Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 21:53:51 GMT
This is highly disingenuous of you. I have never said that you regard the comment as acceptable. I have said that others around here seem to have no problem with it. What I have said is that in your responses to me you have not yourself expressed any condemnation for such racist language or those who seek to defend it, instead trying to change the subject with whataboutery. If I want to talk about the Labour candidate for Clacton, some twat who said something stupid in some other party or whatever it might be I would join a thread about it or start one of my own....the subject matter here is the acceptability or otherwise of calling someone an "effing P*ki". Until that is addressed by you I will not be discussing your other preferred topics here. When you do address it we can maybe have a sensible discussion that takes full account of those other related issues and persons. Not today though. I honestly thought you were a more honest debater than this, and since I feel rather irritated at your transparent obfuscations I will say goodnight to you and maybe return tomorrow. Right now I feel a yearning to be off to relax. Enjoy your evening. Honest?really did you even bother to look at the link I posted to TTL he’s another who looks and decides on someone’s thoughts,who do you think you are I've never expected you to justify your stance which is what you’re doing now. Why in gods name we have courts and a jury who knows when people like you can decide on something somebody didn’t say. You said you knew me obviously not,I have been honest with both you and TTL and in fact gone out of my way to be polite and not name call him and patiently replied because I was led to believe he’d suffered some sort of illness. I have not read the entirety of yours or anyone else's responses to everyone else. Just your responses to me is what we are discussing and mine to you. I never accused you of siding with the knuckle draggers, you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of and of saying things I didnt actually say. But it is not unreasonable in a thread devoted to someone being called an effing P*ki to ask what you think of that instead of the constant whataboutery in an obvious attempt to deflect the flak elsewhere. I am not accusing you of being a racist, but yet you do seem to have blind spots where racists are concerned sometimes. This entire thread looks like a broadcast for the hate not hope party as I saw someone else somewhere say. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 29, 2024 21:58:10 GMT
Honest?really did you even bother to look at the link I posted to TTL he’s another who looks and decides on someone’s thoughts,who do you think you are I've never expected you to justify your stance which is what you’re doing now. Why in gods name we have courts and a jury who knows when people like you can decide on something somebody didn’t say. You said you knew me obviously not,I have been honest with both you and TTL and in fact gone out of my way to be polite and not name call him and patiently replied because I was led to believe he’d suffered some sort of illness. I have not read the entirety of yours or anyone else's responses to everyone else. Just your responses to me is what we are discussing and mine to you. I never accused you of siding with the knuckle draggers, you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of and of saying things I didnt actually say. But it is not unreasonable in a thread devoted to someone being called an effing P*ki to ask what you think of that instead of the constant whataboutery in an obvious attempt to deflect the flak elsewhere. I am not accusing you of being a racist, but yet you do seem to have blind spots where racists are concerned sometimes. This entire thread looks like a broadcast for the hate not hope party as I saw someone else somewhere say. No one gives a fuck, Shrieks.
BTW, Jonksy is owning you on the Snowflake Forum.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 21:59:22 GMT
I doubt he actually quaffs “WHITE MANS TEARS” (sic), but I have to admit that I occasionally get a nice warm feeling when some voluble racist bigot gets shown up in the media — and doubly so if they’re shown to be an ill-informed (OK, poorly educated) oaf. I don’t think that makes me a White-hating (insert whatever noun you have in your vocabulary), Christ, I actually married a Whitie, and have not regretted one single minute — not even when (shush, Mrs reads this)… I think that you are making excuses for a black racist . If a white reform candidate said that he drank’ black man’s tears ‘ and was standing for the white people in his constituency, you would cry racism and you know it . Well yes, this black guy is being a racist. But where yours shines through is that you only recognise racism if it is directed at white people. If it is white people directing it at anybody else you can barely hide your own moral support for it. As such you are one of a number of obvious racist scumbags polluting this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 21:59:28 GMT
Lefties are whine about an obvious C4 plant and excusing an obviously racist Labour candidate.
