|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 2, 2024 16:38:16 GMT
Well the fact that the media are being gagged as usual, you can't find links to anything that doesn't fit their agenda, the very first statement said the parents had emigrated from Rwanda 15 years ago (not illegally), then went on to say the suspect was 17, then realised that didn't fit the agenda, and changed it again, you always accuse people of making things up,, just like you make up it has been confirmed he had no 'terrorist' links ... you just made it up.
It has not yet been confirmed, that was down to andreabrown. BBC correspondent.
Wrong. I said he had no links to Islam. Catch yourself on. Who did you confirm that from? ... link please
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 2, 2024 16:39:37 GMT
Considering it's early days NO self respecting police force would confirm that already.
Having said that .... self respecting and police force .... cough cough
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 2, 2024 16:39:54 GMT
That was their first report, or a statement on their behalf, how the fuck do I know where the fuckin racist was born, or do I care, all I know some fuckin racist has murdered three innocent children and changed the lives of many more, why the fuck are we haggling where he comes from, the fact is he's a R A C I S T. Because it was you that made the allegation about what the police said. But it wasn't correct, you just made it up. I would say they were very cagey about the information released. They said he was from Wales in the first instance which seemed a very direct attempt to cloud the issue, I cannot recall how the other details came about but parents from Rwanda arrived at some point in the evening. Nothing to do with terrorism was widely touted but no answer to Farage's point if he was on a watch list as far as I am aware. It seems strange that if the motive is unknown they can say with any assurance nothing to do with terrorism. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 2, 2024 16:43:10 GMT
Because it was you that made the allegation about what the police said. But it wasn't correct, you just made it up. I would say they were very cagey about the information released. They said he was from Wales in the first instance which seemed a very direct attempt to cloud the issue, I cannot recall how the other details came about but parents from Rwanda arrived at some point in the evening. Nothing to do with terrorism was widely touted but no answer to Farage's point if he was on a watch list as far as I am aware. It seems strange that if the motive is unknown they can say with any assurance nothing to do with terrorism. How is it an attempt to cloud the issue? He does in fact come from Wales. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 2, 2024 16:47:19 GMT
Well the armchair detectives will find out exactly where and when the parents came here, the armchair detectives are far more clued up and honest and accurate than our police intelligence service ......... intelligence ... LOLOLOL
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 2, 2024 17:09:34 GMT
Wrong. I said he had no links to Islam. Catch yourself on. Who did you confirm that from? ... link please
It was on the BBC News at One. Mentioned twice. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 2, 2024 17:11:30 GMT
Because it was you that made the allegation about what the police said. But it wasn't correct, you just made it up. I would say they were very cagey about the information released. They said he was from Wales in the first instance which seemed a very direct attempt to cloud the issue, I cannot recall how the other details came about but parents from Rwanda arrived at some point in the evening. Nothing to do with terrorism was widely touted but no answer to Farage's point if he was on a watch list as far as I am aware. It seems strange that if the motive is unknown they can say with any assurance nothing to do with terrorism. I didn't say it was nothing to do with terrorism. I'm afraid FS just made that up and attributed it to me. I said that there were no links to Islam. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 2, 2024 17:11:48 GMT
Who did you confirm that from? ... link please
It was on the BBC News at One. Mentioned twice. LOL ........... so you just made it up.
according to you just like I did saying media said the family had relocated from Rwanda 15 years ago, but the suspect was born in the UK, even though he's 17...work it out sherlock.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Aug 2, 2024 17:13:22 GMT
There are already discussions in some darker corners of the interweb about the circumstances under which his parents arrived in the UK from Rwanda, and when.
According to the Mail, the father arrived in 2002 'in search of a better life', while the official narrative so far appears to have been that his parents were fleeing the genocide. That seems rather unlikely since that event took place in 1994, eight years before he was supposed to have fled.
I have read that one of the chief perpetrators of the genocide also has the surname Rudakubana, but with foremame Anaclet rather than Alphonse.
In the meantime the parents are being accommodated in a safe house somewhere else.
I'm sure it will all come out sooner rather than later, much as the PTB and the legacy media appear to want to place a cone of silence over the family background.
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 2, 2024 17:15:26 GMT
It was on the BBC News at One. Mentioned twice. LOL ........... so you just made it up.
according to you just like I did saying media said the family had relocated from Rwanda 15 years ago, but the suspect was born in the UK, even though he's 17...work it out sherlock.
The BBC only keeps one day for News programmes, so I can't provide a link. That doesn’t mean I made it up. Is that really your level of debate? I'll accept your apology over the terrorism thing. 🙃 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 2, 2024 17:18:12 GMT
LOL ........... so you just made it up.
according to you just like I did saying media said the family had relocated from Rwanda 15 years ago, but the suspect was born in the UK, even though he's 17...work it out sherlock.
The BBC only keeps one day for News programmes, so I can't provide a link. That doesn’t mean I made it up. Is that really your level of debate? I'll accept your apology over the terrorism thing. 🙃 Yeah ok then, I heard it on the BBC news programmes .... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 2, 2024 17:35:35 GMT
Well the armchair detectives will find out exactly where and when the parents came here, the armchair detectives are far more clued up and honest and accurate than our police intelligence service ......... intelligence ... LOLOLOL What, the armchair detectives that got it all so wrong the a Judge was forced to take the extraordinary measure of identifying a minor - just to protect the innocents who were put at significant risk by those armchair warriors whose spend more jerking off into their "wank socks" than they do checking FACTS? Yeah, only a moron would trust them. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Aug 2, 2024 17:38:14 GMT
Well the armchair detectives will find out exactly where and when the parents came here, the armchair detectives are far more clued up and honest and accurate than our police intelligence service ......... intelligence ... LOLOLOL What, the armchair detectives that got it all so wrong the a Judge was forced to take the extraordinary measure of identifying a minor - just to protect the innocents who put at significant risk by those armchair warriors whose spend more jerking off into the "wank socks" than they do checking FACTS? Yeah, only a moron would trust them. All The Best The name was on the internet long before the Judge formally identified the guy - I saw it over 24 hours earlier. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Aug 2, 2024 17:43:01 GMT
What, the armchair detectives that got it all so wrong the a Judge was forced to take the extraordinary measure of identifying a minor - just to protect the innocents who put at significant risk by those armchair warriors whose spend more jerking off into the "wank socks" than they do checking FACTS? Yeah, only a moron would trust them. All The Best The name was on the internet long before the Judge formally identified the guy - I saw it over 24 hours earlier. Yup. But there were other names bandied about before the correct one was made public. Those were the people the Judge was forced to act to protect. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 2, 2024 19:25:31 GMT
I would say they were very cagey about the information released. They said he was from Wales in the first instance which seemed a very direct attempt to cloud the issue, I cannot recall how the other details came about but parents from Rwanda arrived at some point in the evening. Nothing to do with terrorism was widely touted but no answer to Farage's point if he was on a watch list as far as I am aware. It seems strange that if the motive is unknown they can say with any assurance nothing to do with terrorism. How is it an attempt to cloud the issue? He does in fact come from Wales. All The Best You have no imagination. Calling someone as coming from Wales for most people would indicate what they looked like. The police knew that. |
|
