|
|
Post by borgr0 on Oct 30, 2024 0:31:00 GMT
So no 'Brave hearts there?'. I suspect that the main underlying problem was the need to avoid extremists Muslims adding to the likes of the bomb explosions on London busses in 2005. To this end the government did not want the media to feed into any possibility of continued Muslim terrorism in the UK. There is no way to control Muslim terrorism, not even all out war. Because Muslim terrorism is based upon learnt emotional indoctrination, not on commonsense or logical thought. Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party .... I won't condemn anyone and will apologise for everyone, including all those you mentioned and far more - yes everyone, without any exceptions so I would win in those stakes hands down and I am far worse than all that you mentioned anyway Ctoo means well and has long campaigned against Muslim extremism as he sees it Tommy Robinson is a patriot who is sadly being detained for speaking truth to power, I hope he is realised and fear he may die in prison. The govt have good intention and are trying their best to crack down on harmful misinfo and prevent what they see as instability to the political order, but suppression of freedom of speech must be avoided As regards the ANC, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter for example - and Tommy is exactly like that to me - a freedom fighter |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 30, 2024 8:39:33 GMT
Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party .... Behave yourself John. Lets have a grown up debate if debate is what you want. Well maybe the issue should be debated I'd always assumed Blair's government directives to the forces of law and order to ignore islamic rape of children were driven by the huge Moslem vote in constituencies such as the Home Secretary's But it's nice to see you share my view. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 30, 2024 8:57:58 GMT
Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party .... I won't condemn anyone and will apologise for everyone, including all those you mentioned and far more - yes everyone, without any exceptions so I would win in those stakes hands down and I am far worse than all that you mentioned anyway Ctoo means well and has long campaigned against Muslim extremism as he sees it Tommy Robinson is a patriot who is sadly being detained for speaking truth to power, I hope he is realised and fear he may die in prison. The govt have good intention and are trying their best to crack down on harmful misinfo and prevent what they see as instability to the political order, but suppression of freedom of speech must be avoided As regards the ANC, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter for example - and Tommy is exactly like that to me - a freedom fighter Yaxley-Lennon is at best a misguided idiot and at worst well I don't want to go there His idiocy was well demonstrated with his attempt to publicise a court hearing placed under restriction by the judge lest it jeopardise another trial I saw the actual document restricting publication It was categoric. All those present at the trial who witnessed the public sentencing of persons A, B and C etc for sexual abuse of minors were banned from making public those facts UNTIL a second trial of persons A, X, Y and Z for identical offences carried out at another date against a different victim had concluded. The reporting restriction document stated explicitly that upon the conclusion of trial two, regardless of the verdict, all persons present at trial one would then be free to report and discuss that trial openly The purpose of the restriction is obvious to any intelligent individual. Trial Two needed to be held with those persons accused being tried against evidence gathered regarding those events and that occasion. To have the result of trial one in the public domain would jeopardise both person A's right to a fair trial but ALSO cause the jury to ponder guilt of persons X Y and Z not on the basis of evidence but upon the basis of association with A Yaxley-Lennon chose to rant that this was censorship by the judiciary wishing to conceal wrongdoing by an Asian islamic, when the truth, had it been available for all to see, was nothing of the sort. I agree that past acts of government in turning a blind eye to sexual abuse of children by Asian Islamics leaves us with good reason to mistrust the lying government scum but that doesn't excuse contempt of court. What might be useful is a set of laws allowing those who do abuse such restrictions to be hung from a lamp post as a sign of how seriously such abuses might be. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 30, 2024 10:46:40 GMT
I won't condemn anyone and will apologise for everyone, including all those you mentioned and far more - yes everyone, without any exceptions so I would win in those stakes hands down and I am far worse than all that you mentioned anyway Ctoo means well and has long campaigned against Muslim extremism as he sees it Tommy Robinson is a patriot who is sadly being detained for speaking truth to power, I hope he is realised and fear he may die in prison. The govt have good intention and are trying their best to crack down on harmful misinfo and prevent what they see as instability to the political order, but suppression of freedom of speech must be avoided As regards the ANC, one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter for example - and Tommy is exactly like that to me - a freedom fighter Yaxley-Lennon is at best a misguided idiot and at worst well I don't want to go there His idiocy was well demonstrated with his attempt to publicise a court hearing placed under restriction by the judge lest it jeopardise another trial I saw the actual document restricting publication It was categoric. All those present at the trial who witnessed the public sentencing of persons A, B and C etc for sexual abuse of minors were banned from making public those facts UNTIL a second trial of persons A, X, Y and Z for identical offences carried out at another date against a different victim had concluded. The reporting restriction document stated explicitly that upon the conclusion of trial two, regardless of the verdict, all persons present at trial one would then be free to report and discuss that trial openly The purpose of the restriction is obvious to any intelligent individual. Trial Two needed to be held with those persons accused being tried against evidence gathered regarding those events and that occasion. To have the result of trial one in the public domain would jeopardise both person A's right to a fair trial but ALSO cause the jury to ponder guilt of persons X Y and Z not on the basis of evidence but upon the basis of association with A Yaxley-Lennon chose to rant that this was censorship by the judiciary wishing to conceal wrongdoing by an Asian islamic, when the truth, had it been available for all to see, was nothing of the sort. I agree that past acts of government in turning a blind eye to sexual abuse of children by Asian Islamics leaves us with good reason to mistrust the lying government scum but that doesn't excuse contempt of court. What might be useful is a set of laws allowing those who do abuse such restrictions to be hung from a lamp post as a sign of how seriously such abuses might be. Totally agree. I can't understand why people on this thread are referring to Tommy Bobbins as clever. It beggars belief. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 30, 2024 10:50:18 GMT
