|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 29, 2024 15:37:38 GMT
Yes, the estabishment tolerate these vile grooming gangs and won't tolerate those who do not. This is why the establishment wankers are currently jacking off to the corrupt courts.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 29, 2024 15:42:49 GMT
Tommy Robinson is one end of a spectrum of hate - at the opposite end are Islamic extremists But MOST white, British people do not support Tommy Robinson, and MOST British Muslims do not support Islamic extremists. This is not a binary issue, there is no "one side or the other", in my book if you do not accept British values, those of Tolerance, Freedom of Religion, Democracy, Equality and Free Speech within the parameters of incitement of hatred or civil unrest .... then piss off and live in Russia or Iran. UNFORTUNATELY **MOST** members of parliament DO support Islamics who have a rather culturally defined view of the role of females. And everything else follows from there That's doubelthink, and it is why George Orwell was such a genius to so accurately predict how things were going to turn out in 1948. The thing was, he was one of them, so he knew it all from the inside.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Oct 29, 2024 15:52:40 GMT
Shock, horror! White people that are proud to be British ! racist scum need to be locked up I would take a bet that the amount of purposeful damage they have created in British society, they would find those lot as beyond the pale. How can there be anyone left unless they were racist brainless morons. I get the feeling one or two in the Westminster party have even said so.
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 29, 2024 15:53:47 GMT
UNFORTUNATELY **MOST** members of parliament DO support Islamics who have a rather culturally defined view of the role of females. And everything else follows from there That's doubelthink, and it is why George Orwell was such a genius to so accurately predict how things were going to turn out in 1948. The thing was, he was one of them, so he knew it all from the inside. Actually, Orwell was from elitist stock and was a very posh bloke. His father worked for the Empire in India. Orwell eventually chose not to follow in his father's footsteps and they fell out. After roaming the world he ended up supporting workers movements and writing for them, but stood out like a sore thumb because of his posh background. He used to try and put on a working class accent to try and fit in. Those who knew him would joke that he fell down in the world. Sure, he supported the old-school socialists in England but it was a lot different back then. He hated Stalinism and would have detested the Labour party today. He barely lived long enough to bring us 1984 and died at the age of 46 from a lung condition that he was born with.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 29, 2024 15:58:18 GMT
Yes. I believe that he was an old Etonian.
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 29, 2024 16:03:40 GMT
Yes. I believe that he was an old Etonian. From what I know he wasn't doing too well at Eton and became depressed. It wasn't due to a lack of intelligence on his part, I just don't think he liked the role he was being pushed into.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 29, 2024 17:46:23 GMT
UNFORTUNATELY **MOST** members of parliament DO support Islamics who have a rather culturally defined view of the role of females. And everything else follows from there That's doubelthink, and it is why George Orwell was such a genius to so accurately predict how things were going to turn out in 1948. The thing was, he was one of them, so he knew it all from the inside. Ok well YOU tell me why nobody did a thing about Pakistani islamic child abusers .... The only possible reason is that most of the inhabitants of SW1A 1AA were happy to turn a blind eye, or actively prevent police action
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 29, 2024 17:49:47 GMT
That's doubelthink, and it is why George Orwell was such a genius to so accurately predict how things were going to turn out in 1948. The thing was, he was one of them, so he knew it all from the inside. Actually, Orwell was from elitist stock and was a very posh bloke. His father worked for the Empire in India. Orwell eventually chose not to follow in his father's footsteps and they fell out. After roaming the world he ended up supporting workers movements and writing for them, but stood out like a sore thumb because of his posh background. He used to try and put on a working class accent to try and fit in. Those who knew him would joke that he fell down in the world. Sure, he supported the old-school socialists in England but it was a lot different back then. He hated Stalinism and would have detested the Labour party today. He barely lived long enough to bring us 1984 and died at the age of 46 from a lung condition that he was born with. Indeed he did see the way that Stalin corrupted the socialist ideal and he wasn't the only one. His somewhat autobiographical work A Homage To Catalonia is a masterclass on socialist fuckaboutery. I highly recommend it
