|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 24, 2024 20:47:27 GMT
Come back when / if he reintroduces Clause 4, which Blair dropped from his New Labour approach. Till then I will probably ignore your waffle on this point  He can introduce what he wants . He still said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ And his fanboy is still trying to excuse it. What he said is not in dispute what he has done so far indicates he has no intention of imposing socialism on anyone. But his enemies will do their best to denigrate him because that is the normal thing for them to do. Denigration, insinuation, deviation and more, is the bedrock of Conservative dishonesty. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 24, 2024 20:53:57 GMT
He can introduce what he wants . He still said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ And his fanboy is still trying to excuse it. What he said is not in dispute what he has done so far indicates he has no intention of imposing socialism on anyone. But his enemies will do their best to denigrate him because that is the normal thing for them to do. Denigration, insinuation, deviation and more, is the bedrock of Conservative dishonesty. So you're saying he's a liar, then? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 24, 2024 20:54:28 GMT
He can introduce what he wants . He still said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ And his fanboy is still trying to excuse it. What he said is not in dispute what he has done so far indicates he has no intention of imposing socialism on anyone. But his enemies will do their best to denigrate him because that is the normal thing for them to do. Denigration, insinuation, deviation and more, is the bedrock of Conservative dishonesty. I never insinuated that he said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ . You told us . Even more waffle from you doesn’t changes that . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 24, 2024 21:05:50 GMT
What he said is not in dispute what he has done so far indicates he has no intention of imposing socialism on anyone. But his enemies will do their best to denigrate him because that is the normal thing for them to do. Denigration, insinuation, deviation and more, is the bedrock of Conservative dishonesty. I never insinuated that he said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ . You told us . Even more waffle from you doesn’t changes that . See, Starmer's a socialist except when he isn't. And he is when it suits See2's agenda but not when it doesn't. Clear as mud? 🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 25, 2024 5:42:41 GMT
What he said is not in dispute what he has done so far indicates he has no intention of imposing socialism on anyone. But his enemies will do their best to denigrate him because that is the normal thing for them to do. Denigration, insinuation, deviation and more, is the bedrock of Conservative dishonesty. I never insinuated that he said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ . You told us . Even more waffle from you doesn’t changes that . I never said you insinuated anything that reference was about the norm for Righties. Are you for real? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 25, 2024 5:47:08 GMT
I never insinuated that he said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ . You told us . Even more waffle from you doesn’t changes that . See, Starmer's a socialist except when he isn't. And he is when it suits See2's agenda but not when it doesn't. Clear as mud? 🙄 More idiocy from you, I never said Starmer didn't say he was a Socialist but I have already made it clear in my previous posts that he has moved to the centre left of politics. Just ask any Socialist you can find, where Starmer's politics have taken him to. And it certainly not to Socialism. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 25, 2024 12:07:40 GMT
Which part of his own words “I would describe myself as a socialist.'' is beyond your comprehension ? Or does his confusion about being able to define a woman and supporting self ID ( A man identifies as a woman/a cat/ a BBQ etc so they are people worthy of respect and mustn't be toxic  ) extend outside the woke? Just one more of your posts that exposes your limited thinking. Limited thinking? What on earth is your idiotic prattling about now? Sir Kneeler himself says he is a socialist - he is on public record as making this statement You , however , are calling him a liar for stating his own label for himself - Is it ESP , delusions or how else do you conclude that your idol is a barefaced liar on his poltical ideology |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 25, 2024 12:10:17 GMT
See, Starmer's a socialist except when he isn't. And he is when it suits See2's agenda but not when it doesn't. Clear as mud? 🙄 More idiocy from you, I never said Starmer didn't say he was a Socialist but I have already made it clear in my previous posts that he has moved to the centre left of politics. Just ask any Socialist you can find, where Starmer's politics have taken him to. And it certainly not to Socialism. So he's a liar in your own opinion |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 25, 2024 12:23:50 GMT
I never insinuated that he said “I would describe myself as a socialist.“ . You told us . Even more waffle from you doesn’t changes that . I never said you insinuated anything that reference was about the norm for Righties. Are you for real? You implied it. Get your carer to read out the post that you forgot about . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 25, 2024 18:28:06 GMT
Just one more of your posts that exposes your limited thinking. Limited thinking? What on earth is your idiotic prattling about now? Sir Kneeler himself says he is a socialist - he is on public record as making this statement You , however , are calling him a liar for stating his own label for himself - Is it ESP , delusions or how else do you conclude that your idol is a barefaced liar on his poltical ideology With your limited intellect and ability to ignore the relevant information on Starmer and his political position that I have posted, (you being so politically biased and prepared to create a lie) I would not expect an intelligent reply to my post from you, and didn't get one. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 25, 2024 18:32:38 GMT
I never said you insinuated anything that reference was about the norm for Righties. Are you for real? You implied it. Get your carer to read out the post that you forgot about . If you thought I implied it, then I have already explained in a following reply to you, that it wasn't an insinuation, that it was a general comment on the typical language from Righties. It seems that your carer has let you down again. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 25, 2024 18:40:38 GMT
You implied it. Get your carer to read out the post that you forgot about . If you thought I implied it, then I have already explained in a following reply to you, that it wasn't an insinuation, that it was a general comment on the typical language from Righties. It seems that your carer has let you down again. You implied and are now backpedaling. Now get your pudding and stop mirroring my posts |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 25, 2024 19:29:33 GMT
See, Starmer's a socialist except when he isn't. And he is when it suits See2's agenda but not when it doesn't. Clear as mud? 🙄 More idiocy from you, I never said Starmer didn't say he was a Socialist but I have already made it clear in my previous posts that he has moved to the centre left of politics. Just ask any Socialist you can find, where Starmer's politics have taken him to. And it certainly not to Socialism. Say you're saying he's a liar. And again, I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 26, 2024 5:39:55 GMT
If you thought I implied it, then I have already explained in a following reply to you, that it wasn't an insinuation, that it was a general comment on the typical language from Righties. It seems that your carer has let you down again. You implied and are now backpedaling. Now get your pudding and stop mirroring my posts You being dishonest proves nothing, so it is up to you to prove the point you make. Which I know you can't LOL |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 26, 2024 5:45:14 GMT
More idiocy from you, I never said Starmer didn't say he was a Socialist but I have already made it clear in my previous posts that he has moved to the centre left of politics. Just ask any Socialist you can find, where Starmer's politics have taken him to. And it certainly not to Socialism. Say you're saying he's a liar. And again, I agree. It is obvious that you are either stupid and don't even understand the English language, or that you are just a stupid liar. Trying to be clever, which you are not LOL |
|
) extend outside the woke?