Then they cry whataboutery and questioning other posters honesty .
It’s mind boggling hypocrisy, yet not unexpected.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 22:00:07 GMT
I have not read the entirety of yours or anyone else's responses to everyone else. Just your responses to me is what we are discussing and mine to you. I never accused you of siding with the knuckle draggers, you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of and of saying things I didnt actually say. But it is not unreasonable in a thread devoted to someone being called an effing P*ki to ask what you think of that instead of the constant whataboutery in an obvious attempt to deflect the flak elsewhere. I am not accusing you of being a racist, but yet you do seem to have blind spots where racists are concerned sometimes. This entire thread looks like a broadcast for the hate not hope party as I saw someone else somewhere say. No one gives a fuck, Shrieks.
BTW, Jonksy is owning you on the Snowflake Forum. Jonky isn't capable of owning his own farts, lol |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 29, 2024 22:05:18 GMT
No one gives a fuck, Shrieks.
BTW, Jonksy is owning you on the Snowflake Forum. Jonky isn't capable of owning his own farts, lol Meanwhile you're in a forum where you sniff each others. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 22:05:20 GMT
I think that you are making excuses for a black racist . If a white reform candidate said that he drank’ black man’s tears ‘ and was standing for the white people in his constituency, you would cry racism and you know it . Well yes, this black guy is being a racist. But where yours shines through is that you only recognise racism if it is directed at white people. If it is white people directing it at anybody else you can barely hide your own moral support for it. As such you are one of a number of obvious racist scumbags polluting this forum. Absolute bullshit . I recognise racism towards black people but I’m not stupid enough not to recognise a set up . The guy in the video was definitely spouting racist remarks . Its dishonest lefties like you that insist that the guy was a bona fide Reform supporter and dismiss the evidence that he was a plant . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 22:06:45 GMT
Jonky isn't capable of owning his own farts, lol Meanwhile you're in a forum where you sniff each others. They are all old farts anyway . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 29, 2024 22:07:37 GMT
Meanwhile you're in a forum where you sniff each others. They are all old farts anyway . And exceptionally stale ones at that. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 22:10:52 GMT
They are all old farts anyway . And exceptionally stale ones at that. lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 29, 2024 22:12:12 GMT
Mod Notice
Tone down the personal abuse please
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jun 29, 2024 22:40:46 GMT
So Farage lashes out at not one, but two of our national broadcasters now He insists that Andrew Parker, the man who made various toxic and racist remarks was a plant, planted as an actor by Channel 4 to smear Reform UK, yet he has presented no evidence for such a claim, and Despatches have issued a statement rigorously denying the claim. Next comes Farage's other baseless claim, again with no evidence, that the BBC's flagship "Question Time" on which he appeared on Friday had a "rigged audience". Farage has now spit his dummy out and made an official complaint about Channel 4 to OFCOM, he's also refused to appear on various BBC News and Current Affairs programmes. He's not playing any more Meanwhile a poll conducted by "Britain Elects" asking the question [Which channel will you be watching the election coverage on election night] has found that the BBC is the clear favourite once again, with SKY, ITV and GB News trailing far behind, with 20,000 votes so far. Hardly baseless. A random audience would be filled with about 20% Reform supporters who would tend to clap the man they see as leader of Reform, the questions were all deigned to highlight what the BBC see as Reform's weak point and did not cover much other ground as regards policies. The 'impartial chairwoman' was primed with 'fact check' information to refute Reform's figures. The 'impartial chairwoman' was aggressive and interruptive when supplying 'detail' and asking more questions than the audience put together. As regards the Andrew Parker saga the facts are clear unless you know different. The first day of this man on the job he was attached to the Channel 4 team who seemingly had that first day on the job as well. After the incident was reported he was asked if he was an actor, he denied it, he then said he was an actor. He had spent all day talking in his 'acting' voice when his normal voice is