|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 15, 2024 10:44:06 GMT
You know who's in charge of the Met and what it does and has been for his past three terms of office don't you? Ultra labour lefty , Citizen Khan that's who Yep, Citizen Khan't: An anti-police mayor in charge of policing. And we wonder why the police are less effective than they could be.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Aug 15, 2024 12:10:31 GMT
Ah, that's okay it's making gains in inclusion. That's what matters most. Rainbow coloured cars and taking the knee over something that happened in the states.
The Met can't be failing in the virtuous stakes.
It also doesn't help when your own mayor is telling you that crime is part and parcel of city life, and have a labour council advising you to hand over your possessions if you're ever mugged in London.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 15, 2024 12:14:41 GMT
Sadiq Khan is the man in charge of removing stop and search and causing them to do nothing about knife crime.
Back when Boris was mayor they shot armed drug dealers, now they don't.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 15, 2024 13:46:13 GMT
Sadiq Khan is the man in charge of removing stop and search and causing them to do nothing about knife crime. Back when Boris was mayor they shot armed drug dealers, now they don't. That's the problem when you have a politician in charge of the police: Khan is dependent on the votes of people who don't like stop & search. As is Lammy et al.
They don't actually care one iota about black kids getting stabbed. They just keep telling their parents that the police are the enemy and that it's all the fault of the police.
And more black kids get killed while they blame the police... And the downward sprial continues.
It's like having Benson & Hedges in charge of the NHS: "There's nothing wrong with smoking, it's the doctors' fault that people are dying..."
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 15, 2024 13:54:50 GMT
Stop and search saves lives, I don't care who it offends.
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Aug 15, 2024 13:57:30 GMT
Immigration was not a key issue in the 2010 general election, the number 1 issue was the economy in the aftermath of the 2007 - 2009 worldwide financial crisis and recession which followed. The number 1 lie which swung it ( just ) for Tories and their Lib Dem supporters, was that "it was all Labours fault", meaning the world wide banking crisis and recession which hit many nations. In 2010 the public satisfaction rate of the NHS was at a record high It wasn't an issue because EVERY party said they would reduce it . They shut down the debate and every party elected since has promised the same and failed to deliver . So we have to assume its an all party policy to keep immigration high against the wishes of the British people . And you wonder why people turn to the right ?
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 15, 2024 14:26:03 GMT
Stop and search saves lives, I don't care who it offends. Me neither, but Khan't does because his position depends on telling the permanently offended what they want to hear.
"Your kids are dying because you're shit parents" doesn't win votes.
"The police are racist" does.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 15, 2024 14:26:53 GMT
Immigration was not a key issue in the 2010 general election, the number 1 issue was the economy in the aftermath of the 2007 - 2009 worldwide financial crisis and recession which followed. The number 1 lie which swung it ( just ) for Tories and their Lib Dem supporters, was that "it was all Labours fault", meaning the world wide banking crisis and recession which hit many nations. In 2010 the public satisfaction rate of the NHS was at a record high It matters little if immigration was a 'key' issue all that matters is what did the manifestoes say would be done about immigration. It is one of the reasons the BNP got over half a million votes in 2010 as they stated clearly what would happen, so all the other parties had to state clearly how they would reduce and control immigration in order to take potential votes from the BNP. It turns out these manifestoes were just so much garbage. Part of the lying campaign against the BNP was the 2009 EHRC report on the allocation of social housing to immigrants which 'found no evidence' of preference but ignored the main factor in deciding that of what allocations went to whom. As a piece of statistical bunkum it did not try to disguise its nonsensical findings but the MSM heralded its conclusions with alacrity over the main headlines. That was straightforward government propaganda that the MSM participated in wholeheartedly and directly lied to the electorate. Too open and too often leads to unrest.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 15, 2024 14:31:16 GMT
Who could argue against this:
Control immigration through our Australian-style points-based system, ensuring that as growth returns we see rising levels of employment and wages, not rising immigration, and requiring newcomers to earn citizenship and the entitlements it brings.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 15, 2024 15:19:54 GMT
