|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 20:29:39 GMT
Nope. What you are saying is that you can’t support your claim that “All are at least very suggestive that Christian theology condones, or at least turns a blind-eye to, paedophilia.” But will not admit it . None of your extracts supports sex with pre pubescent children just as none of your extracts supports eating pre pubescent children but according to you because it doesn’t specifically condemn it then it supports it. Fuck this is so easy for me. The extracts I quoted could all easily and reasonably be read to indicate that the Bible condones paedophilia. That you can't see that is, I suggest, because of your blind faith, if not in the church itself, but in the position of the church in our society. All The Best Not blind faith . Just the ability to read words on a page and not ones engraved in your shoulder chip. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 20:32:24 GMT
The extracts I quoted could all easily and reasonably be read to indicate that the Bible condones paedophilia. That you can't see that is, I suggest, because of your blind faith, if not in the church itself, but in the position of the church in our society. All The Best Not blind faith . Just the ability to read words on a page and not ones engraved in your shoulder chip. OK, you can read, but clearly can't understand what you read. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 20:34:32 GMT
Not blind faith . Just the ability to read words on a page and not ones engraved in your shoulder chip. OK, you can read, but clearly can't understand what you read. All The Best lol. You made a claim that you failed to back up and it me that can’t read . Fuck it’s so easy for me .. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 20:50:41 GMT
I think we need to make PVs position clear .
He says Christianity supports having sex with pre pubescent children because the pre Christian biblical texts he provided never mentioned having sex with pre pubescent children .
lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 21:12:30 GMT
I think we need to make PVs position clear . He says Christianity supports having sex with pre pubescent children because the pre Christian biblical texts he provided never mentioned having sex with pre pubescent children . lol. Why lie about me? Is that the best you've got? It is a FACT that the Bible is a Prohibitive Text - it tells us what we should not to We shouldn't kill, steal, covet, have graven images, bear false witness, mix fibres in out clothing, eat shellfish, or plant mixed crops. At the other end there are hundreds of tasks we carry out every day that the Bible has never told us to do, brush our teeth, wipe our arses, put the trash out, etc. From this we can determine that the Bible is NOT a Prescriptive Text. These are both quite easy to understand. Then there are verses that can, and have by people far more educated than me in these matters, be interpreted that the Bible turns a blind-eye to child sex abuse, and one that actually condones it. Then we have both the Catholic Church and Church Of England helping paedophile hide: why would they do that if paedophilia was prohibited by Church Doctrine? There's a picture forming here, and it is NOT one of an organisation or faith that actively prohibits paedophilia. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 21:20:14 GMT
I think we need to make PVs position clear . He says Christianity supports having sex with pre pubescent children because the pre Christian biblical texts he provided never mentioned having sex with pre pubescent children . lol. Why lie about me? Is that the best you've got? It is a FACT that the Bible is a Prohibitive Text - it tells us what we should not to We shouldn't kill, steal, covet, have graven images, bear false witness, mix fibres in out clothing, eat shellfish, or plant mixed crops. At the other end there are hundreds of tasks we carry out every day that the Bible has never told us to do, brush our teeth, wipe our arses, put the trash out, etc. From this we can determine that the Bible is NOT a Prescriptive Text. These are both quite easy to understand. Then there are verses that can, and have by people far more educated than me in these matters, be interpreted that the Bible turns a blind-eye to child sex abuse, and one that actually condones it. Then we have both the Catholic Church and Church Of England helping paedophile hide: why would they do that if paedophilia was prohibited by Church Doctrine? There's a picture forming here, and it is NOT one of an organisation or faith that actively prohibits paedophilia. All The Best I didn’t lie. I made your idiotic position clear . According to you because your pre Christian texts didn’t support sex with children , that means Christianity supports sex with Children . It’s absurd, it’s pathetic tbh. Here’s the thing , because your pre Christian texts doesn’t support eating childrens brain …it means Christianity support eating children’s brains. You are a doofus . It’s official now. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 21:32:32 GMT
Why lie about me? Is that the best you've got? It is a FACT that the Bible is a Prohibitive Text - it tells us what we should not to We shouldn't kill, steal, covet, have graven images, bear false witness, mix fibres in out clothing, eat shellfish, or plant mixed crops. At the other end there are hundreds of tasks we carry out every day that the Bible has never told us to do, brush our teeth, wipe our arses, put the trash out, etc. From this we can determine that the Bible is NOT a Prescriptive Text. These are both quite easy to understand. Then there are verses that can, and have by people far more educated than me in these matters, be interpreted that the Bible turns a blind-eye to child sex abuse, and one that actually condones it. Then we have both the Catholic Church and Church Of England helping paedophile hide: why would they do that if paedophilia was prohibited by Church Doctrine? There's a picture forming here, and it is NOT one of an organisation or faith that actively prohibits paedophilia. All The Best I didn’t lie. I made your idiotic position clear . According to you because your pre Christian texts didn’t support sex with children , that means Christianity supports sex with Children . It’s absurd, it’s pathetic tbh. Here’s the thing , because your pre Christian texts doesn’t support eating childrens brain …it means Christianity support eating children’s brains. You are a doofus . It’s official now. Hey, if you want to admit the basic point laid in my previous post are too difficult for you to grasp, just ask. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 21:36:44 GMT
