|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 22:43:48 GMT
I have never made a claim about brain eating Christians - that was you. Ergo, no need for me to respond to it. All The Best I’m just using your idiot logic that claims if a pre Christian biblical text doesn’t mention something then Christianity must support it . You started it . No, I really didn't. That you think I did shows you have misunderstood everything I wrote. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 22:47:18 GMT
I’m just using your idiot logic that claims if a pre Christian biblical text doesn’t mention something then Christianity must support it . You started it . No, I really didn't. That you think I did shows you have misunderstood everything I wrote. All The Best Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 22:49:27 GMT
Just because someone disagrees with you, or calls out your serial lying does not make them "far left" or "Hamas supporters". All The Best But I'm not serial lying, and have made attempts to engage in the topic whilst you're flaming and trolling the forum posting bullshit. Look around, even your comrades have bailed on you. Really? So you've provided evidence for the ridiculous claims you have made? "Labour importing murderers to attack British citizens", "Labour killing millions", "anyone who disagrees with is a Hamas supporter". No, no you haven't. Meanwhile, no one has provided any evidence at all that anything I have posted is "bullshit", at best there is a difference of opinion. I don't have comrades here; but then truth is not a democracy, so it doesn't matter. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 22:50:48 GMT
No, I really didn't. That you think I did shows you have misunderstood everything I wrote. All The Best Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. All he does is post lies and deranged bullshit, whilst trying to project that behaviour onto others. Bascially, he's a flame troll. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 22:55:48 GMT
Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. All he does is post lies and deranged bullshit, whilst trying to project that behaviour onto others. Bascially, he's a flame troll. We go back a long way . You get used to him after about 10 years . |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:04:28 GMT
No, I really didn't. That you think I did shows you have misunderstood everything I wrote. All The Best Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. OK, let me explain it step by step for you. The Bible is NOT prescriptive, it IS Prohibitive. Do you understand the difference? The Bible condemns many, many things that it thinks are morally objectionable, even down to lying or being jealous. Child Abuse is NOT among them. There ARE Bible verses that can be read as condoning Child Abuse, that they are Old Testament is wholly irrelevant. The Council of Nicaea in AD 325 went to great lengths to expunge non-official doctrine; that this has not been done with the Old Testament indicates that it is still considered official doctrine. At the same time we have two Churches who follow the doctrines of the Bible actively engaged in protecting paedophiles. Individually none of them are a "smoking gun", all taken together gets very, very close to being one. You are smart enough to grasp that a cogent argument is neither built upon, nor undermined, by a single point; but requires a cumulative weight of evidence. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:05:48 GMT
Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. and deranged bullshit, whilst trying to project that behaviour onto others. Bascially, he's a flame troll. Please demonstrate that I have lied. Your lies to date have been easy to demonstrate, Labour has not killed Millions as you claimed. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:06:26 GMT
All he does is post lies and deranged bullshit, whilst trying to project that behaviour onto others. Bascially, he's a flame troll. You get used to him after about 10 years . Do we? I haven't even been here a year yet. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 23:06:52 GMT
All he does is post lies and deranged bullshit, whilst trying to project that behaviour onto others. Bascially, he's a flame troll. We go back a long way . You get used to him after about 10 years . Steppenwolf started a thread to cover a specific topic and all that the flame troll is doing is posting bullshit about Christians eating people and fucking kids to deflect from the topic. I see little point to wasting more time on him, and since the forum is even worse than when I left it I guess the rival troll farm forum has been somewhat of a success. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:09:07 GMT
We go back a long way . You get used to him after about 10 years . Steppenwolf started a thread to cover a specific topic and all that the flame trolling is doing is posting bullshit about Christians eating people and fucking kids to deflect from the topic. I see little point to wasting more time on him, and since the forum is even worse than when I left it I guess the rival troll farm forum has been somewhat of a success. Another lie. That wasn't me, it was Bentley. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 23:12:19 GMT