Yaxley-Lennon is at best a misguided idiot and at worst well I don't want to go there His idiocy was well demonstrated with his attempt to publicise a court hearing placed under restriction by the judge lest it jeopardise another trial I saw the actual document restricting publication It was categoric. All those present at the trial who witnessed the public sentencing of persons A, B and C etc for sexual abuse of minors were banned from making public those facts UNTIL a second trial of persons A, X, Y and Z for identical offences carried out at another date against a different victim had concluded. The reporting restriction document stated explicitly that upon the conclusion of trial two, regardless of the verdict, all persons present at trial one would then be free to report and discuss that trial openly The purpose of the restriction is obvious to any intelligent individual. Trial Two needed to be held with those persons accused being tried against evidence gathered regarding those events and that occasion. To have the result of trial one in the public domain would jeopardise both person A's right to a fair trial but ALSO cause the jury to ponder guilt of persons X Y and Z not on the basis of evidence but upon the basis of association with A Yaxley-Lennon chose to rant that this was censorship by the judiciary wishing to conceal wrongdoing by an Asian islamic, when the truth, had it been available for all to see, was nothing of the sort. I agree that past acts of government in turning a blind eye to sexual abuse of children by Asian Islamics leaves us with good reason to mistrust the lying government scum but that doesn't excuse contempt of court. What might be useful is a set of laws allowing those who do abuse such restrictions to be hung from a lamp post as a sign of how seriously such abuses might be. Totally agree. I can't understand why people on this thread are referring to Tommy Bobbins as clever. It beggars belief. He must be clever he's more popular than Starmer. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Oct 30, 2024 10:52:38 GMT
Totally agree. I can't understand why people on this thread are referring to Tommy Bobbins as clever. It beggars belief. He must be clever he's more popular than Starmer. You equate intelligence to popularity? 🤔😲😳 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 30, 2024 10:58:31 GMT
He must be clever he's more popular than Starmer. You equate intelligence to popularity? 🤔😲😳 Starmer has either. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 30, 2024 11:02:54 GMT
What does Tommy Robinson stand for ? What is he claiming?
The circus around Robinson seems to be taking over from his opinions .
I understand that he says multiculturalism doesn’t work and Islam is a toxic culture.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 30, 2024 11:08:57 GMT
It's like the idiots who were marching because they wanted to rejoin the EU.
When they were asked what it was they missed about being in the EU, the interviewer was met with a deafening silence, eventually after a long long thought, some old dear said ... I can't buy my German table cloths.
You will get the exact reaction if you stopped marchers protesting about Tommy Robinson, they wont have a clue other than the lefty narrative 'he's a far right racist' ... unable to back up one of those claims with fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 30, 2024 11:09:26 GMT
He must be clever he's more popular than Starmer. You equate intelligence to popularity? 🤔😲😳 Your hero starmer is so fucking thick andrea he can't even define a woman FFS... |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 30, 2024 11:11:26 GMT
Totally agree. I can't understand why people on this thread are referring to Tommy Bobbins as clever. It beggars belief. He must be clever he's more popular than Starmer. Although to be fair that twat Corbyn was more popular than Starmer!🤣 |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 30, 2024 11:18:38 GMT
Behave yourself John. Lets have a grown up debate if debate is what you want. Well maybe the issue should be debated I'd always assumed Blair's government directives to the forces of law and order to ignore islamic rape of children were driven by the huge Moslem vote in constituencies such as the Home Secretary's But it's nice to see you share my view. To my knowledge there never was any government directives "to the forces of law and order to ignore islamic rape of children" the only information I recall was for the Police not to make the situation a racist problem. It was after all a failure by Local Council Authorities, not just the police. Police enquiries began around 2008/09 leading to gang arrests in 2010, there was no rule/law that stopped the police from making arrests earlier, the early problem appears to be that so many people, including the young victims, kept the whole issue a secrete. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 30, 2024 11:24:56 GMT
You equate intelligence to popularity? 🤔😲😳 Your hero starmer is so fucking thick andrea he can't even define a woman FFS... In your context, neither can you. What do you know about multiple mixes of sex determining chromosomes and hormones? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 30, 2024 11:29:13 GMT
Your hero starmer is so fucking thick andrea he can't even define a woman FFS... In your context, neither can you. What do you know about multiple mixes of sex determining chromosomes and hormones? A fucking site more than starmer or you..... |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 30, 2024 11:32:20 GMT
Your hero starmer is so fucking thick andrea he can't even define a woman FFS... In your context, neither can you. What do you know about multiple mixes of sex determining chromosomes and hormones? Same old leftie obfuscation crap. No one suggests that there are no sexual anomalies. What is questioned is a biological male ‘ identifying as a female and having the right to be redefined as such . If there is a biological anomaly then it should be defined as such . |
|