I didn’t lie. I made your idiotic position clear . According to you because your pre Christian texts didn’t support sex with children , that means Christianity supports sex with Children . It’s absurd, it’s pathetic tbh. Here’s the thing , because your pre Christian texts doesn’t support eating childrens brain …it means Christianity support eating children’s brains. You are a doofus . It’s official now. Hey, if you want to admit the basic point laid in my previous post are too difficult for you to grasp, just ask. All The Best You didn’t have a point . You had a claim that you couldn’t back up,. Now tell me what we are going to do about these brain eating Christians. After all the pre Christian texts that you posted didn’t specifically say that you can’t eat children’s brain so obviously Christianity supports it . Yes you are that ridiculous. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 21:40:34 GMT
I am saying Christianity DOES NOT condemn paedophilia. That is demonstrably true. All The Best Nope. What you are saying is that you can’t support your claim that “All are at least very suggestive that Christian theology condones, or at least turns a blind-eye to, paedophilia.” But will not admit it . None of your extracts supports sex with pre pubescent children just as none of your extracts supports eating pre pubescent children but according to you because it doesn’t specifically condemn it then it supports it. Fuck this is so easy for me. I think we can conclude that he's talking a lot of nonsense to deflect from the fact that in some places under Islam they allow grown men to marry children, and more than one at a time. This happens because there is no seperation of state from scripture and hadiths, and to try and challenge it would be blasphemy. Labour want to make criticism of this illegal under their Islamophobia laws, whilst Islamists want Sharia laws and their cultural norms to take preference over English laws and English culture. This permanent state of war will continue. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 21:46:22 GMT
Nope. What you are saying is that you can’t support your claim that “All are at least very suggestive that Christian theology condones, or at least turns a blind-eye to, paedophilia.” But will not admit it . None of your extracts supports sex with pre pubescent children just as none of your extracts supports eating pre pubescent children but according to you because it doesn’t specifically condemn it then it supports it. Fuck this is so easy for me. I think we can conclude that he's talking a lot of nonsense to deflect from the fact that in some places under Islam they allow grown men to marry children, and more than one at a time. This happens because there is no seperation of state from scripture and hadiths, and to try and challenge it would be blasphemy. Labour want to make criticism of this illegal under their Islamophobia laws, whilst Islamists want Sharia laws and their cultural norms to take preference over English laws and English culture. This permanent state of war will continue. He making Claims about Christianity by posting PRE Christian biblical texts that do not support his claims . He is compounding his idiocy by saying that they must support it because they do specifically condemn it . He needs to get a grip. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 21:53:44 GMT
I think we can conclude that he's talking a lot of nonsense to deflect from the fact that in some places under Islam they allow grown men to marry children, and more than one at a time. This happens because there is no seperation of state from scripture and hadiths, and to try and challenge it would be blasphemy. Labour want to make criticism of this illegal under their Islamophobia laws, whilst Islamists want Sharia laws and their cultural norms to take preference over English laws and English culture. This permanent state of war will continue. He making Claims about Christianity by posting PRE Christian biblical texts that do not support his claims . He is compounding his idiocy by saying that they must support it because they do specifically condemn it . He needs to get a grip. Sadly, his trolling, flaming and lying is all over this board now. My guess is that this site has been targeted by the Hamas supporters and the far-left, while Starmer is attacking free-speech and Social Media. Still, it may still be helpful as an exposure, but I wouldn't expect an actual intelligent discussion from them. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 22:17:09 GMT
Hey, if you want to admit the basic point laid in my previous post are too difficult for you to grasp, just ask. All The Best You didn’t have a point . You had a claim that you couldn’t back up,. Now tell me what we are going to do about these brain eating Christians. After all the pre Christian texts that you posted didn’t specifically say that you can’t eat children’s brain so obviously Christianity supports it . Yes you are that ridiculous. I have never made a claim about brain eating Christians - that was you. Ergo, no need for me to respond to it. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 22:19:10 GMT
He making Claims about Christianity by posting PRE Christian biblical texts that do not support his claims . He is compounding his idiocy by saying that they must support it because they do specifically condemn it . He needs to get a grip. Sadly, his trolling, flaming and lying is all over this board now. My guess is that this site has been targeted by the Hamas supporters and the far-left, while Starmer is attacking free-speech and Social Media. Still, it may still be helpful as an exposure, but I wouldn't expect an actual intelligent discussion from them. Just because someone disagrees with you, or calls out your serial lying does not make them "far left" or "Hamas supporters". All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 22:20:53 GMT
You didn’t have a point . You had a claim that you couldn’t back up,. Now tell me what we are going to do about these brain eating Christians. After all the pre Christian texts that you posted didn’t specifically say that you can’t eat children’s brain so obviously Christianity supports it . Yes you are that ridiculous. I have never made a claim about brain eating Christians - that was you. Ergo, no need for me to respond to it. All The Best I’m just using your idiot logic that claims if a pre Christian biblical text doesn’t mention something then Christianity must support it . You started it . |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 22:27:10 GMT
Sadly, his trolling, flaming and lying is all over this board now. My guess is that this site has been targeted by the Hamas supporters and the far-left, while Starmer is attacking free-speech and Social Media. Still, it may still be helpful as an exposure, but I wouldn't expect an actual intelligent discussion from them. Just because someone disagrees with you, or calls out your serial lying does not make them "far left" or "Hamas supporters". All The Best But I'm not serial lying, and have made attempts to engage in the topic whilst you're flaming and trolling the forum posting bullshit. Look around, even your comrades have bailed on you. |
|