Yes you did . That you think otherwise shows that you misunderstood everything you said . Which tbh is no surprise. OK, let me explain it step by step for you. The Bible is NOT prescriptive, it IS Prohibitive. Do you understand the difference? The Bible condemns many, many things that it thinks are morally objectionable, even down to lying or being jealous. Child Abuse is NOT among them. There ARE Bible verses that can be read as condoning Child Abuse, that they are Old Testament is wholly irrelevant. The Council of Nicaea in AD 325 went to great lengths to expunge non-official doctrine; that this has not been done with the Old Testament indicates that it is still considered official doctrine. At the same time we have two Churches who follow the doctrines of the Bible actively engaged in protecting paedophiles. Individually none of them are a "smoking gun", all taken together gets very, very close to being one. You are smart enough to grasp that a cogent argument is neither built upon, nor undermined, by a single point; but requires a cumulative weight of evidence. All The Best Let me explain to you in one easy step . None of the pre Christian biblical texts that you posted supports your claim regarding Christianity supporting sex with pre pubescent girls. None of the waffle you posted afterwards refutes that . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 13, 2024 23:17:12 GMT
Steppenwolf started a thread to cover a specific topic and all that the flame trolling is doing is posting bullshit about Christians eating people and fucking kids to deflect from the topic. I see little point to wasting more time on him, and since the forum is even worse than when I left it I guess the rival troll farm forum has been somewhat of a success. Another lie. That wasn't me, it was Bentley. All The Best Well in all fairness , you posted the bollocks about Old Testament texts supporting your claim that Christianity supports child abuse and I pointed out that one could use your idiotic logic to claim pre Christian could equally support a claim that Christianity supports eating people . |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:17:14 GMT
OK, let me explain it step by step for you. The Bible is NOT prescriptive, it IS Prohibitive. Do you understand the difference? The Bible condemns many, many things that it thinks are morally objectionable, even down to lying or being jealous. Child Abuse is NOT among them. There ARE Bible verses that can be read as condoning Child Abuse, that they are Old Testament is wholly irrelevant. The Council of Nicaea in AD 325 went to great lengths to expunge non-official doctrine; that this has not been done with the Old Testament indicates that it is still considered official doctrine. At the same time we have two Churches who follow the doctrines of the Bible actively engaged in protecting paedophiles. Individually none of them are a "smoking gun", all taken together gets very, very close to being one. You are smart enough to grasp that a cogent argument is neither built upon, nor undermined, by a single point; but requires a cumulative weight of evidence. All The Best None of the pre Christian biblical texts that you posted supports your claim regarding Christianity supporting sex with pre pubescent girls. . Oh fuck me. That is because the Bible is NOT Prescriptive. It IS Prohibitive. If you don't understand the difference, just ask; though I have posted it numerous times already. Are you denying that the Old Testament is a part of Christian Doctrine? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 13, 2024 23:20:20 GMT
Your lies to date have been easy to demonstrate, Labour has not killed Millions as you claimed. ^^ The forum's flame troll claims I am lying, whilst the flame troll is pulling nonsense out of his arse and attributing them to me whilst hiding behind dishonesty and ignorance. That post related to the disinformation the previous Labour government was relying on to engage in wars, which resulted in the death of millions. The Labour party gave their support to those wars based on disinformation, which was later admitted by US politicians who actually tried to apologise over that disinformation. Sadly, since the flame troll is a liar even after it is explained to him he will maintain his lies.
This is what this forum is now, and to think this is meant to be Mind Zone.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 13, 2024 23:21:46 GMT
Another lie. That wasn't me, it was Bentley. All The Best and I pointed out that one could use your idiotic logic to claim pre Christian could equally support a claim that Christianity supports eating people . That is another lie. I have not claimed that. I have claimed that the Bible does not prohibit it AND that the Bible is a Prohibitive Text and not a Prescriptive Text (which is what would be needed for it to support things). Has there been any evidence that the Church (Catholic or CoE) has been institutionally involved in cannibalism? There is ample evidence that the Church (both Catholic and CoE) has been institutionally involved in Child Abuse, and the protection of those engaged in it. Do you not see how that makes a difference. All The Best |
|
