|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 22:36:12 GMT
You’ve been told time after time that a suspect can be dangerous after being tazed. You even have been shown videos proving it. You and doofus are either thick or deliberately obtuse . Well doofus is thick but you might be either .
A police officer had a Taser aimed at the suspect, if there had been any attempt to by the man to get up of the ground and reach for a police weapon, he could easily have been tasered again, or he could have been neutralised / subdued by the use of a trungeon. All that put aside - a police officer CANNOT kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is not I who is thick, it is you, you fail to understand that no police officer can kick or stamp on a persons head, it is simply not acceptable. Are your thought processes terminally flawed,did you view the footage of two people tasered regaining their feet one then stabbing an officer in the face the other repeatedly getting up again and threatening officers before running and jumping off a bridge. If you view the comments to the latter you’ll see one from a person with the same mindset as you and TTL ,they foolishly commented racist police obviously without viewing it,the officer with the taser who tasered the black individual was black himself |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 22:43:57 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ?
The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 19, 2024 22:45:22 GMT
What Fiddler wants is an armed policeman during a violent encounter ( in an airport , that could have been a diversion for a terrorist attacking ) to make himself vulnerable to a potential attacker . Even after his bullshit that a tazered aggressive individual could never be a threat was refuted.
He’s an idiot .
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 19, 2024 22:47:34 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark. Of course he can you idiot . If that person was a real and present threat to him and the people around him . |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 23:02:56 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark. Of course he can you idiot . If that person was a real and present threat to him and the people around him . But he made absolutely no attempt what so ever to (A) get up of the floor or (B) to grab a police weapon, he was laid on the floor, he had been Tasered, he was SURROUNDED by police officers, one of which was holding a Taser aimed at the man on the floor. You are making excuses for a police officer who kicked an unarmed man in the head whilst lying faced down on the floor, you have not a leg to stand on, neither has the police officer. Your argument is just nonsense, its garbbage. I expect the police officer to be charged with assault - but I also expect the suspect to be also charged with assault against an emergency worker. I still want to know why the person who instigated all this, the man on the flight who racially abused the suspects mother has not been arrested or questioned. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 23:03:25 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark. Diversion after diversion,typing in capitals does not validate your flawed thought process,first you claim they could not get up when that was proven to be wrong you divert to The footage immediately prior shows how violent he was which you excuse by saying his mother was insulted,I have been told an armed police officer whose hands are engaged holding fire arms may then use their feet in an encounter with violent individuals. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 23:09:01 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark. Diversion after diversion,typing in capitals does not validate your flawed thought process,first you claim they could not get up when that was proven to be wrong you divert to The footage immediately prior shows how violent he was which you excuse by saying his mother was insulted,I have been told an armed police officer whose hands are engaged holding fire arms may then use their feet in an encounter with violent individuals. Yes the man had been violent, I agree, but when the police officer assaulted the suspect, the suspect had not attempted to get up off the ground, and made no attempt to grab a police weapon - so why did a police officer kick him in the head ? |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 23:17:07 GMT
Diversion after diversion,typing in capitals does not validate your flawed thought process,first you claim they could not get up when that was proven to be wrong you divert to The footage immediately prior shows how violent he was which you excuse by saying his mother was insulted,I have been told an armed police officer whose hands are engaged holding fire arms may then use their feet in an encounter with violent individuals. Yes the man had been violent, I agree, but when the police officer assaulted the suspect, the suspect had not attempted to get up off the ground, and made no attempt to grab a police weapon - so why did a police officer kick him in the head ? You are ignoring the evidence that someone tasered can be on their feet within seconds,armed officers who fear their weapons can be taken are entitled to use force necessary to ensure they retain control of them. |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 19, 2024 23:32:12 GMT
