|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 28, 2024 15:30:10 GMT
If you did work for The Express then that might explain your enthusiasm for misrepresenting what people have said to cast them in an unfair and unfavourable light - so what is your excuse for doing this? The Express is misreporting here (in much the same way that I describe how you misrepresented the events and the dialogue above, although, in its defence it does not do so to the same degree or scale as you have done). What I describe above is a what happened on the show. Instead of lapping up the skewed reporting of the notoriously biased Express, why don’t you just view the relevant section of iplayer and review the truth of the matter directly for yourself? So now posters on here who are saying Bruce is a bias lefty who got caught out for her bias, so 1.3 million viewers didn't notice her bias ...... LOL
The Express like many posters on here were well on to her bias lefty nasty attitude to the Reform 'guest', I suppose the only credit I can give you is you didn't turn to personal nasty abuse like andrea because you have been proven WRONG.
If that’s what posters on here are saying then that is opinion and they are entitled to it no matter how biased or bigoted those opinions might be. That is very different to wilfully and repeatedly misrepresenting and creating falsehood about events and dialogue which deserves to be called out for what it is, particularly as it can all so easily be disproved by simply watching a recording of the relevant section of the show on iplayer. However, facing the evidence and truth seems to be a step too far for you for some reason. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 28, 2024 15:30:33 GMT
Is Fiona Bruce the problem, or is Question Time? No one knows if BBC bias, sexism or soundbite politics is to blame. Every Thursday evening, furious viewers mass on Twitter to denounce BBC One’s Question Time. Fiona Bruce, the host, is deemed “irritating” and “rude” and seemingly winds up just about everyone, while viewers across the spectrum cry “bias!” without anyone being able to agree on which side her supposed bias lies. Described simultaneously as anti-Brexit, pro-Tory and a “left-wing mouthpiece”, Bruce has inadvertently made herself the figurehead for the culture war in broadcasting, where the right accuse the BBC of wokeism, and the left accuse the BBC of pandering to the establishment. On 23 June, Bruce asked the RMT union boss Mick Lynch whether driving up public sector wages would increase inflation, seemingly in the place of the treasury minister Rachel Maclean, who was on the panel. It is possible that the BBC is nervous of the supposed left-wing bias that has been used as a justification for slashing the licence fee, and it may be that Bruce bears this in mind while presenting. However, audiences should know that impartiality in broadcasting doesn’t require all sides to be given equal weight. BBC editorial guidelines note that due impartiality does not require “absolute neutrality on every issue”, but that presenters must be inclusive and ensure that the “existence of a range of views is appropriately reflected”. Frustratingly, but perhaps reasonably, this means that not all parts of the spectrum will get their fair share of the allotted time. It is also worth remembering that the Question Time audience is deliberately selected to reflect the political demographics of the country. So, although Bruce is accused of selecting the “Tory plant’s questions”, she is simply statistically more likely to select someone who voted Conservative than Labour. www.newstatesman.com/thestaggers/2022/09/bbc-question-time-fiona-bruce-problem |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 15:32:30 GMT
So now posters on here who are saying Bruce is a bias lefty who got caught out for her bias, so 1.3 million viewers didn't notice her bias ...... LOL
The Express like many posters on here were well on to her bias lefty nasty attitude to the Reform 'guest', I suppose the only credit I can give you is you didn't turn to personal nasty abuse like andrea because you have been proven WRONG.
If that’s what posters on here are saying then that is opinion and they are entitled to it no matter how biased or bigoted those opinions might be. That is very different to wilfully and repeatedly misrepresenting and creating falsehood about events and dialogue which deserves to be called out for what it is, particularly as it can all so easily be disproved by simply watching a recording of the relevant section of the show on iplayer. However, facing the evidence and truth seems to be a step to far for you for some reason. I asked you about the personal abuse?
Are you going to be a typical lefty and avoid the question.
Do you agree with andrewbrown calling me a retard and liar?
A simple YES or NO will surfice?
Please don't evade the question
Yes or NO?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 15:34:03 GMT
pipe down andrea, there were three show of hands confirming they were either Reform voters or supporters, it doesn't matter how many time you do a see2 and call people righies lies it wont wash like it doesn't with him, THREE SHOW OF REFORM HANDS, that's all we need to know, we can only assume you are lying or you can't count. It fucking matters what the question is you retard. I gave you the chance. Now I know you're just a liar. Absolutely disgusting ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 28, 2024 15:35:11 GMT
What course of action do you think he should have taken when faced with someone who continues to ignore the truth despite it being pointed out to him or her and despite a recording of the incident being readily available for review? The lefties wouldn't know the truth if they fell arse over tit on it... The truth is that he was faced with someone who continued to ignore the truth despite it being pointed out to him or her and despite a recording of the incident being readily available for review. So, rather than just dish out hollow insults, why don’t you tell us what course of action, in your view, he should have taken rather than the one that he opted for? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 28, 2024 15:37:12 GMT
The lefties wouldn't know the truth if they fell arse over tit on it... The truth isthmi he was faced with someone who continued to ignore the truth despite it being pointed out to him or her and despite a recording of the incident being readily available for review? so, rather than just critics and dish out hollow insults, why don’t you tell us what course of action, in your view, he should have taken rather than te one that he opted for?There is an ignore button or didn't you know? |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Sept 28, 2024 15:40:38 GMT
So are you saying that backing down from someone who denies the truth and avoids looking at the evidence for fear that it will prove him or her to be wrong is the course of action that he should have followed ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 15:46:45 GMT
It fucking matters what the question is you retard. I gave you the chance. Now I know you're just a liar. Absolutely disgusting ^^^ Right I'll show you how it works
andrewbrown started the personal abuse on me, and I'll finish it off, as Tin has pointed out he will not take action when he can see tit-for-tat
Well andrea is the tit, and now I'm going to be the tat, and he can't report me
adrewbrown is a sniveling groveling lefty double standard hypocrite, a opportunist who will report any right wing post he can, he hounded jonksy in to the ground, demanding he was banned, and here he is calling me a 'retard' and 'liar' after all the whinging whining playing the victim to tin ... here he is abusing other posters, he's a coward who can't hack the truth, and for that reason he turns nasty vile and abusive towards other posters.
