|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 20, 2024 0:08:35 GMT
Fiddles will never accept any suggestion of wrongdoing by his brethren, despite any evidence offered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 20, 2024 6:41:10 GMT
I still want to know why the person who instigated all this, the man on the flight who racially abused the suspects mother has not been arrested or questioned. 1 - you do not know that he instigated anything 2 - you do not know that he racially abused anyone 3 - he has gone back home to Kuwait. ..all of which has absolutely nothing to do with these two thugs launching an unprovoked attack on the Police. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Aug 20, 2024 7:39:37 GMT
A police officer stamped on a suspects head, he also kicked a suspect in the head whilst laid, faced down on the ground after been tasered, at the time of the ASSAULT by the police officer, another officer was stood facing the suspect with a Taser aimed at him. If you cannot see that this is a cut and dried case of unecessary assault then you need your head examining - police officers DO NOT stamp on suspects heads, or kick suspects in the head. No double standards at all, its a clear cut case of a police officer going too far - End Of. When the guy on the ground broke the policewoman's nose was that a case of 'unnecessary assault'? Notice how witchfinder ignores such questions. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 20, 2024 8:01:36 GMT
Of course he can you idiot . If that person was a real and present threat to him and the people around him . But he made absolutely no attempt what so ever to (A) get up of the floor or (B) to grab a police weapon, he was laid on the floor, he had been Tasered, he was SURROUNDED by police officers, one of which was holding a Taser aimed at the man on the floor. You are making excuses for a police officer who kicked an unarmed man in the head whilst lying faced down on the floor, you have not a leg to stand on, neither has the police officer. Your argument is just nonsense, its garbbage. I expect the police officer to be charged with assault - but I also expect the suspect to be also charged with assault against an emergency worker. I still want to know why the person who instigated all this, the man on the flight who racially abused the suspects mother has not been arrested or questioned. Yes he did make an attempt he raised his head as though to rise. You need to watch the video again. He was surrounded by police two of whom were watching the brother who had apparently surrendered but had attacked police from behind before, one woman officer was streaming blood from a broken nose, the other officer had been knocked to the ground at some point and was of uncertain condition and the policeman who did the kick had also been thrown to the ground and had just raised and needed to instantly get the upper hand in a very dangerous situation. The man was told not to get up, appeared to try and was instantly subdued. Given the evidence of what happened and the situation he was in at that precise moment winning was all for the safety of himself, his colleagues and the public. He should get a medal. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 20, 2024 8:41:42 GMT
Of course he can you idiot . If that person was a real and present threat to him and the people around him . But he made absolutely no attempt what so ever to (A) get up of the floor or (B) to grab a police weapon, he was laid on the floor, he had been Tasered, he was SURROUNDED by police officers, one of which was holding a Taser aimed at the man on the floor. You are making excuses for a police officer who kicked an unarmed man in the head whilst lying faced down on the floor, you have not a leg to stand on, neither has the police officer. Your argument is just nonsense, its garbbage. I expect the police officer to be charged with assault - but I also expect the suspect to be also charged with assault against an emergency worker. I still want to know why the person who instigated all this, the man on the flight who racially abused the suspects mother has not been arrested or questioned. Liar. The man refused to comply with the policeman. He reared his torso up while the woman hanging over him . He presented a possible danger to the police officer. Had he stayed still and the stupid woman moved away the officer would not have had to react in the way he did . Yes I believe that you are more interested in an alleged racial abuse and to vilify an officer doing his job that a serious assault on officers that did not know if this was a prelude to a terrorist attack. You are pathetic. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 20, 2024 9:20:58 GMT
When the guy on the ground broke the policewoman's nose was that a case of 'unnecessary assault'? Notice how witchfinder ignores such questions. Completely irrelevant, and a totally ridiculous point It does not matter two hoops what the suspect / defendant did, no police officer can kick a suspect in the head. |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Aug 20, 2024 9:27:19 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence.
For fucks sake.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 20, 2024 9:33:42 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence. For fucks sake. Do you think that the rioters who attacked the police should also be kicked in the head? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 20, 2024 9:36:47 GMT
Here is a list of accepted means of restraint from THE COLLEGE OF POLICING
(quote) "In recording the use of force, officers and staff should use the following categories"
baton/ASP
Taser
incapacitant spray
handcuffs
open hand techniques
prone restraint
Interestingly, the Code Of Conduct stipulates that if any kind of injury has been sustained, the arresting officer(s) must consider removing the prisoner directly to hospital.
The Regulations also state that when arriving at a Custody Suite, the arresting officers MUST inform the custody officers of the precise nature of any force used during the arrest.
Now - I wonder if those officers informed the custody officers that they deemed it to be necessary to stamp on the mans head, and kick him in the head ... I bet they bloody well didn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 20, 2024 9:45:20 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence. For fucks sake. Do you think that the rioters who attacked the police should also be kicked in the head? Yes, it's a occupational hazard. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 20, 2024 9:46:42 GMT
Has anyone got the image of that idiot rioter who got whacked on the head with a brick then turned round and got one in the bollocks LOL ....
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 20, 2024 9:47:22 GMT
Here is a list of accepted means of restraint from THE COLLEGE OF POLICING (quote) "In recording the use of force, officers and staff should use the following categories" baton/ASP Taser incapacitant spray handcuffs open hand techniques prone restraint Interestingly, the Code Of Conduct stipulates that if any kind of injury has been sustained, the arresting officer(s) must consider removing the prisoner directly to hospital. The Regulations also state that when arriving at a Custody Suite, the arresting officers MUST inform the custody officers of the precise nature of any force used during the arrest. Now - I wonder if those officers informed the custody officers that they deemed it to be necessary to stamp on the mans head, and kick him in the head ... I bet they bloody well didn't. You idiot . How could the armed officer use prone restraint on a potential attacker who could try to take his weapon , was attempting to get up and with a potential attacker hanging over him . This wasn’t a scuffle outside a pub , it was a full on assault on airport police , with all the potential dangers that go with it . This could easily have been a diversion for a full on terrorist attack . The quickest and easiest way to control an attacker is to hit them first and control them straight after . |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 20, 2024 9:48:06 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence. For fucks sake. Do you think that the rioters who attacked the police should also be kicked in the head? Looking at some of teh Downing street arrests they were certainly punched in the head and taken down violently. If a police officer is in fear of his safety then overcoming a violent aggressive individual becomes paramount, if a kick in the head does it so be it. No two tier policing here. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 20, 2024 9:49:54 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence. For fucks sake. Do you think that the rioters who attacked the police should also be kicked in the head? In a similar circumstance, they should be subject to a similar response. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 20, 2024 10:01:54 GMT
He wasn't a "suspect", he was a violent criminal out of control who had broken the nose of a police lady and was violently attacking other police officers, he may have had a concealed weapon and so the police officer carried out an instant restraint to prevent further violence. For fucks sake. Do you think that the rioters who attacked the police should also be kicked in the head? The police are there to 'protect the innocent public' just like they were doing at a Major airport, if this would have kicked off in any other country across the world in the manner it did in Manchester I can guarantee you they would have been shot dead, and the police would face NO criminal investigation, the family involved in this violent disorder at Manchester should send a letter of apology and thanks to the police for not shooting them dead. |
|
