|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Nov 17, 2024 11:17:48 GMT
It's amazing the fuckwits didn't notice for 11 years! The fact that Reeves is supposedly in charge of the economy is proof of the collective fuckwittery going on. Those who still support the pathological liar are beyond help, but those currently crying, because they were dumb enough to vote for evil, I say only this: The succubus has no remorse.
People seem to have lost their minds in the UK. I'm not crying though. I think living here, you just have to get on with it. I'm going got get a new business together myself. I just have to run it in such a way as to bear the least exposure to fuckwittery. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 18, 2024 19:50:12 GMT
Pressure grows on Rachel from accounts... Guido’s scoop on Rachel Reeves changing her LinkedIn from posing as an “economist” at the Bank of Scotland to merely working in “retail banking” at Halifax continues to make grim reading for the the Chancellor. Reeves is now facing mounting questions after being economical with the truth about her career credentials. So much her lofty promises of “integrity” and “transparency”… The mainstream media, including The Telegraph, The Sun, The Mail, The Express, andGB News, have all followed the story. The Times headlined with “Pressure grows on Rachel Reeves to explain ‘fake claims’ on CV“, as Tory voices accuse her of “brazen lies.” Meanwhile, Reeves also fudged the numbers on her Bank of England tenure in an interview with Stylist, boasting of working there for a “decade,” despite working there for just six years. Pressure on the first female Chancellor to be forced to change her story on her “economic expertise” doesn’t look set to go away any time soon order-order.com/2024/11/18/media-pressure-grows-on-reeves-after-cv-fake-claims-revealed/Guido says pressure grows on Reeves, which is correct, but the pressure is growing on Starmer too. He cant afford to lose his chancellor so soon after winning the election, he has little choice but to stand by her. And as the accusations grow so will the pressure on both of them, I'm pleased to say. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 18, 2024 22:38:37 GMT
Currently listening to Jacob Rees Mogg discussing Rachel from accounts on GB News. He says she is a liar because she said she was an economist for ten years, when in reality she was in fact a complaints handler for six years. Rees Mogg says this is a clear breach of the ministerial code, and in the past Starmer has pointed out many times that a breach of the ministerial code is very serious indeed. However, I suspect on this occasion he will insist... move along folks, nothing to see here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 18, 2024 22:55:53 GMT
Currently listening to Jacob Rees Mogg discussing Rachel from accounts on GB News. He says she is a liar because she said she was an economist for ten years, when in reality she was in fact a complaints handler for six years. Rees Mogg says this is a clear breach of the ministerial code, and in the past Starmer has pointed out many times that a breach of the ministerial code is very serious indeed. However, I suspect on this occasion he will insist... move along folks, nothing to see here. This is a about the 4th or 5th different job Reeves surposed to have why wasnt this jumped on pre election |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 18, 2024 23:02:19 GMT
This is a about the 4th or 5th different job Reeves surposed to have why wasnt this jumped on pre election Fair question, I suppose it's because a chancellor attracts more scrutiny than a shadow chancellor. And when journalists and the media discover the chancellor has been economical with the truth they tend to dig deeper. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 18, 2024 23:05:08 GMT
This is a about the 4th or 5th different job Reeves surposed to have why wasnt this jumped on pre election Fair question, I suppose it's because a chancellor attracts more scrutiny than a shadow chancellor. And when journalists and the media discover the chancellor has been economical with the truth they tend to dig deeper. Ok but like i said think its the 4th or 5th different job assigned to her surry there no truth to it all |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 18, 2024 23:18:09 GMT
Ok but like i said think its the 4th or 5th different job assigned to her surry there no truth to it all TTL, Rachel from accounts customer complaints, most definately lied on her CV, there is absolutely no doubt about it, and the more people dig into her CV and background, the more 'anomalies' they find. Some clued up commentators say she will balls it out for a while but if this continues her demise is inevitable, and if she goes, it will damage Starmer, a lot.  |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 18, 2024 23:26:57 GMT
Ok but like i said think its the 4th or 5th different job assigned to her surry there no truth to it all TTL, Rachel from accounts customer complaints, most definately lied on her CV, there is absolutely no doubt about it, and the more people dig into her CV and background, the more 'anomalies' they find. Some clued up commentators say she will balls it out for a while but if this continues her demise is inevitable, and if she goes, it will damage Starmer, a lot. I dont think she lied she always claim to be a bank of England economist. Lets see what happens it all reminds me of the Attack Angie rayner got what was nothing but right wing nut jobs lies |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 18, 2024 23:32:29 GMT
I dont think she lied she always claim to be a bank of England economist. Lets see what happens it all reminds me of the Attack Angie rayner got what was nothing but right wing nut jobs lies She lied. See OP, and several subsequent posts... |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 18, 2024 23:35:21 GMT
I dont think she lied she always claim to be a bank of England economist. Lets see what happens it all reminds me of the Attack Angie rayner got what was nothing but right wing nut jobs lies She lied. See OP, and several subsequent posts... They said Angina rayner lied i think its just all mud throwing whats not good for our economy |
|
|
|
Post by honestjohn on Nov 19, 2024 9:47:33 GMT
She lied. See OP, and several subsequent posts... They said Angina rayner lied i think its just all mud throwing whats not good for our economy I didn't know she had angina, we don't want to know about her heart problems. We want to know not whether, but why Rachel Reeves changed her history on the linkein website as documented for all to see. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 19, 2024 10:00:09 GMT
She lied. See OP, and several subsequent posts... They said Angina rayner lied i think its just all mud throwing whats not good for our economy I think we all agree that Labour aren't good for our economy.  |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 19, 2024 10:06:47 GMT
They said Angina rayner lied i think its just all mud throwing whats not good for our economy I think we all agree that Labour aren't good for our economy. Well i posted a thread disputed that claim |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 19, 2024 10:11:17 GMT
This is a about the 4th or 5th different job Reeves surposed to have why wasnt this jumped on pre election Fair question, I suppose it's because a chancellor attracts more scrutiny than a shadow chancellor. And when journalists and the media discover the chancellor has been economical with the truth they tend to dig deeper. Indeed. A shadow chancellor has very little power whereas a chancellor has a huge amount. it makes sense ( for her enemies)to sit on anything that would harm her reputation until it does the maximum damage . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 19, 2024 10:13:51 GMT
She lied. See OP, and several subsequent posts... They said Angina rayner lied i think its just all mud throwing whats not good for our economy Strange that. Labour and its supporters threw plenty of mud at the Tories when they were in office. Never noticed your posts telling them that it was not good for the economy. |
|
