|
|
Post by sandypine on May 25, 2024 19:43:13 GMT
Pillock. ZG, the BBC jumped on the impartiality bandwagon which is why the useless Ofcom woke up, because Starmer refused to take part. Essentially what the BBC through Ofcom are saying is, the audience should not have been allowed to question the prime minister because Starmer refused to take part. What a load of bollox. Hopefully GB News lawyers will take Ofcom to pieces. Pillock It wasn't the BBC hundreds of people complained. And we know their agenda. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 20:00:44 GMT
Pillock It wasn't the BBC hundreds of people complained. And we know their agenda. What all of them? Yes, I guess so, they all wanted a program where they got to question the putty answers they were given to their questions and not just listen to the biased summary of their host. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 25, 2024 20:07:22 GMT
And we know their agenda. What all of them? Yes, I guess so, they all wanted a program where they got to question the putty answers they were given to their questions and not just listen to the biased summary of their host. Probably all of them, we know they campaign to stop advertising on GB news through concerted action, it would be no surprise if it was found out the complaints were orchestrated. Ofcom probably know this but seem intent on investigating GB news as often as possible and largely ignoring everyone else. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 20:09:02 GMT
What all of them? Yes, I guess so, they all wanted a program where they got to question the putty answers they were given to their questions and not just listen to the biased summary of their host. Probably all of them, we know they campaign to stop advertising on GB news through concerted action, it would be no surprise if it was found out the complaints were orchestrated. Ofcom probably know this but seem intent on investigating GB news as often as possible and largely ignoring everyone else. Anything to back up that or just another conspiracy to explain away an inconvenient truth. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 25, 2024 20:31:38 GMT
Probably all of them, we know they campaign to stop advertising on GB news through concerted action, it would be no surprise if it was found out the complaints were orchestrated. Ofcom probably know this but seem intent on investigating GB news as often as possible and largely ignoring everyone else. Anything to back up that or just another conspiracy to explain away an inconvenient truth. Are you saying there is no campaign to stop advertisers using GB news? It is called stop funding hate and targets anyone advertising on GB news with campaigns through social media. It is no conspiracy theory to say it exists and is orchestrated by SFH as this shows from a SFH campaign. I have watched the BBC and the opposite view is taken and never challenged by hosts in fact they ask what can we do. It is a very severe farce and Ofcom are part of the process. "On 16 March, GB News’s Nana Akua show invited a guest who said that ‘the harms of climate change are still very much hypothetical and likened climate awareness to “climate catastrophism”. The host did not challenge these views, and the guests who appeared afterwards also each presented their own arguments against climate action. Together, Stop Funding Heat supporters will argue that this program failed to meet the requirement for ‘due impartiality and due accuracy’ — a requirement under Rule 5.1 of Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code. Submit your complaint to Ofcom using this form and by following the guidance below." Programme det |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 20:38:15 GMT
Anything to back up that or just another conspiracy to explain away an inconvenient truth. ? It is called stop funding hate and targets anyone advertising on GB news with campaigns through social media. It is no conspiracy theory to say it exists and is orchestrated by SFH as this shows from a SFH campaign. I have watched the BBC and the opposite view is taken and never challenged by hosts in fact they ask what can we do. It is a very severe farce and Ofcom are part of the process. "On 16 March, GB News’s Nana Akua show invited a guest who said that ‘the harms of climate change are still very much hypothetical and likened climate awareness to “climate catastrophism”. The host did not challenge these views, and the guests who appeared afterwards also each presented their own arguments against climate action. Together, Stop Funding Heat supporters will argue that this program failed to meet the requirement for ‘due impartiality and due accuracy’ — a requirement under Rule 5.1 of Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code. Submit your complaint to Ofcom using this form and by following the guidance below." Programme det No I'm saying its got fuck all to do with the ofcom finding. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on May 25, 2024 20:46:02 GMT
Are you saying there is no campaign to stop advertisers using GB news? It is called stop funding hate and targets anyone advertising on GB news with campaigns through social media. It is no conspiracy theory to say it exists and is orchestrated by SFH as this shows from a SFH campaign. I have watched the BBC and the opposite view is taken and never challenged by hosts in fact they ask what can we do. It is a very severe farce and Ofcom are part of the process. "On 16 March, GB News’s Nana Akua show invited a guest who said that ‘the harms of climate change are still very much hypothetical and likened climate awareness to “climate catastrophism”. The host did not challenge these views, and the guests who appeared afterwards also each presented their own arguments against climate action. Together, Stop Funding Heat supporters will argue that this program failed to meet the requirement for ‘due impartiality and due accuracy’ — a requirement under Rule 5.1 of Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code. Submit your complaint to Ofcom using this form and by following the guidance below." Programme det No I'm saying its got fuck all to do with the ofcom finding. Not so you referred to hundreds of complaints and related my comments as a conspiracy theory. Ofcom react to levels of complaints in the main and record those where over 50 have been received. So SFH think the more the merrier. What Ofcom 'find' as regards GB news is of course often at odds with what others do consistently. Some were up in arms about Rees-Mogg reporting breaking news but then became very silent when David Lammy did the same more openly and more brazenly. It is a biased game and you are whistling their tune. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 20:56:45 GMT
Pillock It wasn't the BBC hundreds of people complained. And we know their agenda. Indeed yes, 547 complaints. And you can just imagine who complained. However, many people including former Labour minister Bill Rammel have said they are very concerned by Ofcoms actions and support GB News legal action against Ofcom. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 21:00:41 GMT
No I'm saying its got fuck all to do with the ofcom finding. Not so you referred to hundreds of complaints and related my comments as a conspiracy theory. Ofcom react to levels of complaints in the main and record those where over 50 have been received. So SFH think the more the merrier. What Ofcom 'find' as regards GB news is of course often at odds with what others do consistently. Some were up in arms about Rees-Mogg reporting breaking news but then became very silent when David Lammy did the same more openly and more brazenly. It is a biased game and you are whistling their tune. Nope. The hundreds of complaints were from the audience of a specific show. You have no evidence that its a conspiracy. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 21:05:13 GMT
And we know their agenda. Indeed yes, 547 complaints. And you can just imagine who complained. However, many people including former Labour minister Bill Rammel have said they are very concerned by Ofcoms actions and support GB News legal action against Ofcom. Ofcom look at the complaint not just the number of people complaining. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 21:14:43 GMT
Indeed yes, 547 complaints. And you can just imagine who complained. However, many people including former Labour minister Bill Rammel have said they are very concerned by Ofcoms actions and support GB News legal action against Ofcom. Ofcom look at the complaint not just the number of people complaining. Should be easy for GB News lawyers then. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 21:44:15 GMT
Ofcom look at the complaint not just the number of people complaining. Should be easy for GB News lawyers then. Lets see. Are they the same ones Trump uses  |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 21:52:36 GMT
Should be easy for GB News lawyers then. Lets see. Are they the same ones Trump uses Is that the new toy zany? Looks like a fucking snooker ball jacking itself off...The Perfect likeness of you... |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 21:52:39 GMT
Should be easy for GB News lawyers then. Lets see. Are they the same ones Trump uses I wouldn't have thought so... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 22:37:30 GMT
Lets see. Are they the same ones Trump uses I wouldn't have thought so... Lawyers who jump ship when it gets too risky to continue. |
|
