|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 29, 2024 2:10:28 GMT
So because it is a discussion forum that law can just be ignored? What kind of illegal activities are being facilitated here? All The Best The law! Illegal activities! What the hell are you talking about. Listen bucko, I've never ignored anyone but you're a pain in the arse, raise your game or ship out. Bollocks. You don't get to decide if I leave or not. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 29, 2024 2:27:17 GMT
The law! Illegal activities! What the hell are you talking about. Listen bucko, I've never ignored anyone but you're a pain in the arse, raise your game or ship out. Bollocks. You don't get to decide if I leave or not. All The Best Of course not, I would rather you didn't leave. I would however like you to, raise your game.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Sept 29, 2024 3:10:37 GMT
As I may have said before these militant muslims likw Warsi are actually the New Nazis. They're fiercely anti-Semitic and in favour of wiping the Jews off the face of the Earth - and they regard muslims as the superior race. I'm not sure that the parallels with the Nazis can can get any closer. It's just surprising that so dew people have spotted it. Do you have definitive proof that Warsi has made any statement in favour of "wiping Jews off the face of the Earth". You need to hope you do, otherwise you've potentially just opened up the Forum Owner and Forum Host to charges of Libel. All The Best Oh ffs. You've been around SteveK too long. You need to get a life.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Sept 29, 2024 3:44:00 GMT
I'm not sticking up for baroness Sayeeda Hussain Warsi, the only reason she's a baroness is because she is from Pakistani Muslim stock. However...
When in opposition Labour demanded a full police investigation into her expenses after it was alleged that she claimed up to £2,000 in rent despite staying rent-free in the London home of a wealthy party donor.
Moving on a couple of years...
Starmer accepted a £20,000 donation from Lord Waheed Alli, which was initially recorded as 'office expenses'. It has now been revealed it was in fact for an extended stay at Lord Ali's £18 million central London penthouse apartment. When found out Starmer said, and this is incredible, he said he needed to stay at Lord Ali's multi million pound apartment because his son needed to study for his GCSE's.
Starmer should not resign, he should not be allowed to resign. He should be sacked. The man is an embarrassment not only to the Labour party but to this country.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 29, 2024 3:54:03 GMT
I'm not sticking up for baroness Sayeeda Hussain Warsi, the only reason she's a baroness is because she is from Pakistani Muslim stock. However... When in opposition Labour demanded a full police investigation into her expenses after it was alleged that she claimed up to £2,000 in rent despite staying rent-free in the London home of a wealthy party donor. Moving on a couple of years... Starmer accepted a £20,000 donation from Lord Waheed Alli, which was initially recorded as 'office expenses'. It has now been revealed it was in fact for an extended stay at Lord Ali's £18 million central London penthouse apartment. When found out Starmer said, and this is incredible, he said he needed to stay at Lord Ali's multi million pound apartment because his son needed to study for his GCSE's. Starmer should not resign, he should not be allowed to resign. He should be sacked. The man is an embarrassment not only to the Labour party but to this country. 2TK stayed at alli's house during the pandemic it has been found out recently they even changed the room that he done his tv interviews in to look like it was 2TK's abode...
Keir Starmer sparks fresh fury after using Labour donor’s penthouse during Covid-19 pandemic: 'Staggering!'
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 29, 2024 6:10:22 GMT
Do you have definitive proof that Warsi has made any statement in favour of "wiping Jews off the face of the Earth". You need to hope you do, otherwise you've potentially just opened up the Forum Owner and Forum Host to charges of Libel.