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 29, 2024 18:12:03 GMT
The Pakistani Grooming Gangs were brought to attention in the House of Commons by a local MP, how the local Police, Child Welfare Officers and similar Officials in local Government did and said nothing total lack of Care, because they feared being branded Racists So no 'Brave hearts there?'. I suspect that the main underlying problem was the need to avoid extremists Muslims adding to the likes of the bomb explosions on London busses in 2005. To this end the government did not want the media to feed into any possibility of continued Muslim terrorism in the UK. There is no way to control Muslim terrorism, not even all out war. Because Muslim terrorism is based upon learnt emotional indoctrination, not on commonsense or logical thought.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 29, 2024 19:16:26 GMT
That's doubelthink, and it is why George Orwell was such a genius to so accurately predict how things were going to turn out in 1948. The thing was, he was one of them, so he knew it all from the inside. Ok well YOU tell me why nobody did a thing about Pakistani islamic child abusers .... The only possible reason is that most of the inhabitants of SW1A 1AA were happy to turn a blind eye, or actively prevent police action I meant that's doublethink from SW1A 1AA.
We passionately believe in Gay Rights and want to get every policeman to celebrate pride and look gay. We passionately believe in Islam and want to get every church, council, you name it to celebrate Eid and look Brown.
You see how that is doublethink, given the definition of doublethink provided in 1984.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 29, 2024 21:20:59 GMT
Shock, horror! White people that are proud to be British ! racist scum need to be locked up Nothing new about extremists hiding behind the Flag, or sometimes in front of the Flag.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 29, 2024 22:27:53 GMT
Ok well YOU tell me why nobody did a thing about Pakistani islamic child abusers .... The only possible reason is that most of the inhabitants of SW1A 1AA were happy to turn a blind eye, or actively prevent police action I meant that's doublethink from SW1A 1AA.
We passionately believe in Gay Rights and want to get every policeman to celebrate pride and look gay. We passionately believe in Islam and want to get every church, council, you name it to celebrate Eid and look Brown. Ah. Yes.
You see how that is doublethink, given the definition of doublethink provided in 1984.
Ah. yes, I see. Yes, I agree
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Oct 29, 2024 22:30:57 GMT
The Pakistani Grooming Gangs were brought to attention in the House of Commons by a local MP, how the local Police, Child Welfare Officers and similar Officials in local Government did and said nothing total lack of Care, because they feared being branded Racists So no 'Brave hearts there?'. I suspect that the main underlying problem was the need to avoid extremists Muslims adding to the likes of the bomb explosions on London busses in 2005. To this end the government did not want the media to feed into any possibility of continued Muslim terrorism in the UK. There is no way to control Muslim terrorism, not even all out war. Because Muslim terrorism is based upon learnt emotional indoctrination, not on commonsense or logical thought. Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party ....
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Oct 29, 2024 23:11:11 GMT
So no 'Brave hearts there?'. I suspect that the main underlying problem was the need to avoid extremists Muslims adding to the likes of the bomb explosions on London busses in 2005. To this end the government did not want the media to feed into any possibility of continued Muslim terrorism in the UK. There is no way to control Muslim terrorism, not even all out war. Because Muslim terrorism is based upon learnt emotional indoctrination, not on commonsense or logical thought. Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party .... Behave yourself John. Lets have a grown up debate if debate is what you want.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 29, 2024 23:18:22 GMT
Well, that's a new one. Ignore children being fucked by Moslems because they'll bomb our buses if we don't. You really have hit a new low in the grovelling snivelling apologist stakes here. Fuck me, that's almost as good as Peter Hain the apologist and eulogiser for the ANC bombers. Mind you, he was a lefty too, after he ditched the liberal party .... Behave yourself John. Let’s have a grown up debate if debate is what you want. Says the leftie who slags off anyone who isn’t a leftie.
|
|