|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 8:19:30 GMT
What level of popularity did parties advocating the violent disorder of the rioters register at the GE? I don't think that's quite the right question. The British public have indicated in several general elections and in polling, that they want immigration reduced significantly But not that they want to see acts of violent disorder.
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Aug 4, 2024 8:22:54 GMT
Strange you didn't see the Manchester incident in the same way - in fact you blamed the police for being assaulted: So, by your token, maybe Hartlepool was a legitimate protest and the police were just being brutal, corrupt, racists? No need to answer the above question, fiddles - we all know what the answer is: You're a racist. No, the Hartlepool protests were not protests, they were simply scum egged on by right wing scum, looting shops, attacking innocent people and setting fire to peoples businesses and places of worship. Well in the timeline of all this and what seems an age ago but isn’t a thread which was “The dregs of society riot” in Harehills where a mixed bag aka dregs took exception to social services doing their job,because of that reaction police were called and the dregs thought sod any reasoning let’s riot, where you magic up the right wing scum in all this only you know. What was the reaction? social services backed down the police were ordered to withdraw and an inquest was promised. Not much longer after this some thugs at Manchester airport attacked armed officers and gave them a beating which in most other countries would have resulted in being shot dead. Half a video was shown,uproar and condemnation of thuggish police racists and scumbags which resulted in a mob gathering outside Rochdale police HQ where threats were made to riot cause mayhem and make these mother******* (the police) pay unless they got their justice.There was no riot that night because the police were ordered not to confront them or (copyright Yvette cooper) use the strongest possible action and a cop was suspended and faces criminal charges resulting in armed police laying down their weapons, We then move on to the Southport murders and by this time more dregs have witnessed what has gone on previously and think we’ll have some of that and we are where we are disorder,riots poice attacked on all sides. The reaction from you TTL and many others not least our new political masters is thugs,racists,scum the police must crack down hard. Lets be clear those involved in all the lawbreaking from Harehills to attacks on police at the airport the threats in Rochdale rioting in Southport and since were all done by the dregs of society. Now had the police been allowed to nip this in the bud the politicians and pundits not said their piece that minorities being targeted or the police were thugs and racist at the outset and allowed to do their job do you think we would be are where we are now? I suspect you and TTL will reply with more excuses and inane comments about the black and white minstrels. The reality is all those behaving as they did are the dregs and scum irrespective of colour or religion and until the law is enforced without reference to political niceties and equally without regard to ethnicity this will continue. Immigration must also be addressed because whilst people are struggling with the cost of living placing people in hotels is not sustainable,curbing immigration has been a problem for decades with promises it will be sorted by different govts who have done nothing. Blair has played a major part in all this as did his adventure with Bush that destabilised the Middle East causing the rise of isis and movement of people.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 4, 2024 8:23:45 GMT
I don't think that's quite the right question. The British public have indicated in several general elections and in polling, that they want immigration reduced significantly But not that they want to see acts of violent disorder. Correct - i'm highlight your Strawman. Nobody here said that the British public significantly support specifically violence. This could change rapidly if Keir keeps on the same course though.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 8:47:04 GMT
But not that they want to see acts of violent disorder. Correct - i'm highlight your Strawman. Nobody here said that the British public significantly support specifically violence. This could change rapidly if Keir keeps on the same course though. Were the 2011 rioters reflective of the majority of the population?
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Aug 4, 2024 8:55:28 GMT
Correct - i'm highlight your Strawman. Nobody here said that the British public significantly support specifically violence. This could change rapidly if Keir keeps on the same course though. Were the 2011 rioters reflective of the majority of the population? Your balloon has been popped. Rather than create another strawman, go and have a think.
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 9:16:00 GMT
Were the 2011 rioters reflective of the majority of the population? Your balloon has been popped. Rather than create another strawman, go and have a think. Why? Why is some riots are reflective of majority opinion and others apparently are not? And what system does one use to distinguish between the two?
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 4, 2024 9:25:17 GMT
Of course that is true but we also know that most of the country does not have the same viewpoint as the Labour party and the Labour Party seem intent on ignoring that viewpoint wholesale. Not really a good idea. We just had a general election which Labour won by a landslide. translated as the 33.7% rule the 66.3% . Sandy is of course correct in pointing out 80 % of the electorate did not vote labour, and the majority do not have the same viewpoint. Labour only "win " when the majority of the public sit at home......
