|
|
Post by see2 on Sept 1, 2024 11:45:57 GMT
A painting and a statue for such an extremist and a dishonest individual, shows just how easily led by Tory propaganda so many people allow themselves to be. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Sept 1, 2024 11:51:02 GMT
I was not going to comment on this topic
But I changed my mind .... Starmer removes Thatcher potrait from 10 Downing Street
Who cares ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 1, 2024 11:51:59 GMT
I was not going to comment on this topic But I changed my mind .... Starmer removes Thatcher potrait from 10 Downing Street Who cares ? Starmer. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 1, 2024 13:03:52 GMT
I was not going to comment on this topic But I changed my mind .... Starmer removes Thatcher potrait from 10 Downing Street Who cares ? Starmer. Perhaps Starmer can use TSM's avatar as his portrait. He could hang it from Big Ben whilst BLM march up and down as part of his military parade. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Sept 1, 2024 13:06:54 GMT
Perhaps Starmer can use TSM's avatar as his portrait. He could hang it from Big Ben whilst BLM march up and down as part of his military parade. Careful, with talk like that you'll have fiddles locking himself in the closet with the Kleenex. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 1, 2024 13:16:03 GMT
I said she was the greatest female PM we ever had. She was not the greatest PM ever. But, she did some good. And a lot of social and financial damage. What was the social damage? |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Sept 1, 2024 14:45:05 GMT
I was not going to comment on this topic But I changed my mind .... Starmer removes Thatcher potrait from 10 Downing Street Who cares ? No he did not as he can't remove it from No10, he simply moved it to another location |
|
|
|
Post by vlk on Sept 1, 2024 16:37:23 GMT
Cheer up! It's only 4 years and 10 months away there's the next election.
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Sept 1, 2024 16:42:07 GMT
Cheer up! It's only 4 years and 10 months away there's the next election. One never knows it could be sooner than that  |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 1, 2024 17:50:11 GMT
And a lot of social and financial damage. What was the social damage? Perhaps the "There's no such things as society" statement that ushered in 2 generations of unfettered selfish greed. Just a guess. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 1, 2024 19:27:47 GMT
What was the social damage? Perhaps the "There's no such things as society" statement that ushered in 2 generations of unfettered selfish greed. Just a guess. All The Best Depends what you mean by society and 2 generations? The big bang was the main problem and if I recall NewLabour were pretty well enamoured with what Thatcher did but wanted the rest of the world to join us irrespective of what the peasants here wanted. |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Sept 2, 2024 0:08:29 GMT
Let's be honest, it is just another cynical populist action from Sir Flip Flop.
He stood on being the grown up, yet he is too dumb to see the optics of tearing down a picture of somebody who was a trailblazer for women.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 2, 2024 10:49:39 GMT
Let me point out again that this man ..the Prime minister of the UK …..found a picture of a woman do disturbing that he had to move it.
This’s is snow flake leftie needing a safe space in action .
“ The Prime Minister found the artwork “unsettling” and asked for it to be taken down, according to his biographer.”
Telegraph..
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Sept 2, 2024 15:54:26 GMT
Let me point out again that this man ..the Prime minister of the UK …..found a picture of a woman do disturbing that he had to move it. This’s is snow flake leftie needing a safe space in action . “ The Prime Minister found the artwork “unsettling” and asked for it to be taken down, according to his biographer.” Telegraph.. Well that is the Torygraph's version of things; hardly likely to try and be impartial about Starmer. There are many, many perfectly valid reasons to remove a picture from a wall, the most obvious one being "he just didn't like it". Like I said, who but a dyed-in-the-wool Tory with a dominatrix fetish would like it? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 2, 2024 15:58:25 GMT
Let me point out again that this man ..the Prime minister of the UK …..found a picture of a woman do disturbing that he had to move it. This’s is snow flake leftie needing a safe space in action . “ The Prime Minister found the artwork “unsettling” and asked for it to be taken down, according to his biographer.” Telegraph.. Well that is the Torygraph's version of things; hardly likely to try and be impartial about Starmer. There are many, many perfectly valid reasons to remove a picture from a wall, the most obvious one being "he just didn't like it". Like I said, who but a dyed-in-the-wool Tory with a dominatrix fetish would like it? All The Best So you associate Thatcher with a dominatrix fetish and Starmer finds her so unsettling he gets the portrait moved l It takes all sorts I suppose . |
|