I've voted Labour just twice. I've voted Tory 3 times, UKIP twice, and BNP, Liberal and Independent just once. All The Best That's really interesting and appears to show how even handed you are. Who's turn is it next? Maybe Reform or the Greens? I genuinely try to vote for whichever candidate in my constituency I feel best addresses the needs of the constituency. There are only two times I have not; the time I voted BNP (I knew they couldn't get in, but I'd rather register a protest vote than no vote at all); and this last vote where I voted Labour, because our Tory candidate had done bugger all for the constituency, and I felt it more important to get the Tories out (and this is a close run constituency between Lab and Tory). Would I vote for Reform? If I felt they expressed the best interests of the constituency I would. Same for the Greens. Based on how things were at the last local elections I might be persuaded to opt for the Greens next time around. But then who knows, my political views may have shifted by then; I am not wedded to a particular political ideology. I just opt for who I think is offering the best solutions for the problems at the time. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 15, 2024 15:20:59 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0qe1g4g751oThe Met is failing in almost all areas. It is Adequate in just one area, it is Good or Outstanding in none. 14 Years of Ideological cuts gets you a completely failing Police Service. And that fucking loon Truss, and her right-wing ilk, want to cut Public Spending even further. The Tories wanted to cut Public Spending to make Public Services bad enough that enough people would be fooled into wanting them all privatised. All The Best You know who's in charge of the Met and what it does and has been for his past three terms of office don't you? Ultra labour lefty , Citizen Khan that's who Yes, I know. Do you know who sets his budget, and mandates where some of it has to be spent? Westminster - which has for 14 years been under Tory rule. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 15, 2024 15:23:14 GMT
Who could argue against this: Control immigration through our Australian-style points-based system, ensuring that as growth returns we see rising levels of employment and wages, not rising immigration, and requiring newcomers to earn citizenship and the entitlements it brings. In principle not a bad idea. The devil is in the details though, and it depends entirely on how points are accrued. Of course the real problem is the real shot-callers definitely don't want higher wages and higher employment; both of those eat into profit margins. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Aug 15, 2024 15:55:40 GMT
That's really interesting and appears to show how even handed you are. Who's turn is it next? Maybe Reform or the Greens? I genuinely try to vote for whichever candidate in my constituency I feel best addresses the needs of the constituency. There are only two times I have not; the time I voted BNP (I knew they couldn't get in, but I'd rather register a protest vote than no vote at all); and this last vote where I voted Labour, because our Tory candidate had done bugger all for the constituency, and I felt it more important to get the Tories out (and this is a close run constituency between Lab and Tory). Would I vote for Reform? If I felt they expressed the best interests of the constituency I would. Same for the Greens. Based on how things were at the last local elections I might be persuaded to opt for the Greens next time around. But then who knows, my political views may have shifted by then; I am not wedded to a particular political ideology. I just opt for who I think is offering the best solutions for the problems at the time. All The Best This is merely your personal opinion of what you think is best for your constituency (using unspecified criteria) and that you are not wedded to a particular political ideology although you didn't apply it in July this year because you felt it more important to get the Tories out?Other valid personal opinions are available
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 15, 2024 17:14:57 GMT
I genuinely try to vote for whichever candidate in my constituency I feel best addresses the needs of the constituency. There are only two times I have not; the time I voted BNP (I knew they couldn't get in, but I'd rather register a protest vote than no vote at all); and this last vote where I voted Labour, because our Tory candidate had done bugger all for the constituency, and I felt it more important to get the Tories out (and this is a close run constituency between Lab and Tory). Would I vote for Reform? If I felt they expressed the best interests of the constituency I would. Same for the Greens. Based on how things were at the last local elections I might be persuaded to opt for the Greens next time around. But then who knows, my political views may have shifted by then; I am not wedded to a particular political ideology. I just opt for who I think is offering the best solutions for the problems at the time. All The Best This is merely your personal opinion of what you think is best for your constituency (using unspecified criteria) and that you are not wedded to a particular political ideology although you didn't apply it in July this year because you felt it more important to get the Tories out?Other valid personal opinions are available Well of course it is my personal opinion. Is anyone actually dumb enough to cast a vote swayed by anything other than their own opinion? No I didn't vote based on ideology this summer; I voted based on the facts that the Tories had already tried for 14 years to turn the country around and had abjectly failed, not on any ideological policy grounds. If voting MRLP was the surest way of avoiding the Tories winning the constituency again that is who I would have voted for. All The Best
|
|