|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 19, 2024 11:23:24 GMT
The far right is anyone who believes a person should be a target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group. This man Jones is no better than the scum he was referring to ( racists / the far right / rioters ), and my guess is that the CPS are working out what offence to charge him with in order that he stands the best chance of been convicted. So the antisemitic left are actually "Far Right"?
Mind you, that said I've always maintained that the fascists/Nazis etc were actually far left.
Rather like Labour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 19, 2024 11:24:52 GMT
The far right is anyone who believes a person should be a target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group. This man Jones is no better than the scum he was referring to ( racists / the far right / rioters ), and my guess is that the CPS are working out what offence to charge him with in order that he stands the best chance of been convicted. Working on your own theory the far left is anyone who believes a person should be target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group ....... which will apply to ex-Councilor Jones who by your own definition is far-left. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 19, 2024 11:43:41 GMT
The far right is anyone who believes a person should be a target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group. This man Jones is no better than the scum he was referring to ( racists / the far right / rioters ), and my guess is that the CPS are working out what offence to charge him with in order that he stands the best chance of been convicted. Most people I know do not believe that however what they do believe is that the country is being inundated by too many people of different ethnicities to too great a degree and too quickly for the good of all. They are still called far right. Racists and far right are defined by the left and it does indicate that millions of people would fall into the bracket of having their throats slit as a justified action. EDIT as an addition in Bournemouth there are anti mass immigration protests and they are counter protested by anti-fascists. So it is clear how the left define |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 19, 2024 12:02:03 GMT
The far right is anyone who believes a person should be a target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group. This man Jones is no better than the scum he was referring to ( racists / the far right / rioters ), and my guess is that the CPS are working out what offence to charge him with in order that he stands the best chance of been convicted. Most people I know do not believe that however what they do believe is that the country is being inundated by too many people of different ethnicities to too great a degree and too quickly for the good of all. They are still called far right. Racists and far right are defined by the left and it does indicate that millions of people would fall into the bracket of having their throats slit as a justified action.EDIT as an addition in Bournemouth there are anti mass immigration protests and they are counter protested by anti-fascists. So it is clear how the left define Exactly. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Aug 19, 2024 19:57:16 GMT
The far right is anyone who believes a person should be a target of hate, violence, abuse or assault simply because that person is a different colour, faith, ethnic group. This man Jones is no better than the scum he was referring to ( racists / the far right / rioters ), and my guess is that the CPS are working out what offence to charge him with in order that he stands the best chance of been convicted. So the antisemitic left are actually "Far Right"?
Mind you, that said I've always maintained that the fascists/Nazis etc were actually far left.
Rather like Labour.
Like always your wrong |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 19, 2024 20:10:27 GMT
So the antisemitic left are actually "Far Right"?
Mind you, that said I've always maintained that the fascists/Nazis etc were actually far left.
Rather like Labour.
Like always your wrong It's 'you're wrong
Which he 'isn't'.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 21:05:45 GMT
Far-right politics, or right-wing extremism, is a spectrum of political thought that tends to be radically conservative, ultra-nationalist, and authoritarian, often also including nativist tendencies.
------------------------------------------------------
What does far right mean?
He cited an Intelligence and Security Committee report which defines Far Right as “an umbrella term to encapsulate the entire movement which has a Far-Right political outlook in relation to matters such as culture, race, immigration and identity.” Lord Sharpe stated that the Home Office uses this definition.
------------------------------------------------------
How absurd that the excusers for riot on this forum should suggest that The Far Right, is really the far Left.
"The Far Right" ARE NOT defined by "The Left", the far right more or less has the same description of who they are, what they are in, in every reference source.
Almost always described as xenophobic, nationalist, anti-immigrant, hostile to Islam and Muslims, and up until the 1980s the far right in this country, particularly the National Front, were also very anti-semitic.
Its also beyond belief that posters would compare the ill thought out words of people like Jeremy Corbyn or Dianne Abbot to attacking the homes of Asians, attempting to firebomb Mosques and attack shops and businesses of people whom the rioters thought were Muslims / Asians or immigrants.
