|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 17:50:42 GMT
Jeez. Racism is ok when it suits you ! Ffs, Thus merely explodes your rank hypocrisy. Whataboutery has nothing to do with it . His Favourite drink is “WHITE MANS TEARS “ you are just as racist as him . Thank you for pointing that out . I am a white man you know. Thought I should point that out in a desperate attempt to prevent you from making yourself look even more stupid. Nope. You can be a self hating white man who defends a black racist . In fact you are and just have . I agree that you are desperate though . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 17:55:44 GMT
That’s marvellous but you like TTL are making assumptions,is it to suit your narrative? please find a single post where I’ve said it is ok to call Sunak an effing Pak* If you don’t which I am 100% sure you won’t I expect you like TTL will not retract what you’ve said. This is highly disingenuous of you. I have never said that you regard the comment as acceptable. I have said that others around here seem to have no problem with it. What I have said is that in your responses to me you have not yourself expressed any condemnation for such racist language or those who seek to defend it, instead trying to change the subject with whataboutery. If I want to talk about the Labour candidate for Clacton, some twat who said something stupid in some other party or whatever it might be I would join a thread about it or start one of my own....the subject matter here is the acceptability or otherwise of calling someone an "effing P*ki". Until that is addressed by you I will not be discussing your other preferred topics here. When you do address it we can maybe have a sensible discussion that takes full account of those other related issues and persons. Not today though. I honestly thought you were a more honest debater than this, and since I feel rather irritated at your transparent obfuscations I will say goodnight to you and maybe return tomorrow. Right now I feel a yearning to be off to relax. Enjoy your evening. You “ you have not yourself expressed any condemnation for such racist language“ Also you “The man's an idiot.( the black man who says he drinks “WHITE MANS TEARS ”) But in his own way he is standing up for minorities who so often tend to be discriminated against.” That’s not only stupid but stupidly hypocritical. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 29, 2024 17:56:53 GMT
But you'd call a white Irish person living in the UK foreigners ... I get yeah. Yes, because they're Irish. Sunak is British, he was born in Tooting, so he's not a foreigner. If Sunak had been born in Ireland then he would be a foreigner. You cannot be this dumb. Rishi Sunak was born in Southampton miles away from Tooting |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jun 29, 2024 17:58:37 GMT
So Farage lashes out at not one, but two of our national broadcasters now
He insists that Andrew Parker, the man who made various toxic and racist remarks was a plant, planted as an actor by Channel 4 to smear Reform UK, yet he has presented no evidence for such a claim, and Despatches have issued a statement rigorously denying the claim.
Next comes Farage's other baseless claim, again with no evidence, that the BBC's flagship "Question Time" on which he appeared on Friday had a "rigged audience".
Farage has now spit his dummy out and made an official complaint about Channel 4 to OFCOM, he's also refused to appear on various BBC News and Current Affairs programmes.
He's not playing any more
Meanwhile a poll conducted by "Britain Elects" asking the question [Which channel will you be watching the election coverage on election night] has found that the BBC is the clear favourite once again, with SKY, ITV and GB News trailing far behind, with 20,000 votes so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Jun 29, 2024 18:03:28 GMT
The man's an idiot. But in his own way he is standing up for minorities who so often tend to be discriminated against. I think his way of expressing this is certainly open to assertions of racism, though he has yet to call a white politician an "effing honky". When he does I will condemn in in far more forthright terms than you appear willing to do over someone being called an "effing P*ki". Indeed in your response to me you have not addressed that comment at all, merely indulged in yet more whataboutery that effectively ignores that and instead says what about this guy instead. Whataboutery is deflection designed to avoid comment and shift the discourse elsewhere rather than actually address the point in hand. Until you do so you will not get much from me about anything else you attempt to divert the discussion on to. Do you regard calling someone an effing P*ki unacceptable or not? Is it in your view racist language? If not, why not? If so, why do you see no problem with obvious racists in this thread belittling it as no big deal? And instead do what they so often do and try and change the subject with a convenient bit of whataboutery? Jeez. Racism is ok when it suits you ! Ffs, Thus merely explodes your rank hypocrisy. Whataboutery has nothing to do with it . His Favourite drink is “WHITE MANS TEARS “ you are just as racist as him . Thank you for pointing that out . I doubt he actually quaffs “WHITE MANS TEARS” (sic), but I have to admit that I occasionally get a nice warm feeling when some voluble racist bigot gets shown up in the media — and doubly so if they’re shown to be an ill-informed (OK, poorly educated) oaf. I don’t think that makes me a White-hating (insert whatever noun you have in your vocabulary), Christ, I actually married a Whitie, and have not regretted one single minute — not even when (shush, Mrs reads this)… |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2024 18:16:37 GMT
