|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 11, 2024 11:46:50 GMT
On what grounds is it good for Britain?... Reform offers the one genuine counterpoint to the establishment dogma propounded by every other party. Farage has only really ever had one Political Schtick - leaving the EU, He told us it would be great. We believed him. I believed him. He was monumentally WRONG... Except that he wasn't. You are.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 11, 2024 11:48:32 GMT
So if you are going to surrender National Sovereignty to Big Business in the name of Profit what was the point in wresting National Sovereignty back from the EU? The UK has no real Economic Freedoms when those freedoms are shackled by the whims of the Markets, and the unelected Bankers who control the Markets. At least with our Sovereignty in the hands of the EU there was a minimal degree of democratic accountability; with it in the hands of the Markets there is none at all. You reasoning is internally inconsistent; as is often the case with those who follow demagogues. All The Best Look, I get it. You don't like Farage in Parliament. And you don't like the UK out of the EU. I'm still undecided whether you like democracy or not. However, you've not long made a post about how there was no democratic accountability in the EU. Now you're making excuses of why we should place our sovereignty in the hands of the EU because there is a "minimal degree of democratic accountability". You're all over the place. 1) Don't give a fuck about Farage, just think it moronic that some think he is the political messiah. 2) I voted for Brexit, and believe that the UK our of the EU, with a competent deal, is the best way forward. 3) I am 100% committed to Democracy, I want much, MUCH MORE Direct Democracy. 4) There was "minimal" Democratic Accountability in the EU - we elected MEPS, even you are aware of this, right?. That "minimal" level is still 1000 times more than we have over those who control the Markets in their own interests. YOU have argued that National Sovereignty should NOT act as a hurdle to the economic desires of the Markets. It is YOU who has rejected Democratic Accountability, in favour of more profits for the 1%ers. It is not me who is all over the place, it is YOU. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 11, 2024 11:49:17 GMT
On what grounds is it good for Britain?... Reform offers the one genuine counterpoint to the establishment dogma propounded by every other party. Farage has only really ever had one Political Schtick - leaving the EU, He told us it would be great. We believed him. I believed him. He was monumentally WRONG... Except that he wasn't. You are. So we are better off now we are out? I mean I agree we are democratically better off, but that is all. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jul 11, 2024 11:50:10 GMT
Surely "the public" encompasses all UK citizens, including the sub-set eligible to vote? All The Best The ''public'' and the ''electorate'' are different concepts , the former includes those who are not eligible to vote in a general election eg most prisoners , Peers, most foreign born residents, children , the insane etc . Thus only some of the public are eligible to be entered onto the electoral roll and of that fraction , some voted for labour and elected a labour mp in their area , most of the electorate did not Who won the most seats again? All The Best
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 11, 2024 11:54:14 GMT
Nope, sorry Nulla. Try this post from Vinny. Not to mention the many, many people who've seen their wages rise. If Brexit has failed to deliver as promised it's because it still hasn't been fully implemented. But then what else did we expect with Remainers in charge of Brexit.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jul 11, 2024 12:01:59 GMT
Look, I get it. You don't like Farage in Parliament. And you don't like the UK out of the EU. I'm still undecided whether you like democracy or not. However, you've not long made a post about how there was no democratic accountability in the EU. Now you're making excuses of why we should place our sovereignty in the hands of the EU because there is a "minimal degree of democratic accountability". You're all over the place. Problem is, those are you words not mine. And you entered this debate discussing Farage so you clearly do give a fuck. And what you regard as a competent deal; some may regard as incompetent. Opinions. Democracy. Well you won't get that shackled to the EU, but I could imagine how you'd react to a party like Reform getting its way with direct democracy. You'd just berate Reform voters still the same. See where this is going? Yes, I remember that's where Farage was a fox in the henhouse. And the same thing doesn't happen in the EU does it. You are aware of the lobbyists over there, right? Wrong. National sovereignty acted as a hurdle to the desire of the EU's economic, political and social hegemony. You are making baseless assumptions all from me calling Nigel a fox. You've gone way out on a limb there like you have done throughout. You have an issue with democracy full stop. You've shown us this with you gambit about the monarchy. It seems, YOU only want a democracy that suits YOU. And if anyone votes for people or parties you don't like you make insinuations and generalisations about them. That's my take from your chip on the shoulder rants. Sorry about the quoting, I am a digital immigrant.
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jul 11, 2024 12:41:54 GMT
The ''public'' and the ''electorate'' are different concepts , the former includes those who are not eligible to vote in a general election eg most prisoners , Peers, most foreign born residents, children , the insane etc . Thus only some of the public are eligible to be entered onto the electoral roll and of that fraction , some voted for labour and elected a labour mp in their area , most of the electorate did not Who won the most seats again? All The Best I'm not denying that - I'm denying the preposterous claim from c2 that ''the public'' voted Labour Most of the ''The public ''didn't vote labour ''Some ''of the electorate voted labour , and some of the electorate who voted labour and who live in a constituency with sufficient other members of the electorate who also voted labour elected a labour mp . Most of the electorate who voted voted for parties other than labour.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jul 11, 2024 14:30:34 GMT
I think more and more people are realising that the Labour Party's lack of mandate is unsustainable in the long term so it would be instructive to have a referendum on PR just to see how many people would actually prefer to change the system.
