Downing Street under attack...

IIRC no one has said they are hypocrites.
What I have said is they clearly are not remotely interested in protecting children - there were children in the Asylum Hostel after all.

So once you've taken away the rather obvious lie that is claimed to be the reason behind their actions what is left?

1) A desire to use anything at all as an excuse to kick off, have a riot, do a bit of looting - in which case they are criminal scum, and need locking up ASAP.
2) A desire to use anything at all to try and justify attacks on people based on nothing more than the colour of their skin - in which case they are racist criminal scum and need locking up ASAP.

Because NO ONE in that Asylum Hostel was even remotely involved in the Southport Stabbing.
Punishing people for something they didn't do is entirely antithetical to British values - it defies the core principle of innocent until proven guilty.
Punishing a group of people because they are "guilty by association" because of something like race or religion not only defies "innocent until proven guilty" but is, de jure, a crime against humanity.

There is no way that these thugs come out of this looking like anything other than Criminal Scum, that is the very best they can hope for; next best option in Racist Criminal Scum, and after that we have Terrorist Organisation Involved In Crimes Against Humanity.

Is there anybody here who genuinely thinks that anyone who really cares about "British Cultural Values" could find that in anyway at all defensible?



All The Best

I’m am merely looking at the situation through the same simplistic, sanctimonious lens  that you used.

I can give you directions to another forum where only left-wing posters circle-jerking one another is allowed if you wish.

Here to help.

ah so once again no criticism of labour , just more empty vacuous words of mild dissapointment?



you can understand why? 

 For Englands Westminster parliament , you have a two horse race propped up by a disgraceful dodgy electoral system that awards one horse double the seats per its votes . one horse fell at the first hurdle , the jockey in a hedge , all its legs broken , and all the second horse had to do was walk to the finish line , and you tell me you understand why he was too timid?

 Labour are despised. They have no politicians of calibre. No visionaries. No polices of merit , and so far , the few things we have seen in the first month are a house building policy on a wing and a prayer , while slashing and burning old peoples winter fuel payments and keeping benefit caps.

starmers timidity means people have no faith or hope in him. Its a self defeating cycle , rinse and repeat of the same tory policies of the last 14 years which were largely despised , perhaps a fag papers width to the left  , and you wonder why people are rioting?

 Whats the response from labour? right wing , racists , and all the old tropes we are bored to death of while having not one iota of ability to deal with the issues at hand? 

I cant understand why starmer was too timid. If you do , then I can only assume you realise the uk , its parliament , and its political system are beyond saving , its problems structural and long term , and more importantly , it shows to me you have zero faith in starmer and labour , and are merely going through the motions while kidding yourself on at least they aren't the blue tories.
 

yet you seem to spend exceptional time on this forum defending labour and the status quo , while attacking right wingers ( which appears to mean anyone not on board the labour bandwagon from snp , alba , liberals , tory , reform all the way over to the bnp or other such parties and groups of the far right )

 you tell me you dont support the fptp system , while paying a bit of lip service when forced to about criticising it.

 Right ho.

 

So I said I despair of Starmer and he was too timid and you say I have no criticism of Labour.

You seem determined to attack a strawnan version of me that only exists in your head, I'll leave you to it.