Jeez. Racism is ok when it suits you ! Ffs, Thus merely explodes your rank hypocrisy. Whataboutery has nothing to do with it . His Favourite drink is “WHITE MANS TEARS “ you are just as racist as him . Thank you for pointing that out . I doubt he actually quaffs “WHITE MANS TEARS” (sic), but I have to admit that I occasionally get a nice warm feeling when some voluble racist bigot gets shown up in the media — and doubly so if they’re shown to be an ill-informed (OK, poorly educated) oaf. So, you defend racist bigots in Labour because you share their racist views. Before you respond, keep in mind that your racist hero directed his racist views toward all white people. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jun 29, 2024 18:16:52 GMT
That’s marvellous but you like TTL are making assumptions,is it to suit your narrative? please find a single post where I’ve said it is ok to call Sunak an effing Pak* If you don’t which I am 100% sure you won’t I expect you like TTL will not retract what you’ve said. This is highly disingenuous of you. I have never said that you regard the comment as acceptable. I have said that others around here seem to have no problem with it. What I have said is that in your responses to me you have not yourself expressed any condemnation for such racist language or those who seek to defend it, instead trying to change the subject with whataboutery. If I want to talk about the Labour candidate for Clacton, some twat who said something stupid in some other party or whatever it might be I would join a thread about it or start one of my own....the subject matter here is the acceptability or otherwise of calling someone an "effing P*ki". Until that is addressed by you I will not be discussing your other preferred topics here. When you do address it we can maybe have a sensible discussion that takes full account of those other related issues and persons. Not today though. I honestly thought you were a more honest debater than this, and since I feel rather irritated at your transparent obfuscations I will say goodnight to you and maybe return tomorrow. Right now I feel a yearning to be off to relax. Enjoy your evening. Honest?really did you even bother to look at the link I posted to TTL he’s another who looks and decides on someone’s thoughts,who do you think you are I've never expected you to justify your stance which is what you’re doing now. Why in gods name we have courts and a jury who knows when people like you can decide on something somebody didn’t say. You said you knew me obviously not,I have been honest with both you and TTL and in fact gone out of my way to be polite and not name call him and patiently replied because I was led to believe he’d suffered some sort of illness. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 18:23:15 GMT
Jeez. Racism is ok when it suits you ! Ffs, Thus merely explodes your rank hypocrisy. Whataboutery has nothing to do with it . His Favourite drink is “WHITE MANS TEARS “ you are just as racist as him . Thank you for pointing that out . I doubt he actually quaffs “WHITE MANS TEARS” (sic), but I have to admit that I occasionally get a nice warm feeling when some voluble racist bigot gets shown up in the media — and doubly so if they’re shown to be an ill-informed (OK, poorly educated) oaf. I don’t think that makes me a White-hating (insert whatever noun you have in your vocabulary), Christ, I actually married a Whitie, and have not regretted one single minute — not even when (shush, Mrs reads this)… I think that you are making excuses for a black racist . If a white reform candidate said that he drank’ black man’s tears ‘ and was standing for the white people in his constituency, you would cry racism and you know it . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 18:24:44 GMT
I doubt he actually quaffs “WHITE MANS TEARS” (sic), but I have to admit that I occasionally get a nice warm feeling when some voluble racist bigot gets shown up in the media — and doubly so if they’re shown to be an ill-informed (OK, poorly educated) oaf. So, you defend racist bigots in Labour because you share their racist views. Before you respond, keep in mind that your racist hero directed his racist views toward all white people. Yup another leftie going “ yeah but no but’ when faced with racism against whites . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 18:27:11 GMT
So Farage lashes out at not one, but two of our national broadcasters now He insists that Andrew Parker, the man who made various toxic and racist remarks was a plant, planted as an actor by Channel 4 to smear Reform UK, yet he has presented no evidence for such a claim, and Despatches have issued a statement rigorously denying the claim. Next comes Farage's other baseless claim, again with no evidence, that the BBC's flagship "Question Time" on which he appeared on Friday had a "rigged audience". Farage has now spit his dummy out and made an official complaint about Channel 4 to OFCOM, he's also refused to appear on various BBC News and Current Affairs programmes. He's not playing any more Meanwhile a poll conducted by "Britain Elects" asking the question [Which channel will you be watching the election coverage on election night] has found that the BBC is the clear favourite once again, with SKY, ITV and GB News trailing far behind, with 20,000 votes so far. How does making a complaint against a deliberate smear equate to ‘ spitting his dummy out’ when you make a complaint are you ‘ spitting your dummy out “? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jun 29, 2024 18:30:19 GMT
