|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 26, 2024 7:55:28 GMT
You implied and are now backpedaling. Now get your pudding and stop mirroring my posts You being dishonest proves nothing, so it is up to you to prove the point you make. Which I know you can't LOL Dishonest? You silly old fart ! Im not the one who claimed Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“…and then proceeds to tell us all that he is a liar and/ or you don’t understand what Socialism means . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 26, 2024 13:10:52 GMT
You being dishonest proves nothing, so it is up to you to prove the point you make. Which I know you can't LOL Dishonest? You silly old fart ! Im not the one who claimed Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“…and then proceeds to tell us all that he is a liar and/ or you don’t understand what Socialism means . I never said that he was a liar, that makes you a liar, you silly and sad middle aged? fart. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 26, 2024 13:12:42 GMT
More idiocy from you, I never said Starmer didn't say he was a Socialist but I have already made it clear in my previous posts that he has moved to the centre left of politics. Just ask any Socialist you can find, where Starmer's politics have taken him to. And it certainly not to Socialism. So he's a liar in your own opinion Liar ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 26, 2024 13:19:55 GMT
Dishonest? You silly old fart ! Im not the one who claimed Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“…and then proceeds to tell us all that he is a liar and/ or you don’t understand what Socialism means . I never said that he was a liar, that makes you a liar, you silly and sad middle aged? fart. Then you claim that Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“.. so either he doesn’t know what that means or you don’t . This has all been explained to you seenile . Now go back to your nap there’s a good boy . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 26, 2024 13:36:08 GMT
I never said that he was a liar, that makes you a liar, you silly and sad middle aged? fart. Then you claim that Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“.. so either he doesn’t know what that means or you don’t . He knows and I know what it means, it is your stunted logic that stops you looking at the reality. In short, do you think Starmer wants to reintroduce 'Clause 4, and Socialism onto the UK? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 26, 2024 13:56:57 GMT
Then you claim that Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“.. so either he doesn’t know what that means or you don’t . He knows and I know what it means, it is your stunted logic that stops you looking at the reality. In short, do you think Starmer wants to reintroduce 'Clause 4, and Socialism onto the UK? Oh when he says “I would describe myself as a socialist.“but isn’t and needs his little old superannuated fanboy to explain what he REALLY meant that means Starmer and you are on the same wavelength. That explains a lot . Keep digging quack , maybe you’ll strike oil 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 26, 2024 14:11:26 GMT
Then you claim that Starmer said “ I would describe myself as a socialist.“.. so either he doesn’t know what that means or you don’t . He knows and I know what it means, it is your stunted logic that stops you looking at the reality. In short, do you think Starmer wants to reintroduce 'Clause 4, and Socialism onto the UK? Yes Starmer the socialist looked dapper at the state banquet Sir Keir loves the pomp and ceremony and the trappings of wealth and champagne corks, rubbing shoulders with the Wealthy World elite .... yes Starmer the socialist the man of the poor.... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 27, 2024 7:16:45 GMT
He knows and I know what it means, it is your stunted logic that stops you looking at the reality. In short, do you think Starmer wants to reintroduce 'Clause 4, and Socialism onto the UK? Oh when he says “I would describe myself as a socialist.“but isn’t and needs his little old superannuated fanboy to explain what he REALLY meant that means Starmer and you are on the same wavelength. That explains a lot . Keep digging quack , maybe you’ll strike oil 😉 Maybe you would care to answer my questions in the post you pretend to reply to? Your avoidance of them exposes the fact that you do actually understand the silliness of your whinging against him, but you just can't help being a useless argumentative moron. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 27, 2024 7:21:20 GMT
He knows and I know what it means, it is your stunted logic that stops you looking at the reality. In short, do you think Starmer wants to reintroduce 'Clause 4, and Socialism onto the UK? Yes Starmer the socialist looked dapper at the state banquet Sir Keir loves the pomp and ceremony and the trappings of wealth and champagne corks, rubbing shoulders with the Wealthy World elite .... yes Starmer the socialist the man of the poor.... LOL Someone with limited intellect would find it difficult to understand that being well off does not mean that one isn't interested in making the UK more efficient and more self reliant in order to increase wealth and stability, for the many, including you. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 8:04:31 GMT
Yes Starmer the socialist looked dapper at the state banquet Sir Keir loves the pomp and ceremony and the trappings of wealth and champagne corks, rubbing shoulders with the Wealthy World elite .... yes Starmer the socialist the man of the poor.... LOL Someone with limited intellect would find it difficult to understand that being well off does not mean that one isn't interested in making the UK more efficient and more self reliant in order to increase wealth and stability, for the many, including you.My wealth is doing fantastic thank you ... that's why I do not want a Labour government in.
I want you to answer me this.... none of your bullshit avoidance tactic... I want a straight 'honest' answer for a change.
If you reckon Labour/Starmer are going to 'increase wealth and stability. for the many'
Answer me this, do you think it's only the wealthy who drive cars?
Starmer/Labour government are going to CLOBBER drivers/road uses, they are making a FUCKIN fortune out of the many including YOU.
They are going to price drivers off the roads, that would include mainly the MANY LESS WELL OFF, the wealthy will be able to afford their charges.
