|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 3, 2022 15:22:34 GMT
More than HALF of voters believe immigration is now too high, GB News poll reveals. More than half of voters believe immigration is now too high - and a third would back a new political party focused on bringing levels down, a new poll reveals. The GB News opinion poll saw 54% describe levels as “too high” - and just four per cent said they felt numbers were “too low”. Among Leavers the concern about levels of immigration appear even greater with 81% stating immigration is too high, and only 5% saying it is about right or too low - Commenting on the findings, Professor Matthew Goodwin of the University of Kent said: These numbers underline the very high levels of public concern over the historically unprecedented level of immigration into the country. www.gbnews.uk/news/more-than-half-of-voters-believe-immigration-is-now-too-high-gb-news-poll-reveals/399858Mass illegal immigration from the safe EU state of France will ensure the Tories are trounced in 2024. |
|
|
|
Post by totheleft3 on Dec 3, 2022 16:39:38 GMT
Them that think immigration is to high .seem to be a lot lower then pre Brexit what I think was 70%+
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Dec 3, 2022 16:56:49 GMT
Them that think immigration is to high .seem to be a lot lower then pre Brexit what I think was 70%+ TTL, this poll suggests that even though a general election is less than two years away, the government are continuing to ignore more than half of the electorate, which is why a third of voters want a new party focused on immigration. This is not a recipe for re-election. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Dec 3, 2022 18:02:13 GMT
Well I know France is not great, but fear and despair at being there?..  |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Dec 4, 2022 7:45:08 GMT
The people smugglers give false promises of a better life.
They also carry guns and threaten to throw illegal immigrants overboard if they complain.
Killing off the business model of the people smugglers is vital, it may prove offensive to people like Gavin Esler to do that, but it is unacceptable to have people smuggling and people drowning in large numbers in the channel.
|
|
|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Dec 4, 2022 15:00:04 GMT
Well I know France is not great, but fear and despair at being there?.. Gavin Esler is a c***. There's fuck all risk in crossing the channel. They just get the dinghy into British waters and call the British Border Force or RNLI to take them to Dover. I'd leave them there. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 9:18:17 GMT
The people smugglers give false promises of a better life. They also carry guns and threaten to throw illegal immigrants overboard if they complain. Killing off the business model of the people smugglers is vital, it may prove offensive to people like Gavin Esler to do that, but it is unacceptable to have people smuggling and people drowning in large numbers in the channel. What the situation requires is legal routes of entry to claim asylum, and for the resources to process claims rapidly when they get here. That will eliminate the need for illegal and dangerous channel crossings. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 5, 2022 9:22:11 GMT
The people smugglers give false promises of a better life. They also carry guns and threaten to throw illegal immigrants overboard if they complain. Killing off the business model of the people smugglers is vital, it may prove offensive to people like Gavin Esler to do that, but it is unacceptable to have people smuggling and people drowning in large numbers in the channel. What the situation requires is legal routes of entry to claim asylum, and for the resources to process claims rapidly when they get here. That will eliminate the need for illegal and dangerous channel crossings. Legal routes already exist at much better prices than being a dinghy passenger. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Dec 5, 2022 9:36:18 GMT
The people smugglers give false promises of a better life. They also carry guns and threaten to throw illegal immigrants overboard if they complain. Killing off the business model of the people smugglers is vital, it may prove offensive to people like Gavin Esler to do that, but it is unacceptable to have people smuggling and people drowning in large numbers in the channel. What the situation requires is legal routes of entry to claim asylum, and for the resources to process claims rapidly when they get here. That will eliminate the need for illegal and dangerous channel crossings. There are legal ways to claim asylum. 1) Go to a British embassy, every embassy on the planet has the means to approve and provide asylum. 2) Everyone who wants asylum can get on a plane and fly direct from A-B and seek asylum after disembarking at the airport, or get on a ship and come here direct. When people start crossing multiple safe countries, facilitated by people smugglers, they cease to be asylum seekers, and become economic migrants. Undoubtably most of the blame lies with the people smugglers, who make more money the further they take people. But, some of the blame lies with economic migrants themselves. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63673925People such as this man, who absolutely wasn't an asylum seeker, but an economic migrant. He could have tried to get a visa, he might even have succeeded, but he chose to go with people smugglers and wasted his money. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 9:42:51 GMT
