get out or what, lol. It's just I wouldn't like to think you were using a cause you didn't support back in the day as a club to beat a different cause you don't support today. What! Einy, rest assured I have never supported thin skinned left wing woke warriors who think they're on a mission from god. And never will. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 24, 2022 23:03:06 GMT
It's just I wouldn't like to think you were using a cause you didn't support back in the day as a club to beat a different cause you don't support today. What! Einy, rest assured I have never supported thin skinned left wing woke warriors who think they're on a mission from god. And never will. Okay. If you didn't support the feminists in their struggle for their rights, don't use the argument that transgender people are undermining those rights. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 24, 2022 23:17:28 GMT
What! Einy, rest assured I have never supported thin skinned left wing woke warriors who think they're on a mission from god. And never will. Okay. If you didn't support the feminists in their struggle for their rights, don't use the argument that transgender people are undermining those rights. Good point mate. It's a big no no, and just another hole the unwary can fall down, like tripping over a paving stone and falling down a open manhole.
You need a unified philosophy and you need to do your research on the origin of these moments. Chances are all roads will lead to one source. It's that Hegelian trick being played.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 24, 2022 23:27:15 GMT
What! Einy, rest assured I have never supported thin skinned left wing woke warriors who think they're on a mission from god. And never will. Okay. If you didn't support the feminists in their struggle for their rights, don't use the argument that transgender people are undermining those rights. LOL, Einy trust me, you would wee your panties if as a kid you were faced with the possibility of walking in my boots, and it must be said, with good reason. Don't talk to me about bullshit like feminists struggling for their rights. In this argument we are not in the same room, we are not on the same planet in fact, we are not in the same universe. You have no idea, like most righteous pampered millennials you wouldn't know a hard time if you tripped over it. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 25, 2022 0:41:50 GMT
Starmer 'WILL change law to allow trans people to self declare their gender in line with Scotland.Sir Keir Starmer would change the law to allow transgender people to self-identify their gender if Labour is elected, it has been revealed. The Labour Party's divisions over Scotland's controversial new gender law were laid bare yesterday, as MPs were said to be split over whether the party should back First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's new rules, supported by Scottish Labour, on transgender recognition. Mr Starmer has now said he would 'update' the gender recognition act, despite concerns the move could affect women's rights, The Telegraph reported. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11570689/Labour-war-Scotlands-new-law-changing-gender.htmlIs this how Starmer thinks he's going to win back the red wall? I suggest you actually read the article. You've fallen (again) for classic DM click bait false story headlining which the actual article refutes (which is how the ever dishonest DM escapes legal action knowing full well the damage is done because drones will propagate the headline, not the truth). From the article: 'UK Labour has said it wants to give trans people greater protections, but Sir Keir Starmer last night refused to say how far he would go'IE the headline you've propagated is a big fat lie. So owned. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 25, 2022 0:45:30 GMT
Okay. If you didn't support the feminists in their struggle for their rights, don't use the argument that transgender people are undermining those rights. LOL, Einy trust me, you would wee your panties if as a kid you were faced with the possibility of walking in my boots, and it must be said, with good reason. Don't talk to me about bullshit like feminists struggling for their rights. In this argument we are not in the same room, we are not on the same planet in fact, we are not in the same universe. You have no idea, like most righteous pampered millennials you wouldn't know a hard time if you tripped over it. You're beautiful when you're angry, Red. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 25, 2022 0:56:13 GMT
LOL, Einy trust me, you would wee your panties if as a kid you were faced with the possibility of walking in my boots, and it must be said, with good reason. Don't talk to me about bullshit like feminists struggling for their rights. In this argument we are not in the same room, we are not on the same planet in fact, we are not in the same universe. You have no idea, like most righteous pampered millennials you wouldn't know a hard time if you tripped over it. You're beautiful when you're angry, Red. I'm beautiful all the time. But the fact that you think I'm angry is, pretty special tbh. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 25, 2022 1:00:29 GMT
You're beautiful when you're angry, Red. I'm beautiful all the time. But the fact that you think I'm angry is, pretty special tbh. You're always angry, Red. It's what you do. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 25, 2022 1:07:20 GMT
I'm beautiful all the time. But the fact that you think I'm angry is, pretty special tbh. You're always angry, Red. It's what you do. I'm not always angry, in fact I'm rarely angry these days. Perhaps our perception of anger is different. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Dec 25, 2022 1:10:09 GMT
You're always angry, Red. It's what you do. I'm not always angry, in fact I'm rarely angry these days. Perhaps our perception of anger is different. Tell me again how you threw yourself on a live grenade to protect me back in the 70s. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 25, 2022 11:28:57 GMT
Starmer 'WILL change law to allow trans people to self declare their gender in line with Scotland.Sir Keir Starmer would change the law to allow transgender people to self-identify their gender if Labour is elected, it has been revealed. The Labour Party's divisions over Scotland's controversial new gender law were laid bare yesterday, as MPs were said to be split over whether the party should back First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's new rules, supported by Scottish Labour, on transgender recognition. Mr Starmer has now said he would 'update' the gender recognition act, despite concerns the move could affect women's rights, The Telegraph reported. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11570689/Labour-war-Scotlands-new-law-changing-gender.htmlIs this how Starmer thinks he's going to win back the red wall? I suggest you actually read the article. You've fallen (again) for classic DM click bait false story headlining which the actual article refutes (which is how the ever dishonest DM escapes legal action knowing full well the damage is done because drones will propagate the headline, not the truth). From the article: 'UK Labour has said it wants to give trans people greater protections, but Sir Keir Starmer last night refused to say how far he would go'IE the headline you've propagated is a big fat lie. So owned. If people don't know by now the DM is full of shit then I guess they never will. There are real and proper academics who have valid arguments about this woke. The DM is actually woke on many issues anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Dec 25, 2022 11:38:53 GMT
The DM has never apologised for that Zinoviev letter, its DNA remains the same: a lie gets readers, the truth doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 25, 2022 12:14:30 GMT
If people don't know by now the DM is full of shit then I guess they never will. The DM simply lifted the story from the Telegraph who lifted the story from Pink News who interviewed Starmer - it's Starmers own pledge they are repeating. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Dec 25, 2022 14:28:31 GMT
If people don't know by now the DM is full of shit then I guess they never will. The DM simply lifted the story from the Telegraph who lifted the story from Pink News who interviewed Starmer - it's Starmers own pledge they are repeating. Well in that case we have Chinese whispers. Each embellishes with their own spin. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 25, 2022 17:43:41 GMT
No Chinese whispers at all - just his own words.. see 2:22 minutes in.
"and we’re committed to updating the GRA to introduce self-declaration for trans people"
|
|