Yes the man had been violent, I agree, but when the police officer assaulted the suspect, the suspect had not attempted to get up off the ground, and made no attempt to grab a police weapon - so why did a police officer kick him in the head ? You are ignoring the evidence that someone tasered can be on their feet within seconds,armed officers who fear their weapons can be taken are entitled to use force necessary to ensure they retain control of them. What a stupid excuse - so you are now saying that because he might have / could have got back up, and he potentially might have attempted to take a weapon from a police officer ( how many police officers were there ? ), the officer did the right thing and stamped on the suspects head. ? I win the argument because the excuses are just so ridiculous |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 19, 2024 23:37:17 GMT
Far-right politics, or right-wing extremism, is a spectrum of political thought that tends to be radically conservative, ultra-nationalist, and authoritarian, often also including nativist tendencies. ------------------------------------------------------ What does far right mean? He cited an Intelligence and Security Committee report which defines Far Right as “an umbrella term to encapsulate the entire movement which has a Far-Right political outlook in relation to matters such as culture, race, immigration and identity.” Lord Sharpe stated that the Home Office uses this definition. ------------------------------------------------------ How absurd that the excusers for riot on this forum should suggest that The Far Right, is really the far Left. "The Far Right" ARE NOT defined by "The Left", the far right more or less has the same description of who they are, what they are in, in every reference source. Almost always described as xenophobic, nationalist, anti-immigrant, hostile to Islam and Muslims, and up until the 1980s the far right in this country, particularly the National Front, were also very anti-semitic. Its also beyond belief that posters would compare the ill thought out words of people like Jeremy Corbyn or Dianne Abbot to attacking the homes of Asians, attempting to firebomb Mosques and attack shops and businesses of people whom the rioters thought were Muslims / Asians or immigrants. I watched BBC Panorama tonight on the riots, and the programme documented conclusive proof that the misinformation and falsehoods were spread and promoted by far right groups across social media, they whipped up trouble based on lies. Bollocks, fiddles. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 19, 2024 23:37:38 GMT
Oh dear, some posters seem unhappy that the councillor spouting violent talk and veiled threats against the far right has not been charged yet, and not happy that so many racist thugs HAVE. I suggest you contact the Crown Prosecution Service and ask Oh but he's your kind of racist though, isn't he fiddles?
Brown racist = Good. White racist = Bad.
("Racist" According to the left wing dictionary = A white person that the left don't like).
I guess this is why he has derailed the thread. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 19, 2024 23:38:26 GMT
You’ve been told time after time that a suspect can be dangerous after being tazed. You even have been shown videos proving it. You and doofus are either thick or deliberately obtuse . Well doofus is thick but you might be either . The suspect was floored, meaning that he was incapable of grabbing a police weapon, which is a bullshit excuse. A police officer had a Taser aimed at the suspect, if there had been any attempt to by the man to get up of the ground and reach for a police weapon, he could easily have been tasered again, or he could have been neutralised / subdued by the use of a trungeon. All that put aside - a police officer CANNOT kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is not I who is thick, it is you, you fail to understand that no police officer can kick or stamp on a persons head, it is simply not acceptable. Bollocks, fiddles. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 19, 2024 23:48:31 GMT
You are ignoring the evidence that someone tasered can be on their feet within seconds,armed officers who fear their weapons can be taken are entitled to use force necessary to ensure they retain control of them. What a stupid excuse - so you are now saying that because he might have / could have got back up, and he potentially might have attempted to take a weapon from a police officer ( how many police officers were there ? ), the officer did the right thing and stamped on the suspects head. ? I win the argument because the excuses are just so ridiculous How old are you? Playground debate reliant on ignoring evidence |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 20, 2024 0:00:30 GMT
What a stupid excuse - so you are now saying that because he might have / could have got back up, and he potentially might have attempted to take a weapon from a police officer ( how many police officers were there ? ), the officer did the right thing and stamped on the suspects head. ? I win the argument because the excuses are just so ridiculous How old are you? Playground debate reliant on ignoring evidence Standard fayre for the extreme left, sadly. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 20, 2024 0:03:21 GMT
Let me repeat this for the 20th time - A police officer cannot kick a suspect in the head or stamp on a suspects head, it is unacceptable. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? The suspect did not attempt to get up, he did not attempt to grab a police weapon, its an excuse, its an excuse by a police officer who knows he over-stepped the mark. Two police officers were, in a sustained attack, violently assaulted by two Pakistani thugs who in spite of the obvious and overwhelming CCTV evidence, have still not been charged with anything, because they're Pakistanis. This is what you are defending. You are a disgrace. news.sky.com/story/new-footage-shows-moments-before-man-kicked-in-head-by-police-officer-at-manchester-airport-13186058 |
|
