|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 13, 2024 4:47:16 GMT
That's the low earning migrate What about the middle earners or high earners The immigrants are overrepresented in all faculty of the workforce Middle and high income earners do not come into the equation because the vast majority of immigrants are not middle to high income earners. The vast majority of immigrants are no skilled/low skilled which ensures there's a huge pool of unskilled labour in the workplace which obviously keeps shop floor pay down. Employment agencies absolutely exploded with the advent of mass immigration, and the British workforce never took a bigger kick in the teeth. Mass immigration is an absolute disaster for the is country. In effect the taxpayer is subsidising the low wages offered by big business.
Odd to see the left supporting that.
But then stupid is as stupid does.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 13, 2024 4:52:04 GMT
Hey it's an opinion. I'm glad the days of "No dogs no Irish no blacks" are gone, but are we in a better place today? I think not. I think we're in a decidedly worse place today than we were in 1968 when Enoch Powell correctly predicted the future. He certainly not predicted the future Not seen any rivers of blood Really?
And how many black teenagers have been stabbed to death over the last twenty years? And how many killed and injured by Islamist terrorism?
Plenty of blood there, doofus.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 7:33:49 GMT
He certainly not predicted the future Not seen any rivers of blood Really?
And how many black teenagers have been stabbed to death over the last twenty years? And how many killed and injured by Islamist terrorism?
Plenty of blood there, doofus.
The odd streams not rivers
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 13, 2024 7:39:11 GMT
Really?
And how many black teenagers have been stabbed to death over the last twenty years? And how many killed and injured by Islamist terrorism?
Plenty of blood there, doofus.
The odd streams not rivers "Like the Roman I see the Tiber foaming with much blood" There is no 'rivers of blood', that is press licence to seek a good headline. It is that there will be much blood spilt, which there has been, due primarily to the influx of migrants culturally, racially and religiously different.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 7:43:22 GMT
The odd streams not rivers "Like the Roman I see the Tiber foaming with much blood" There is no 'rivers of blood', that is press licence to seek a good headline. It is that there will be much blood spilt, which there has been, due primarily to the influx of migrants culturally, racially and religiously different. Surely over the time much of the Blood been spilt by white British. Bet mystic meg didn't see that one
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 13, 2024 7:45:41 GMT
Really?
And how many black teenagers have been stabbed to death over the last twenty years? And how many killed and injured by Islamist terrorism?
Plenty of blood there, doofus.
The odd streams not rivers Tell that to the victims families.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 13, 2024 7:47:17 GMT
"Like the Roman I see the Tiber foaming with much blood" There is no 'rivers of blood', that is press licence to seek a good headline. It is that there will be much blood spilt, which there has been, due primarily to the influx of migrants culturally, racially and religiously different. Surely over the time much of the Blood been spilt by white British. Bet mystic meg didn't see that one What were we saying about lefty whataboutery? (It fools no one, doofus).
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 7:48:09 GMT
The odd streams not rivers Tell that to the victims families. Im sure they grieve deeply but im sure they are realistic people .
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 7:49:22 GMT
Surely over the time much of the Blood been spilt by white British. Bet mystic meg didn't see that one What were we saying about lefty whataboutery? (It fools no one, doofus). Just stating a fact like it or not
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 13, 2024 8:12:24 GMT
"Like the Roman I see the Tiber foaming with much blood" There is no 'rivers of blood', that is press licence to seek a good headline. It is that there will be much blood spilt, which there has been, due primarily to the influx of migrants culturally, racially and religiously different. Surely over the time much of the Blood been spilt by white British. Bet mystic meg didn't see that one Well you are probably right but we are dealing with proportionality. If you have 1000 people of mixed groups X and Y and 800 in group X who account for 60 crimes and the other 200 of group Y accounts for 40 crimes most crime come from group X. Proportionally group Y account for more crime. All things being equal if the whole population was group X and Y did not exist then we would have much less crime instead of 100 crimes we would have 75. On the other hand if we were all group Y and X did not exist then we would have 200 crimes.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 8:20:00 GMT
Surely over the time much of the Blood been spilt by white British. Bet mystic meg didn't see that one Well you are probably right but we are dealing with proportionality. If you have 1000 people of mixed groups X and Y and 800 in group X who account for 60 crimes and the other 200 of group Y accounts for 40 crimes most crime come from group X. Proportionally group Y account for more crime. All things being equal if the whole population was group X and Y did not exist then we would have much less crime instead of 100 crimes we would have 75. On the other hand if we were all group Y and X did not exist then we would have 200 crimes. I'm probably right so Powell was wrong. And talking about xyz i bet x GROWTH GROWTH rate out shine there crime rate And y GROWTH rate in crime is higher than the GROWTH rate population
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 13, 2024 8:25:24 GMT
Well you are probably right but we are dealing with proportionality. If you have 1000 people of mixed groups X and Y and 800 in group X who account for 60 crimes and the other 200 of group Y accounts for 40 crimes most crime come from group X. Proportionally group Y account for more crime. All things being equal if the whole population was group X and Y did not exist then we would have much less crime instead of 100 crimes we would have 75. On the other hand if we were all group Y and X did not exist then we would have 200 crimes. I'm probably right so Powell was wrong. And talking about xyz i bet x GROWTH GROWTH rate out shine there crime rate And y GROWTH rate in crime is higher than the GROWTH rate population No you obviously missed the point and as regards the next bit you largely lost me and possibly yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 13, 2024 8:28:03 GMT
I'm probably right so Powell was wrong. And talking about xyz i bet x GROWTH GROWTH rate out shine there crime rate And y GROWTH rate in crime is higher than the GROWTH rate population No you obviously missed the point and as regards the next bit you largely lost me and possibly yourself. Never argue with an idiot...
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 8:35:29 GMT
I'm probably right so Powell was wrong. And talking about xyz i bet x GROWTH GROWTH rate out shine there crime rate And y GROWTH rate in crime is higher than the GROWTH rate population No you obviously missed the point and as regards the next bit you largely lost me and possibly yourself. Without the xyz analogies Im saying that over the past 20yrs The Ethnic population in Britain has Grown much higher the equivalent in crime Where has the white British population rate has decreased over the last 20yrs But the white British crime rate has increased over the last 20yrs
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 13, 2024 8:37:09 GMT
No you obviously missed the point and as regards the next bit you largely lost me and possibly yourself. Never argue with an idiot... Must be why i don't argue with you
|
|