What the situation requires is legal routes of entry to claim asylum, and for the resources to process claims rapidly when they get here. That will eliminate the need for illegal and dangerous channel crossings. Legal routes already exist at much better prices than being a dinghy passenger. Not for most asylum seekers they don't, barring exceptions like people from Ukraine |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Dec 5, 2022 9:49:30 GMT
Legal routes already exist at much better prices than being a dinghy passenger. Not for most asylum seekers they don't, barring exceptions like people from Ukraine Please read Vinny's post. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 9:56:22 GMT
What the situation requires is legal routes of entry to claim asylum, and for the resources to process claims rapidly when they get here. That will eliminate the need for illegal and dangerous channel crossings. There are legal ways to claim asylum. 1) Go to a British embassy, every embassy on the planet has the means to approve and provide asylum. 2) Everyone who wants asylum can get on a plane and fly direct from A-B and seek asylum after disembarking at the airport, or get on a ship and come here direct. When people start crossing multiple safe countries, facilitated by people smugglers, they cease to be asylum seekers, and become economic migrants. Undoubtably most of the blame lies with the people smugglers, who make more money the further they take people. But, some of the blame lies with economic migrants themselves. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63673925People such as this man, who absolutely wasn't an asylum seeker, but an economic migrant. He could have tried to get a visa, he might even have succeeded, but he chose to go with people smugglers and wasted his money. Apart from selected groups like Afghans and Ukrainians, there are no legal routes into the UK to claim asylum, as Suella Braverman has herself been forced to admit under questioning from a fellow Tory MP. Asylum claims at British embassies are clearly not a legal means to enter the country because people have to enter the country to have such claims processed. I suggest you look at this.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAhN6YIsOUIAnd people cannot just get on a plane. They need a visa to be able to fly here. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 5, 2022 9:57:18 GMT
Not for most asylum seekers they don't, barring exceptions like people from Ukraine Please read Vinny's post. I have done. I suggest you look at this... www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAhN6YIsOUI |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Dec 5, 2022 9:57:53 GMT
There are legal ways to claim asylum. 1) Go to a British embassy, every embassy on the planet has the means to approve and provide asylum. 2) Everyone who wants asylum can get on a plane and fly direct from A-B and seek asylum after disembarking at the airport, or get on a ship and come here direct. When people start crossing multiple safe countries, facilitated by people smugglers, they cease to be asylum seekers, and become economic migrants. Undoubtably most of the blame lies with the people smugglers, who make more money the further they take people. But, some of the blame lies with economic migrants themselves. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-63673925People such as this man, who absolutely wasn't an asylum seeker, but an economic migrant. He could have tried to get a visa, he might even have succeeded, but he chose to go with people smugglers and wasted his money. Apart from selected groups like Afghans and Ukrainians, there are no legal routes into the UK to claim asylum, as Suella Braverman has herself been forced to admit under questioning from a fellow Tory MP. Asylum claims at British embassies are clearly not a legal means to enter the country because people have to enter the country to have such claims processed. I suggest you look at this.... www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAhN6YIsOUIWrong. Most countries have airports. Most countries have embassies. Any asylum seeker may go to a British embassy and seek asylum. They do not have to pay gangsters. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Dec 5, 2022 10:01:18 GMT
Legal routes already exist at much better prices than being a dinghy passenger. Not for most asylum seekers they don't, barring exceptions like people from Ukraine I have heard it said that approx one quarter of the world's population would qualify for refugee status on the current rules should they make a claim. Legal routes of asylum outside the country will see the number of claims go up ten fold. Do you have a number in mind that is too many? Turkey hosts about 4 million refugees currently or about 5% of her population. Could we cope with 3 million refugees. Probably but one would wonder what the country would look like and be like in the decades that followed. |
|