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 11, 2024 15:08:58 GMT
we know that. Then point is the public didnt elect labour............the dodgy discredited FPTP system did. Starmer couldnt even reach the long term benchmark of 40% for a majority government under the discredited FPTP such was his absolute failure to win over voters . What a stupid fucking comment only an imbecile would make. Everyone in scotland could vote for the parties I have supported , and they still couldnt make up the uk government . Despite your discontent and your need to throw mud at Labour, only the public could elect Labour, and they did. Your comment is irrelevant, you had the option to vote Labour, and didn't. two thirds of us who turned out ,and 80 % of the electorate didnt vote labour, yet we got a labour landslide via the discredited fptp dodgy system. How far do you wish to stack the odds against the wishes of the public? Are you going to wait till we get 10% turnouts , and government landslides on single digit figures before you see there is a problem? When people can't rely on the ballot box , as we have seen in many places including the 6 counties of the north of Ireland , violence then becomes the only option . Is that what you want , or dont you care as long as slimy bar stewards like starmer have the odds stacked in his favour?
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jul 11, 2024 15:19:32 GMT
Then point is the public didnt elect labour............the dodgy discredited FPTP system did. But when granted an opportunity to reject the broken FPTP system the Public CHOSE to retain FPTP. Therefore the Public not only chose the system of election, they ELECTED Labour using that system. Ergo, you are demonstrably wrong. NOTE: I say that as someone who has long advocated PR rather than FPTP, in fact I was saying that back in the 90's, long before the 2011 referendum. All The Best no if I mind correct , and thirteen years seems like a long time ago now , the public rejected AV. Rejecting AV isnt an endorsement of FPTP. Why dont we have a referendum on do we want to keep the FPTP system , where England is the only country now , or shall I say the Westminster parliament , to use a non PR model in Western Europe. I dont think it's a coincidence the uk is one of the most politically unstable states in Western Europe. Then , when we see wether the public like or dislike FPTP , we can then have a second referendum to agree which system people prefer the most. where? Just because you add two and two and make five doesn't make me demonstrably wrong. Are you saying the public at large think a party getting 64% of seats on a mere 33.7% of the vote is acceptable? The low turnout itself is an indicator of how the public feel disillusioned and aren't engaging in politics. The root cause being why bother to vote when my vote won't count?
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jul 11, 2024 15:28:31 GMT
But when granted an opportunity to reject the broken FPTP system the Public CHOSE to retain FPTP. Therefore the Public not only chose the system of election, they ELECTED Labour using that system. Ergo, you are demonstrably wrong. NOTE: I say that as someone who has long advocated PR rather than FPTP, in fact I was saying that back in the 90's, long before the 2011 referendum. All The Best no if I mind correct , and thirteen years seems like a long time ago now , the public rejected AV. Rejecting AV isnt an endorsement of FPTP. Why dont we have a referendum on do we want to keep the FPTP system , where England is the only country now , or shall I say the Westminster parliament , to use a non PR model in Western Europe. I dont think it's a coincidence the uk is one of the most politically unstable states in Western Europe. Then , when we see wether the public like or dislike FPTP , we can then have a second referendum to agree which system people prefer the most. where? Just because you add two and two and make five doesn't make me demonstrably wrong. Are you saying the public at large think a party getting 64% of seats on a mere 33.7% of the vote is acceptable? The low turnout itself is an indicator of how the public feel disillusioned and aren't engaging in politics. The root cause being why bother to vote when my vote won't count? Excellent post.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jul 11, 2024 15:49:00 GMT
Nope, sorry Nulla. Try this post from Vinny. Not to mention the many, many people who've seen their wages rise. If Brexit has failed to deliver as promised it's because it still hasn't been fully implemented. But then what else did we expect with Remainers in charge of Brexit. Or to mention the dire economic and social condition the UK is in. It used to be the claim that 'Its not our fault it all the fault of the EU', now its the fault of the Remainers. The faults in the UK are and have always been caused by ourselves.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jul 11, 2024 15:54:59 GMT
But when granted an opportunity to reject the broken FPTP system the Public CHOSE to retain FPTP. Therefore the Public not only chose the system of election, they ELECTED Labour using that system. Ergo, you are demonstrably wrong. NOTE: I say that as someone who has long advocated PR rather than FPTP, in fact I was saying that back in the 90's, long before the 2011 referendum. All The Best no if I mind correct , and thirteen years seems like a long time ago now , the public rejected AV. Rejecting AV isnt an endorsement of FPTP. Why dont we have a referendum on do we want to keep the FPTP system , where England is the only country now , or shall I say the Westminster parliament , to use a non PR model in Western Europe. I dont think it's a coincidence the uk is one of the most politically unstable states in Western Europe. Then , when we see wether the public like or dislike FPTP , we can then have a second referendum to agree which system people prefer the most. where? Just because you add two and two and make five doesn't make me demonstrably wrong. Are you saying the public at large think a party getting 64% of seats on a mere 33.7% of the vote is acceptable? The low turnout itself is an indicator of how the public feel disillusioned and aren't engaging in politics. The root cause being why bother to vote when my vote won't count? The electoral system is not the problem, political dishonesty, propaganda using lies and insinuated lies along with, in the main, pathetic political leaders and followers, is where the problem lays. Changing the system wont change people.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jul 11, 2024 15:56:42 GMT
I think more and more people are realising that the Labour Party's lack of mandate is unsustainable in the long term so it would be instructive to have a referendum on PR just to see how many people would actually prefer to change the system. Referendum is the pathway to hell.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jul 11, 2024 16:01:01 GMT
Who won the most seats again? All The Best I'm not denying that - I'm denying the preposterous claim from c2 that ''the public'' voted Labour Most of the ''The public ''didn't vote labour ''Some ''of the electorate voted labour , and some of the electorate who voted labour and who live in a constituency with sufficient other members of the electorate who also voted labour elected a labour mp . Most of the electorate who voted voted for parties other than labour. I never claimed that all the public voted Labour, but enough did, and that was the point. Your need to distort to, and resort to, dishonesty does nothing for your credibility.
|
|