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 9:28:44 GMT
We just had a general election which Labour won by a landslide. translated as the 33.7% rule the 66.3% . Sandy is of course correct in pointing out 80 % of the electorate did not vote labour, and the majority do not have the same viewpoint. Labour only "win " when the majority of the public sit at home...... That's our system, surely you respect our laws and customs? Labour got more votes than any other single party did, so their opponents were less popular.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 4, 2024 9:37:03 GMT
translated as the 33.7% rule the 66.3% . Sandy is of course correct in pointing out 80 % of the electorate did not vote labour, and the majority do not have the same viewpoint. Labour only "win " when the majority of the public sit at home...... That's our system, surely you respect our laws and customs? Labour got more votes than any other single party did, so their opponents were less popular. eh? There are numerous electoral systems in use in the uk nations , of which one is FPTP . There are different legal systems in use in the uk of which only one is English laws. We have different customs in use in the uk. Whats your point in relation to what I said? I dont support the anti democratic fptp system. Clearly , when a party only gets a minority of the vote , in this case , a third , but get rewarded with a disproportionate amount of seats , double its vote share , then we have a problem. Labour have no majority mandate. Labour didnt "win" , it fell into power off the back of a lack of proper democracy. Its landslide was a cruel mockery of what is supposed to pass for uk democracy. so if you are going to criticise Sandys views as not reflective of the majority , then it follows neither are the labour parties views reflective of the majority. 20% of the electorate ruling 80 % isnt popularity , its a farce.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 4, 2024 9:38:30 GMT
translated as the 33.7% rule the 66.3% . Sandy is of course correct in pointing out 80 % of the electorate did not vote labour, and the majority do not have the same viewpoint. Labour only "win " when the majority of the public sit at home...... Labour got more votes than any other single party did, so their opponents were less popular. so in a normal democracy , labour would have been the biggest party , with a third of seats , but no majority then?
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Aug 4, 2024 9:57:19 GMT
Powell did NOT spout a load of racist nonsense, WF. You basically fail to understand what Powell was doing. He said that it was "his duty" to represent to Parliament what his constituents were saying - that's the job of an MP. It's a pity more people don't understand the role of an MP. So far it seems that Labour MPs are basically ignoring the opinions of their constituents and do everything they can to get the muslim vote. If they carry on like this the trouble will just get worse. Powell spoke specifically about black people ( people from British overseas territories in the Caribbean ) People who were BRITISH, people who spoke English, people who were Christians and grew up largely around British culture, they were people who grew up singing "God save the Queen" ( and King ), some of them fought in our armed forces in two world wars. Powell and his supporters had a problem with a persons colour, nothing else, both he and all who support him are out and out racists.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Aug 4, 2024 10:03:22 GMT
Powell did NOT spout a load of racist nonsense, WF. You basically fail to understand what Powell was doing. He said that it was "his duty" to represent to Parliament what his constituents were saying - that's the job of an MP. It's a pity more people don't understand the role of an MP. So far it seems that Labour MPs are basically ignoring the opinions of their constituents and do everything they can to get the muslim vote. If they carry on like this the trouble will just get worse. Powell spoke specifically about black people ( people from British overseas territories in the Caribbean ) People who were BRITISH, people who spoke English, people who were Christians and grew up largely around British culture, they were people who grew up singing "God save the Queen" ( and King ), some of them fought in our armed forces in two world wars. Powell and his supporters had a problem with a persons colour, nothing else, both he and all who support him are out and out racists. bore off sid. Is this the only thing labour supporters know what to do.....scream racist and shout tory bad? Meanwhile back in the real world of the here and now , I see the Sunday post is reporting that the new labour minority support government with no mandate , cutting the winter fuel payment is going to push 270 000 pensioners into poverty and deprivation this winter , with many of them now currently living in fear at the prospect , and all you can waffle about is some long gone politician from a bygone age while screaming racist?
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 4, 2024 10:08:24 GMT
Powell did NOT spout a load of racist nonsense, WF. You basically fail to understand what Powell was doing. He said that it was "his duty" to represent to Parliament what his constituents were saying - that's the job of an MP. It's a pity more people don't understand the role of an MP. So far it seems that Labour MPs are basically ignoring the opinions of their constituents and do everything they can to get the muslim vote. If they carry on like this the trouble will just get worse. Powell spoke specifically about black people ( people from British overseas territories in the Caribbean ) People who were BRITISH, people who spoke English, people who were Christians and grew up largely around British culture, they were people who grew up singing "God save the Queen" ( and King ), some of them fought in our armed forces in two world wars. Powell and his supporters had a problem with a persons colour, nothing else, both he and all who support him are out and out racists. Actually Powell's underlying concern was the introduction into Britain of the inter-communal violence he had witnessed in India while serving there, as well as the racial strife then currently endemic in the United States. He predicted that if immigration were not curtailed and present immigrants repatriated then the same problems would arise in Britain, and who's to say he was wrong?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 10:19:24 GMT
That's our system, surely you respect our laws and customs? Labour got more votes than any other single party did, so their opponents were less popular. eh? There are numerous electoral systems in use in the uk nations , of which one is FPTP . There are different legal systems in use in the uk of which only one is English laws. We have different customs in use in the uk. Whats your point in relation to what I said? I dont support the anti democratic fptp system. Clearly , when a party only gets a minority of the vote , in this case , a third , but get rewarded with a disproportionate amount of seats , double its vote share , then we have a problem. Labour have no majority mandate. Labour didnt "win" , it fell into power off the back of a lack of proper democracy. Its landslide was a cruel mockery of what is supposed to pass for uk democracy. so if you are going to criticise Sandys views as not reflective of the majority , then it follows neither are the labour parties views reflective of the majority. 20% of the electorate ruling 80 % isnt popularity , its a farce. The right have won most of the general elections we have had under this system, was it unfair then?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 4, 2024 10:22:54 GMT
|
|