So Farage lashes out at not one, but two of our national broadcasters now He insists that Andrew Parker, the man who made various toxic and racist remarks was a plant, planted as an actor by Channel 4 to smear Reform UK, yet he has presented no evidence for such a claim, and Despatches have issued a statement rigorously denying the claim. Next comes Farage's other baseless claim, again with no evidence, that the BBC's flagship "Question Time" on which he appeared on Friday had a "rigged audience". Farage has now spit his dummy out and made an official complaint about Channel 4 to OFCOM, he's also refused to appear on various BBC News and Current Affairs programmes. He's not playing any more Meanwhile a poll conducted by "Britain Elects" asking the question [Which channel will you be watching the election coverage on election night] has found that the BBC is the clear favourite once again, with SKY, ITV and GB News trailing far behind, with 20,000 votes so far. How does making a complaint against a deliberate smear equate to ‘ spitting his dummy out’ when you make a complaint are you ‘ spitting your dummy out “? Simple, because as stated in my post, Farage has not presented any evidence to back his claim, and unless he can do so, I reckon that OFCOM will tell him to go away and stop been so stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 29, 2024 18:33:31 GMT
How does making a complaint against a deliberate smear equate to ‘ spitting his dummy out’ when you make a complaint are you ‘ spitting your dummy out “? Simple, because as stated in my post, Farage has not presented any evidence to back his claim, and unless he can do so, I reckon that OFCOM will tell him to go away and stop been so stupid. Are you going to spit your dummy out now ? |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Jun 29, 2024 18:39:11 GMT
www.gbnews.com/politics/reform-uk-channel-4-elections-watchdog-election-interferenceSounds about right from Nigel Farage . "The closer you get to the target the more flack you get " I just hope they find out who are behind this . The left have been after Farage for years so I make them favourites but the deeply hurt Sunak has put himself in the frame with his very public offendedness . As Farage says ,it just doesn't add up with the actor even having worked for channel 4 in the past . .Sounds like Channel 4 are going to have some explaining to do But the damage is done ,the seed has been planted in peoples minds to go along with last weeks "I love Putin" headlines .We knew this would get dirty and boy is it . You can smell the fear ...Vote Reform and get rid of these aholes but I think Nigel needs a counter punch to rectify the damage done by these liars ,revealing the truth would be a start .
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jun 29, 2024 18:53:01 GMT
Simple, because as stated in my post, Farage has not presented any evidence to back his claim, and unless he can do so, I reckon that OFCOM will tell him to go away and stop been so stupid. Are you going to spit your dummy out now ? There is absolutely nothing within the article to suggest that Channel 4 set Reform UK up, or planted an actor, it is all circumstantial, a supposition, a theory. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Jun 29, 2024 18:59:51 GMT
So Farage lashes out at not one, but two of our national broadcasters now He insists that Andrew Parker, the man who made various toxic and racist remarks was a plant, planted as an actor by Channel 4 to smear Reform UK, yet he has presented no evidence for such a claim, and Despatches have issued a statement rigorously denying the claim. Next comes Farage's other baseless claim, again with no evidence, that the BBC's flagship "Question Time" on which he appeared on Friday had a "rigged audience". Farage has now spit his dummy out and made an official complaint about Channel 4 to OFCOM, he's also refused to appear on various BBC News and Current Affairs programmes. He's not playing any more Meanwhile a poll conducted by "Britain Elects" asking the question [Which channel will you be watching the election coverage on election night] has found that the BBC is the clear favourite once again, with SKY, ITV and GB News trailing far behind, with 20,000 votes so far. Hardly baseless. A random audience would be filled with about 20% Reform supporters who would tend to clap the man they see as leader of Reform, the questions were all deigned to highlight what the BBC see as Reform's weak point and did not cover much other ground as regards policies. The 'impartial chairwoman' was primed with 'fact check' information to refute Reform's figures. The 'impartial chairwoman' was aggressive and interruptive when supplying 'detail' and asking more questions than the audience put together. As regards the Andrew Parker saga the facts are clear unless you know different. The first day of this man on the job he was attached to the Channel 4 team who seemingly had that first day on the job as well. After the incident was reported he was asked if he was an actor, he denied it, he then said he was an actor. He had spent all day talking in his 'acting' voice when his normal voice is different both in tone and accent, why would one do that unless some deception was intended? Channel 4 went undercover and scored a 'scoop' within a few hours with a first time canvasser. Covering the election results should be an expertise of the BBC as they have been doing it many years before the others got off the ground. There is also little scope to affect results with bias. |
|
