|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 16:27:14 GMT
Kier starmer got a very smiley and easy interview from the BBC the other day. No hard questions or sneering doubts you see Tory MP's get... The left-wing BBC giving Labour an easy ride? Who'da thunk it, Zany?  BBC presenter Martine Croxall did break impartiality rules with ‘gleeful’ comment, broadcaster confirms...... link
BBC shows breached impartiality guidelines despite pledge to end bias ....... link
BBC rules it failed to meet impartiality standards on episode of The Papers...... link
BBC broke impartiality rules in report on Scottish Government handling of Alex Salmond complaints....... link
Ofcom finds BBC in breach of due impartiality rules..... link
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on May 25, 2024 16:28:12 GMT
And you understand that Tories will tend to get harder questions than Starmer because Starmer hasn’t actually done much that is significant. No I don't. For instance They could easily question how his policies will work in reality. Great British Energy? He wouldn’t know how they wouod work in reality . He could only speculate. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 17:13:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 17:41:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 17:54:08 GMT
Yes yes yes, we know that you twonk. But 'why' are GB News accused of breaking impartiality rules... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 18:21:57 GMT
Yes yes yes, we know that you twonk. But 'why' are GB News accused of breaking impartiality rules... Because the broke them numpty |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 18:28:09 GMT
Yes yes yes, we know that you twonk. But 'why' are GB News accused of breaking impartiality rules... Because the broke them numpty LOL, yes indeed. But why? Tell me why GB News broke impartiality rules... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 18:54:25 GMT
Because the broke them numpty Tell me why GB News broke impartiality rules... The silence says it all....Red |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 25, 2024 18:59:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 19:09:23 GMT
LOL, yes indeed. But why? Tell me why GB News broke impartiality rules... The silence says it all....Red It does seem to be a tad, deafening... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 19:10:26 GMT
Because the broke them numpty LOL, yes indeed. But why? Tell me why GB News broke impartiality rules... Do you understand what impartial means? They are supposed to ask balanced questions to both sides. While some of the audience’s questions provided some challenge to, and criticism of, the Government’s policies and performance, audience members were not able to challenge the
Prime Minister’s responses and the Presenter did not do this to any meaningful extent.
• The Prime Minister was able to set out some future policies that his Government planned to implement, if re-elected in the forthcoming UK General Election. Neither the audience or the
Presenter challenged or otherwise referred to significant alternative views on these.
• The Prime Minister criticised aspects of the Labour Party’s policies and performance. While
politicians are of course able to do this in programmes, licensees must ensure that due impartiality is preserved. Neither the Labour Party’s views or positions on those issues, or any
other significant views on those issues were included in the programme or given due weight.
• The Licensee did not, and was not able to, include a reference in the programme to an agreed future programme in which an appropriately wide range of significant views on the major matter would be presented and given due weight. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 19:12:08 GMT
The silence says it all....Red It does seem to be a tad, deafening... Its a shame you are unable to look it up for yourself. Still done it for you now |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on May 25, 2024 19:14:13 GMT
LOL, yes indeed. But why? Tell me why GB News broke impartiality rules... Do you understand what impartial means? They are supposed to ask balanced questions to both sides. While some of the audience’s questions provided some challenge to, and criticism of, the Government’s policies and performance, audience members were not able to challenge the
Prime Minister’s responses and the Presenter did not do this to any meaningful extent.
• The Prime Minister was able to set out some future policies that his Government planned to implement, if re-elected in the forthcoming UK General Election. Neither the audience or the
Presenter challenged or otherwise referred to significant alternative views on these.
• The Prime Minister criticised aspects of the Labour Party’s policies and performance. While
politicians are of course able to do this in programmes, licensees must ensure that due impartiality is preserved. Neither the Labour Party’s views or positions on those issues, or any
other significant views on those issues were included in the programme or given due weight.
• The Licensee did not, and was not able to, include a reference in the programme to an agreed future programme in which an appropriately wide range of significant views on the major matter would be presented and given due weight. BuT wOt RuLeZ dId tHeY bRAke? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on May 25, 2024 19:21:41 GMT
It does seem to be a tad, deafening... Its a shame you are unable to look it up for yourself. Still done it for you now Pillock. ZG, the BBC jumped on the impartiality bandwagon which is why the useless Ofcom woke up, because Starmer refused to take part. Essentially what the BBC through Ofcom are saying is, the audience should not have been allowed to question the prime minister because Starmer refused to take part. What a load of bollox. Hopefully GB News lawyers will take Ofcom to pieces. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on May 25, 2024 19:39:24 GMT
Its a shame you are unable to look it up for yourself. Still done it for you now Pillock. ZG, the BBC jumped on the impartiality bandwagon which is why the useless Ofcom woke up, because Starmer refused to take part. Essentially what the BBC through Ofcom are saying is, the audience should not have been allowed to question the prime minister because Starmer refused to take part. What a load of bollox. Hopefully GB News lawyers will take Ofcom to pieces. Pillock It wasn't the BBC hundreds of people complained. |
|