I watched BBC Panorama tonight on the riots, and the programme documented conclusive proof that the misinformation and falsehoods were spread and promoted by far right groups across social media, they whipped up trouble based on lies.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 21:13:57 GMT
Oh dear, some posters seem unhappy that the councillor spouting violent talk and veiled threats against the far right has not been charged yet, and not happy that so many racist thugs HAVE. I suggest you contact the Crown Prosecution Service and ask Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Aug 19, 2024 21:17:33 GMT
Oh dear, some posters seem unhappy that the councillor spouting violent talk and veiled threats against the far right has not been charged yet, and not happy that so many racist thugs HAVE. I suggest you contact the Crown Prosecution Service and ask Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. So a special trained armed officer seen red mist? |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 21:22:41 GMT
Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. So a special trained armed officer seen red mist? So a biased poster who’d already described police officers as racist scum and thugs before seeing the footage of what occured before now consolidates that bias with more of the same. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 21:45:29 GMT
Oh dear, some posters seem unhappy that the councillor spouting violent talk and veiled threats against the far right has not been charged yet, and not happy that so many racist thugs HAVE. I suggest you contact the Crown Prosecution Service and ask Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. A police officer stamped on a suspects head, he also kicked a suspect in the head whilst laid, faced down on the ground after been tasered, at the time of the ASSAULT by the police officer, another officer was stood facing the suspect with a Taser aimed at him. If you cannot see that this is a cut and dried case of unecessary assault then you need your head examining - police officers DO NOT stamp on suspects heads, or kick suspects in the head. No double standards at all, its a clear cut case of a police officer going too far - End Of. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 19, 2024 21:50:17 GMT
Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. A police officer stamped on a suspects head, he also kicked a suspect in the head whilst laid, faced down on the ground after been tasered, at the time of the ASSAULT by the police officer, another officer was stood facing the suspect with a Taser aimed at him. If you cannot see that this is a cut and dried case of unecessary assault then you need your head examining - police officers DO NOT stamp on suspects heads, or kick suspects in the head. No double standards at all, it’s a clear cut case of a police officer going too far - End Of. You’ve been told time after time that a suspect can be dangerous after being tazed. You even have been shown videos proving it. You and doofus are either thick or deliberately obtuse . Well doofus is thick but you might be either . |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 19, 2024 21:53:14 GMT
Well you’ve no need to be upset have you because you have already decided a police officers guilt as you said in another post Got inside information have you? And were posters saying that about the Asian males you’d be crying far right racists. in another post you say this So there you are making excuses for violent conduct whilst condemning a police officer and finding him guilty before any legal processes who was assaulted and saw colleagues especially the female police officer also assaulted. You couldn’t bring yourself to say as you did in that in bold above Clearly the officer was angered by the brutal assault on colleagues especially the female officer (as anyone would be.) So there we are witchfinder double standards of yours on display for all to see,I doubt you’ll reply as you seldom do when confronted by uncomfortable truths. A police officer stamped on a suspects head, he also kicked a suspect in the head whilst laid, faced down on the ground after been tasered, at the time of the ASSAULT by the police officer, another officer was stood facing the suspect with a Taser aimed at him. If you cannot see that this is a cut and dried case of unecessary assault then you need your head examining - police officers DO NOT stamp on suspects heads, or kick suspects in the head. No double standards at all, its a clear cut case of a police officer going too far - End Of. When the guy on the ground broke the policewoman's nose was that a case of 'unnecessary assault'? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 22:18:29 GMT
A police officer stamped on a suspects head, he also kicked a suspect in the head whilst laid, faced down on the ground after been tasered, at the time of the ASSAULT by the police officer, another officer was stood facing the suspect with a Taser aimed at him. If you cannot see that this is a cut and dried case of unecessary assault then you need your head examining - police officers DO NOT stamp on suspects heads, or kick suspects in the head. No double standards at all, it’s a clear cut case of a police officer going too far - End Of. You’ve been told time after time that a suspect can be dangerous after being tazed. You even have been shown videos proving it. You and doofus are either thick or deliberately obtuse . Well doofus is thick but you might be either . The suspect was floored, meaning that he was incapable of grabbing a police weapon, which is a bullshit excuse. A police officer had a Taser aimed at the suspect, if there had been any attempt to by the man to get up of the ground and reach for a police weapon, he could easily have been tasered again, or he could have been neutralised / subdued by the use of a trungeon. All that put aside - a police officer CANNOT kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is not I who is thick, it is you, you fail to understand that no police officer can kick or stamp on a persons head, it is simply not acceptable. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 19, 2024 22:35:19 GMT
You’ve been told time after time that a suspect can be dangerous after being tazed. You even have been shown videos proving it. You and doofus are either thick or deliberately obtuse . Well doofus is thick but you might be either . The suspect was floored, meaning that he was incapable of grabbing a police weapon, which is a bullshit excuse. A police officer had a Taser aimed at the suspect, if there had been any attempt to by the man to get up of the ground and reach for a police weapon, he could easily have been tasered again, or he could have been neutralised / subdued by the use of a trungeon. All that put aside - a police officer CANNOT kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is not I who is thick, it is you, you fail to understand that no police officer can kick or stamp on a persons head, it is simply not acceptable. The bullshit is all yours . The police officer did the right thing at the right thing at the right time for the right reason. This has been explained to you several times . I repeat, you are the kind of weasel that would hide behind an armed officer in an airport when there was danger and stab him in the back when it suits you. It turns my stomach. |
|