All The Best No - read the T&C's He screams the same thing on multiple threads to try and shut down discussion. It highlights the fact that he isn't mature enough to be on this forum. Keep in mind that Islamists have mass-murdered innocent people over cartoonist drawings in the past.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 6:49:29 GMT
Whose? The Forums? The Hosting Companies? Both of which are trumped by The Law. All The Best The T&C's you agreed to when you signed up here. 17. YOUR RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEFAMATORY COMMENTS
You agree and understand that you may be held legally responsible for damages suffered by other Website members or third-parties as the result of Your remarks, information, feedback or other content posted or made available on the Website that is deemed defamatory or otherwise legally actionable. Under the Federal Communications Decency Act of 1996, ProBoards is not legally responsible, nor can it be held liable for damages of any kind, arising out of or in connection to any defamatory or otherwise legally actionable remarks, information, feedback or other content posted or made available on the Website.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2024 7:13:57 GMT
She is actually one of the few Tories I actually respect. Probably because she's not far right. She does seem to have been fighting quite a battle in the last few years. Yes, the Tories are riven with Islamophobia as are many of their supporters - as this thread clearly indicates.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 7:21:32 GMT
She is actually one of the few Tories I actually respect. Probably because she's not far right. She does seem to have been fighting quite a battle in the last few years. Yes, the Tories are riven with Islamophobia as are many of their supporters - as this thread clearly indicates. define Islamophobia
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2024 7:25:46 GMT
Yes, the Tories are riven with Islamophobia as are many of their supporters - as this thread clearly indicates. define Islamophobia The Oxford English dictionary puts it thus.... dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force: This thread is riven with right wingers imbued with it.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Sept 29, 2024 7:38:47 GMT
The Oxford English dictionary puts it thus.... dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force: This thread is riven with right wingers imbued with it. If you point out that Muslims are proportionally more likely to be perpetrators of a sex crime than other sections of the community is that prejudice? If you point out that Muslims are proportionally more likely to be unemployed and on welfare than other sections of the community is that prejudice? This islamophobia thingy is all a bit vague..
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 29, 2024 8:01:41 GMT
The Oxford English dictionary puts it thus.... dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force: This thread is riven with right wingers imbued with it. If you point out that Muslims are proportionally more likely to be perpetrators of a sex crime than other sections of the community is that prejudice? If you point out that Muslims are proportionally more likely to be unemployed and on welfare than other sections of the community is that prejudice? This islamophobia thingy is all a bit vague.. Its prejudice if you claim it when its not true or relevant. The main perpetrators of sex crime are middle aged men, but to make such a claim implies its significant among us, when it isn't. So the answer to your question is context.
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 29, 2024 8:34:48 GMT
The Oxford English dictionary puts it thus.... dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force: This thread is riven with right wingers imbued with it. This is what the Labour party stand for today? To not only make it illegal not to like Islam, but also associate not liking Islam with a mental disorder? Blimey, I know the old Communist regimes were mental, but damn, I can't see many people insisting that this should become law.
Still, at least there's one less Islamist in the Tory party.
As for not liking Wahhabism, ISIS, al-Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood, which are all political forces (Islamism) then I guess most of the country will be going to prison.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Sept 29, 2024 8:41:05 GMT
The Oxford English dictionary puts it thus.... dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force: This thread is riven with right wingers imbued with it. This is what the Labour party stand for today? To not only make it illegal not to like Islam, but also associate not liking Islam with a mental disorder? Blimey, I know the old Communist regimes were mental, but damn, I can't see many people insisting that this should become law.
Still, at least there's one less Islamist in the Tory party.
As for not liking Wahhabism, ISIS, al-Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood, which are all political forces (Islamism) then I guess most of the country will be going to prison.
You should let them know, I don't think the Labour know this themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 29, 2024 8:47:30 GMT
This is what the Labour party stand for today? To not only make it illegal not to like Islam, but also associate not liking Islam with a mental disorder? Blimey, I know the old Communist regimes were mental, but damn, I can't see many people insisting that this should become law.
Still, at least there's one less Islamist in the Tory party.
As for not liking Wahhabism, ISIS, al-Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood, which are all political forces (Islamism) then I guess most of the country will be going to prison.
You should let them know, I don't think the Labour know this themselves. Funny, they only literally did a u-turn on this:
However, the fact that they have been the prime contender to push this insane law (the fact that they were going to try and implement it), which undermines EVERYTHING that my civilisation stands for, I would advise extreme vigilance.
Thankfully, unless Starmer takes in Warsi her time trying to subjegate the country has come to an end. She can't quit twice, but I'm sure there are more Islamists still working to turn us into slaves.
Do you support them?
|
|