20mpz ULEZ all a big fat Labour money making con... the poor will not be able to afford to keep their old bangers on the road.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 27, 2024 8:32:03 GMT
Oh when he says “I would describe myself as a socialist.“but isn’t and needs his little old superannuated fanboy to explain what he REALLY meant that means Starmer and you are on the same wavelength. That explains a lot . Keep digging quack , maybe you’ll strike oil 😉 Maybe you would care to answer my questions in the post you pretend to reply to? Your avoidance of them exposes the fact that you do actually understand the silliness of your whinging against him, but you just can't help being a useless argumentative moron. I don’t have to indulge your obfuscation ,you sllly old fart . You told us that Starmer said “I would describe myself as a socialist.” and then told us he wasn’t . So either Starmer is lying , Starmer doesn’t know what Socialism is or you are a liar and/ or you don’t know what Socialism is. This has been explained to you several times no more than one poster . Pointing out your idiocy isn’t whinging seenile . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 8:52:05 GMT
Sadly many Labour voters are made up of people who can't think for themselves, if Starmer says he's a socialist then he's a socialist because he said so.
If Starmer says he'll sort out the illegal migrant crossing then he's going to sort it, because he said so.
If Starmer says he'll sort out the Gaza conflict then he's going to sort it, because he said so ....
Lefties don't question the why and the wherefore they just believe him because he said it.
Remembering the Remoaner anti-Brexit protesters when they were asked what it was they missed about no being members of the EU anymore, they were all dumbstruck, until eventually after about 3 hours some old dear said ....... I can't get my German tablecloths any more ...... FFS
sheep baa baa baa
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 27, 2024 10:37:07 GMT
Someone with limited intellect would find it difficult to understand that being well off does not mean that one isn't interested in making the UK more efficient and more self reliant in order to increase wealth and stability, for the many, including you.My wealth is doing fantastic thank you ... that's why I do not want a Labour government in.
I want you to answer me this.... none of your bullshit avoidance tactic... I want a straight 'honest' answer for a change.
If you reckon Labour/Starmer are going to 'increase wealth and stability. for the many'
Answer me this, do you think it's only the wealthy who drive cars?
Starmer/Labour government are going to CLOBBER drivers/road uses, they are making a FUCKIN fortune out of the many including YOU.
They are going to price drivers off the roads, that would include mainly the MANY LESS WELL OFF, the wealthy will be able to afford their charges.
20mpz ULEZ all a big fat Labour money making con... the poor will not be able to afford to keep their old bangers on the road.
The benefit of a healthy economy and healthy people for the country goes far beyond your personal wealth. The highlighted part of your post is opinionated nonsense. Silly question. ULEZ was introduced in a specific area because of the ill health pollution was causing. Its just Conservative nonsense 'Project Fear' to imply it will be spread by a Labour government. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 27, 2024 10:41:42 GMT
Maybe you would care to answer my questions in the post you pretend to reply to? Your avoidance of them exposes the fact that you do actually understand the silliness of your whinging against him, but you just can't help being a useless argumentative moron. I don’t have to indulge your obfuscation ,you sllly old fart . You told us that Starmer said “I would describe myself as a socialist.” and then told us he wasn’t . So either Starmer is lying , Starmer doesn’t know what Socialism is or you are a liar and/ or you don’t know what Socialism is. This has been explained to you several times no more than one poster . Pointing out your idiocy isn’t whinging seenile . Your silliness aimed at ignoring the reality has been destroyed many times. Nothing could prove your silliness more than your refusal to answer my questions, AND YOU KNOW IT. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 27, 2024 10:43:27 GMT
My wealth is doing fantastic thank you ... that's why I do not want a Labour government in.
I want you to answer me this.... none of your bullshit avoidance tactic... I want a straight 'honest' answer for a change.
If you reckon Labour/Starmer are going to 'increase wealth and stability. for the many'
Answer me this, do you think it's only the wealthy who drive cars?
Starmer/Labour government are going to CLOBBER drivers/road uses, they are making a FUCKIN fortune out of the many including YOU.
They are going to price drivers off the roads, that would include mainly the MANY LESS WELL OFF, the wealthy will be able to afford their charges.
20mpz ULEZ all a big fat Labour money making con... the poor will not be able to afford to keep their old bangers on the road.
The benefit of a healthy economy and healthy people for the country goes far beyond your personal wealth. The highlighted part of your post is opinionated nonsense. Silly question. ULEZ was introduced in a specific area because of the ill health pollution was causing. Its just Conservative nonsense 'Project Fear' to imply it will be spread by a Labour government. I hope you are sitting down when you read this .....
For 2022, the money generated from ULEZ between the 9th of January 2022 to the 7th of January 2023 was £230m, of which £150m came from daily charges levied on drivers of non-compliant vehicles entering the zone and £80m from PCN income
This money ^^ comes of the backs of hard working 'ORDINARY' people on the streets, it has FUCK ALL to do with 'ill health pollution was causing' ... this is Labour destroying the working man, £230m Labour are going to DESTROY everyone livelihoods ........ you are a utter disgrace back a Labour government who would penalise drivers so they can balance the books of BUST Labour council gross incompetence.
|
|