different both in tone and accent, why would one do that unless some deception was intended? Channel 4 went undercover and scored a 'scoop' within a few hours with a first time canvasser. Covering the election results should be an expertise of the BBC as they have been doing it many years before the others got off the ground. There is also little scope to affect results with bias. Wrong - BBC Question Time audiences are not based on current opinion polling, they are based on how people voted at the last general election. In 2019 there was no Reform UK, so I am guessing that Question Time PROBABLY bases audience participation on The Brexit Party, which would mean that 2% of the audience might be Reform Uk voters. As regards the Channel 4 investigation, I find it utterly remarkable that none of the right wing press seem to be covering the story with the premise that Andrew Parker was a plant, including the rabid right wing Daily Mail, the Daily Express or even GB News which merely parrots what Farage has said. Meanwhile Channel 4 have stated this : "We met Parker for the first time at Reform UK party headquarters, where he was a Reform party canvasser,” “We did not pay the Reform UK canvasser or anyone else in this report. Parker was not known to Channel 4 News and was filmed covertly via the undercover operation.” |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 22:49:11 GMT
Hardly baseless. A random audience would be filled with about 20% Reform supporters who would tend to clap the man they see as leader of Reform, the questions were all deigned to highlight what the BBC see as Reform's weak point and did not cover much other ground as regards policies. The 'impartial chairwoman' was primed with 'fact check' information to refute Reform's figures. The 'impartial chairwoman' was aggressive and interruptive when supplying 'detail' and asking more questions than the audience put together. As regards the Andrew Parker saga the facts are clear unless you know different. The first day of this man on the job he was attached to the Channel 4 team who seemingly had that first day on the job as well. After the incident was reported he was asked if he was an actor, he denied it, he then said he was an actor. He had spent all day talking in his 'acting' voice when his normal voice is different both in tone and accent, why would one do that unless some deception was intended? Channel 4 went undercover and scored a 'scoop' within a few hours with a first time canvasser. Covering the election results should be an expertise of the BBC as they have been doing it many years before the others got off the ground. There is also little scope to affect results with bias. Wrong - BBC Question Time audiences are not based on current opinion polling, they are based on how people voted at the last general election. In 2019 there was no Reform UK, so I am guessing that Question Time PROBABLY bases audience participation on The Brexit Party, which would mean that 2% of the audience might be Reform Uk voters. As regards the Channel 4 investigation, I find it utterly remarkable that none of the right wing press seem to be covering the story with the premise that Andrew Parker was a plant, including the rabid right wing Daily Mail, the Daily Express or even GB News which merely parrots what Farage has said. Meanwhile Channel 4 have stated this : "We met Parker for the first time at Reform UK party headquarters, where he was a Reform party canvasser,” “We did not pay the Reform UK canvasser or anyone else in this report. Parker was not known to Channel 4 News and was filmed covertly via the undercover operation.” The whole thing stinks .An actor talking in his ‘ acting ‘ voice and being ( by coincidence) recorded by a C4 journalist spouting racist rhetoric. Pull the other one . |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jun 29, 2024 23:08:37 GMT
Yes, because they're Irish. Sunak is British, he was born in Tooting, so he's not a foreigner. If Sunak had been born in Ireland then he would be a foreigner. You cannot be this dumb. Rishi Sunak was born in Southampton miles away from Tooting Was he born before 1971 ? I think not In 1970 it was sufficient for the purpose of being British for you mother to drop you on British, British Colonial or British Overseas Dependent Territorial soil With the passing of Ted Heath's 1971 immigration act that was no longer sufficient. So, when he was born, what nationality were his mother, father, grandmother(s) and grandfather(s) I don't actually care much what the answer is. I just need to point out the failure to fully assess the reality |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 30, 2024 4:38:05 GMT
Jonky isn't capable of owning his own farts, lol Meanwhile you're in a forum where you sniff each others. Just more denigration ^ which you seem to prefer to debate |
|
