|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 8, 2024 8:10:47 GMT
It's happened throughout the Occidental world, in countries geographically distant from one another: Western Europe (although Eastern Europe's beginning to catch up), the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. One could point to the fact that they're all first world economies and thus dependent upon migrant labour. However, Japan's successfully managed to limit immigration and remains a racially homogenous and materially affluent country. Besides which, all the supposed economic benefits of mass-immigration, at least for the masses, can easily be debunked and proven to be spurious. Thus we are left with conjecture, or 'conspiracy theory', as to why our countries are being transformed. What's yours? Is its motive benign, the creation of a Marxist egalitarian world state? Or is it a bid by Zionist elders who want to turn us all into serfs and rule us with an iron fist? Is it that after the Holocaust, Jews have used their influence to ensure that they'll no longer be a visible minority in the Occident, but rather be one race amongst many in racially diverse states? Is it down to the Illuminati? Or is it just big business, corporations trying to break down barriers to trade such as numerous currrencies, laws, tariffs, etc?
Recent race riots by the indigenous in England, as well as the draconian measures used to suppress them, highlight the importance of mass immigration to the managerial elite. So why is that the case?
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 8, 2024 8:44:44 GMT
Imho it is get rid of leadership competition
The societies under concerted attack hold certain historical keys and memetics (shared understanding). They would naturally wholesale reject the leadership plan being rolled out The decision to destroy them through inundation, rather than persuade, was probably made in the sixties.
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 8, 2024 8:48:45 GMT
It's happened throughout the Occidental world, in countries geographically distant from one another: Western Europe (although Eastern Europe's beginning to catch up), the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. One could point to the fact that they're all first world economies and thus dependent upon migrant labour. However, Japan's successfully managed to limit immigration and remains a racially homogenous and materially affluent country. Besides which, all the supposed economic benefits of mass-immigration, at least for the masses, can easily be debunked and proven to be spurious. Thus we are left with conjecture, or 'conspiracy theory', as to why our countries are being transformed. What's yours? Is its motive benign, the creation of a Marxist egalitarian world state? Or is it a bid by Zionist elders who want to turn us all into serfs and rule us with an iron fist? Is it that after the Holocaust, Jews have used their influence to ensure that they'll no longer be a visible minority in the Occident, but rather be one race amongst many in racially diverse states? Is it down to the Illuminati? Or is it just big business, corporations trying to break down barriers to trade such as numerous currrencies, laws, tariffs, etc?
Recent race riots by the indigenous in England, as well as the draconian measures used to suppress them, highlight the importance of mass immigration to the managerial elite. So why is that the case?
I would say immigration was always at some form of accepted and sustainable level pre 97. Post 97 is more difficult to explain and the evidence points to a deliberate policy, against democratic wishes, to water down homogeneity in societies to stop Nationalism and provide a counter in a country to National unity. That was certainly the outlook of the architects of the European project who saw war as being prevented by both control of industry and of the allowance of Nationals to reside freely throughout a controlled zone. That now seems to have morphed into a much more insidious programme, the architects of which are the true globalists who seem to control many governments through joint action unmolested by democracy in any way. As Farage says all that has happened in the General Election is the changing of middle management and the policies will continue apace.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 8, 2024 8:57:41 GMT
What happened post-1997 is that NuLabor simply turned all the flow controls to 'fully open'. All the infrastructure and channels as well as the underlying legislation necessary to facilitate mass immigration (and to suppress opposition to it) were already in place by then and had been for decades.
It's rather facile and simplistic to suggest that everything was hunky-dory prior to Blair turning up. What do you think Enoch Powell was on about, and why do you think he had to muzzled?
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Aug 8, 2024 9:12:00 GMT
Ill thought out cack handed way at filling gaps in the job market which has become ideological for Labour as it provides them with a lot of voters.
|
|
ginnyg2
Full Member
Don't blame me - I voted for someone else.
Posts: 408
|
Post by ginnyg2 on Aug 8, 2024 9:17:53 GMT
Imho it is get rid of leadership competition The societies under concerted attack hold certain historical keys and memetics (shared understanding). They would naturally wholesale reject the leadership plan being rolled out The decision to destroy them through inundation, rather than persuade, was probably made in the sixties. The purpose of mass immigration is just one facet of the Marxists' plan to destroy Western civilisation by whatever means possible.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 8, 2024 9:28:40 GMT
Imho it is get rid of leadership competition The societies under concerted attack hold certain historical keys and memetics (shared understanding). They would naturally wholesale reject the leadership plan being rolled out The decision to destroy them through inundation, rather than persuade, was probably made in the sixties. Do you think Earl Raab was talking about leadership when he wrote...
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 8, 2024 9:35:06 GMT
Imho it is get rid of leadership competition The societies under concerted attack hold certain historical keys and memetics (shared understanding). They would naturally wholesale reject the leadership plan being rolled out The decision to destroy them through inundation, rather than persuade, was probably made in the sixties. Do you think Earl Raab was talking about leadership when he wrote...