Report this andrewbrown, if you can't take it, well don't dish it out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 15:56:17 GMT
So now posters on here who are saying Bruce is a bias lefty who got caught out for her bias, so 1.3 million viewers didn't notice her bias ...... LOL
The Express like many posters on here were well on to her bias lefty nasty attitude to the Reform 'guest', I suppose the only credit I can give you is you didn't turn to personal nasty abuse like andrea because you have been proven WRONG.
If that’s what posters on here are saying then that is opinion and they are entitled to it no matter how biased or bigoted those opinions might be. That is very different to wilfully and repeatedly misrepresenting and creating falsehood about events and dialogue which deserves to be called out for what it is, particularly as it can all so easily be disproved by simply watching a recording of the relevant section of the show on iplayer. However, facing the evidence and truth seems to be a step to far for you for some reason. If that’s what posters on here are saying then that is opinion and they are entitled to it no matter how biased or bigoted those opinions might be. That is very different to wilfully and repeatedly misrepresenting and creating falsehood about events and dialogue which deserves to be called out for what it is, particularly as it can all so easily be disproved by simply watching a recording of the relevant section of the show on iplayer. However, facing the evidence and truth seems to be a step to far for you for some reason. I asked you about the personal abuse?
Are you going to be a typical lefty and avoid the question.
Do you agree with andrewbrown calling me a retard and liar?
A simple YES or NO will surfice?
Please don't evade the question
Yes or NO?
Still waiting?? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Sept 28, 2024 15:57:04 GMT
It fucking matters what the question is you retard. I gave you the chance. Now I know you're just a liar. Grow up andrea, the fact you are swearing at me and being abusive which we know YOU would report other posters for especially jonksy, it is now in the 'national press' Bruce is a bias lefty, who tried to belittle and discredit a Reform panelist and came embarrassingly UNSTUCK.
Now stop with the personal abuse even though I'm not a cry baby like you running to the mods, someone else might report your abuse.
You are embarrassing yourself.
No. You are just wrong. I corrected you the first time, now you've repeated it twice since. You can't say you didn't understand. Therefore you're a liar. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 16:02:31 GMT
Grow up andrea, the fact you are swearing at me and being abusive which we know YOU would report other posters for especially jonksy, it is now in the 'national press' Bruce is a bias lefty, who tried to belittle and discredit a Reform panelist and came embarrassingly UNSTUCK.
Now stop with the personal abuse even though I'm not a cry baby like you running to the mods, someone else might report your abuse.
You are embarrassing yourself.
No. You are just wrong. I corrected you the first time, now you've repeated it twice since. You can't say you didn't understand. Therefore you're a liar. I expect no less than apology from you, to resort to personal abuse after the moral high ground you use the report button about other posters, you of all people using abuse you report others for, do not address me unless you apologise, the whole forum can see your double standard hypocrisy in full swing.
shame on you andrewbrown
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 16:04:56 GMT
Grow up andrea, the fact you are swearing at me and being abusive which we know YOU would report other posters for especially jonksy, it is now in the 'national press' Bruce is a bias lefty, who tried to belittle and discredit a Reform panelist and came embarrassingly UNSTUCK.
Now stop with the personal abuse even though I'm not a cry baby like you running to the mods, someone else might report your abuse.
You are embarrassing yourself.
No. You are just wrong. I corrected you the first time, now you've repeated it twice since. You can't say you didn't understand. Therefore you're a liar. FACTS
Bruce was wrong she admitted it
Yusuf was rigth
Where is the lies?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Sept 28, 2024 16:11:14 GMT
No. You are just wrong. I corrected you the first time, now you've repeated it twice since. You can't say you didn't understand. Therefore you're a liar. I expect no less than apology from you, to resort to personal abuse after the moral high ground you use the report button about other posters, you of all people using abuse you report others for, do not address me unless you apologise, the whole forum can see your double standard hypocrisy in full swing.
shame on you andrewbrown
Don't think I've ever reported one of your posts? Paranoid much? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 28, 2024 16:11:41 GMT
BTW are you still allowed to use the word 'retard' in any capacity ?
I thought that word had been deemed socially unacceptable ??
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Sept 28, 2024 16:12:23 GMT
No. You are just wrong. I corrected you the first time, now you've repeated it twice since. You can't say you didn't understand. Therefore you're a liar. FACTS
Bruce was wrong she admitted it
Yusuf was rigth
Where is the lies?
The point is about the question that Fiona Bruce asked the audience. Clear that up and I'll retract my abuse. |
|