Yes. He is being rather direct about the social engineering, but this isn't really being executed to prevent the re-emergence of nazism. In fact the plan adds a significant risk that it will re-emerge, when this risk was not at all evident in society. The target is to prevent societies built on a particular understanding of authority and leadership (organic European)
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 8, 2024 9:40:26 GMT
So who do you think aspires to the leadership role in the UK that Raab signalled Jews in America will play once European-Americans became a minority in less than twenty years from now?
Muslims? Indians? Chinese? A Rainbow Coalition? Or perhaps even a quorum of local Quislings similar to those already running the show today?
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 8, 2024 9:45:35 GMT
What happened post-1997 is that NuLabor simply turned all the flow controls to 'fully open'. All the infrastructure and channels as well as the underlying legislation necessary to facilitate mass immigration (and to suppress opposition to it) were already in place by then and had been for decades. It's rather facile and simplistic to suggest that everything was hunky-dory prior to Blair turning up. What do you think Enoch Powell was on about, and why do you think he had to muzzled? Not like you to not read my post. I said in terms of acceptance immigration pre 97 was largely accepted by the bulk of British society. In the main because it did not affect them too much in any negative way. The negative aspects were largely limited to inner cities and the levels were easily coped with and easily overcome when railed against as in Smethwick and by Powell. People at the time were more concerned with what Irishmen were around and what they were planning. Powell received immense support from areas where immigration was noted to be a problem but very little in areas as yet unaffected.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 8, 2024 9:52:05 GMT
So who do you think aspires to the leadership role in the UK that Raab signalled Jews in America will play once European-Americans became a minority in less than twenty years from now? Muslims? Indians? Chinese? A Rainbow Coalition? Or perhaps even a quorum of local Quislings similar to those already running the show today? Who aspires to leadership? It will be 'a machine'. Western countries will be turned into tips and they will be 'run' by an internationally agreed process. Any attempt to deviate will be met with trade sanctions
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Aug 8, 2024 9:56:55 GMT
This is a good question. I watched a video last night, all institutions, banks governments whatever, leads back to one organisation Rockwell. Nothing happens without its say so.
Anyway, Neil Oliver on GB news discusses in a paranoid way, shadowy forces controlling all, but when it comes to it, in his videos, talks, he names no one. Having said that, even though Oliver seems paranoid, there is someone, something in charge. Our government, the USA, western europe is governed by someone higher, theres no doubt about that.
We are in the same boat as the Russian people, they think Putin is a good egg, in reality he is a demon.
The western population think our governments are ok, look at the demonstrations for the status quo last night. They were demonstrating for mass immigration, bankruptcy, corruption, low living standards in all ways, an NHS that kills.
Delusional.
Whoever it is, they have money, lots of it, they cant be exposed because it would show we are not a democracy, a democracy would not be discriminate against its own people, we must accept sexual perversion, dominance of immigrants as a superior group, look at adverts, and to oppose is to be what they are, discriminate, racially prejudiced.
If you get paid, you do as your told. I wonder if business that flogs this nonsense is fearful, if they dont conform, they will fail. There is a video about rockwell by an icelandic girl i forget her name, its on you tube.
The bottom like is that we are russia, with bmws.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2024 10:03:01 GMT
I think the purpose is encapsulated in this song. However, it is flawed, due to the tendencies to ghettoise rather than become homogenous. It is being manipulated by unelected agencies.
Take a pinch of White man
Wrap it up in Black skin
Add a touch of blue blood
And a little bitty-bit of Red Indian boy
Curly Latin kinkies
Mixed with yellow Chinkees
If you lump it all together
Well, you've got a recipe for a get-along scene
Oh what a beautiful dream
If it could only come true
You know, you know
CHORUS
What we need is a great big melting pot
Big enough to take the world and all it's got
Keep it stirring for a hundred years or more
And turn out coffee-coloured people by the score
Rabbis and the Friars
Bishops and the Gurus
You got The Beatles or the Sun God
Well it really doesn't matter what religion you choose (Blue Mink c1969)
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 8, 2024 10:04:31 GMT
Yes - the historically functioning society is being portrayed as useless and the numerous dysfunctional failed societies who can't run a bath are being treated as sacred and unquestionable
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 8, 2024 10:06:41 GMT
From a right-wing perspective immigration has always made compelling business sense because it's cheap: Either through the importation of low cost, unskilled labour or by the poaching of high cost, but already expensively trained professionals.
The left-wing view appears to be two pronged: There are those who believe that immigration is a genuinely humane thing, however misguided that may be. The other side is the left's standard divide and conquer tactics: “Diversity is our strength”. No, it's their strength because they believe that a divided society is easier to control. Although the experience of the former Eastern Bloc, not to mention our current civil unrest, demonstrates that that is not always the case.
So both right and left tend to favour immigration.
And then of course there is the age old desire of people to migrate in order to improve their lot. We've been doing that for tens of thousands of years. It's just that these days it's so much easier to do.
|
|