|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 7, 2024 8:23:50 GMT
...I would like to contest that Time is a human conceptual idea … that has no basis in physical reality … So if time has no basis in physical reality why don't radioactive isotopes have instant half-life degradation? At its core time is a reflection of, and the medium through which, change in manifest and measured. Time can only not exist if one of the two following statements is false: 1) There is no observable or measurable change in anything at all, anywhere in the universe. 2) There are observable and measurable changes in the universe but they all happen simultaneously. Which of those statements is it that you would like to prete... ...erm claim is true? All The Best Time only exists … because our human consciousness INVENTED it … we conceptualised it to rationalise our understanding of the Reality we find ourselves in … this physical Universe…. which we obsessively observe and measure. … but then try and conceptualise it’s REALITY. 🤔 Evidence of Universe change … isn’t evidence TIME has physical existence. Elasticity. Measurement and observation can show us things we can tangibly touch …that are physically REAL to us … if we travel to where it is and more than one sense … and our instruments register it. … the Time it takes to travel there is irrelevant … Time is irrelevant(anyone can make Time irrelevant) …. and it shouldn’t be in REALITY equations … especially defining our understanding of our physical Universe. Hope this helps. 👍 Radio-active isotope half-life degradation might be an accurate measure of Time for scientists … but it’s not a watch I would strap on my wrist and climb a mountain … because the measurement isotopic degradation inaccuracy under changing gravity and other variables … would be so obvious … I might get the illusion … like Prof. Jim Al-Khalili … that I’m ageing less … when reality going back down to sea level tells me … it was a temporary scientist’s induced temporary illusion. Time measurements come down to Earth’s gravity with a bump when scientists haven’t got their heads in the clouds!😋 |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jun 7, 2024 8:32:44 GMT
If the maths is too complicated for you Dub, that's not our problem.
The onus of proof for this theory of yours is upon you, not us.
It is for YOU to put forward equations for analysis, not us.
You have stated, without any evidence whatsoever that radiation would not be a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 7, 2024 8:36:39 GMT
Hey, … you’re the guy who has been repeatedly ‘busted’ for failure to process the entertaining Membership-friendly evidence I’ve dropped here - You are right, some of it is entertaining, or rather entertainment, just like the X-Files. However, none of it peer-reviewed science. All The Best What you are getting here is an insight into what has been kept out of the peer-review realm for decades … the future science that has been around a very long time … but hidden … rumoured to exist … but is now just beginning to leak out of it’s hidden 😎domain ….too little, too late …. But better late than never. I was aware this stuff existed way back in the 70’s …and aware it was discussed in the 50’s and 60’s too … You guys are VERY SLOW thinking PEER-REVIEW is the cutting edge of super-advanced extra-terrestrial science. 😂👏 |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jun 7, 2024 8:38:27 GMT
No what we're getting are statements of faith, not fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 7, 2024 9:31:55 GMT
If the maths is too complicated for you Dub, that's not our problem. The onus of proof for this theory of yours is upon you, not us. It is for YOU to put forward equations for analysis, not us. You have stated, without any evidence whatsoever that radiation would not be a problem. So you either haven't the ability … or are too lazy to accurately translate the Hawking evidence you dropped into plain English? … for verification … the language of this Forum? ++++++++++++ I’m not categorically stating inter-stellar travel radiation won’t be a problem … based on the theoretical work aired in the Mark McCandlish video. …. you only have to monitor what is coming here … to have certain concerns …   …. whatever the risks are … we know these journeys are ‘survivable’ … which is the key thing. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jun 7, 2024 9:38:53 GMT
You don't know anything, you have no evidence and have provided nothing except statements of belief. You're no different to this guy:  He was wrong then, you are wrong now. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 7, 2024 17:11:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jun 7, 2024 18:12:56 GMT
You are right, some of it is entertaining, or rather entertainment, just like the X-Files. However, none of it peer-reviewed science. All The Best … rumoured to exist … but is now just beginning to leak out of it’s hidden 😎domain ….too little, too late …. But better late than never. I was aware this stuff existed way back in the 70’s …and aware it was discussed in the 50’s and 60’s too … You guys are VERY SLOW thinking PEER-REVIEW is the cutting edge of super-advanced extra-terrestrial science. 😂👏 Complete and utter delusional, irrational BULLSHIT. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jun 7, 2024 18:14:21 GMT
So more non-peer-reviewed tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy nonesense. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 7, 2024 21:25:27 GMT
So more non-peer-reviewed tinfoil-hat wearing conspiracy nonesense. You are just aping. |
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 9, 2024 4:32:28 GMT
Some critics here are living in a world where they think Science and scientists are free to research what they want … go down any rabbit hole they want, get funding to explore the cutting edge of technology and make devices that tap into FREE ENERGY and ANTI-Gravity … Sadly the World is based around greed and economics … and Science, scientists and their Peer-reviewers have to conform …
Like us, they have to survive the CENSORSHIP we have in this field … conditions which dogged Tesla and others mentioned towards the very end of the Mark McCandlish piece I dropped.
Sadly, some brilliant scientists who made incredible leaps forward in this field … were suppressed, had their devices removed … and they and their ingenuity disappeared into the Ether … premature deaths and accidents/‘suicides’ have dogged this ENERGY field … a symptom of the covert Rogue State that bullies our World.
++++++++++++++++
So Vinny … and ProVeritas … still no sign of your Hawking equation ‘translation’ I asked for? … oh … and ProVeritas …are you any closer to establishing the REALITY of TIME? … I gave you an answer to your assertion the Universe wouldn’t exist if it wasn’t for Time … I did contest that … and it is important if you still want to push this General Relativity thing building atomic clocks that are basically just super sensitive gravity field measuring devices.
These devices prove gravity can be measured and has physicality … is a valid Force/phenomena in our physical Universe … but sadly doesn’t prove Time exists or has similar properties.🤔
Can we explore what Gravity is … without Time being part of that equation?
+++++++++++++++++
P.S. The reasoning why anti-gravity travellers are immune from radiations … is briefly simply explained in the Mark McCandlish video dropped on P.10 … the 1hr 32 min mark onwards. … Being cocooned within a gravity field bubble is the ultimate in shielding … because every particle will carry some charge that can be deflected around the ‘field’ enveloping the outer skin.
Scientists working for Black Ops seem to have discovered that certain frequency waves can penetrate this force field, affect the steerage of these craft … causing them to crash … as witnesses claim happened at Roswell. …
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 9, 2024 4:59:42 GMT
Here is an example where the complex polarity switch in a storm cloud is thrown … and all the heavy ice drops out of the cloud in one co-ordinated mass … in an instant of a few minutes.
Not the largest/heaviest ice lumps we’ve seen … but … arguably a fair example of rapid anti-gravity failure?
… or you can roll with just the official convection change explanation given at the end … ??
|
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Jun 9, 2024 5:17:12 GMT
Were deaths/injuries from ‘divine heavenly’ hailstones the inspiration for Religious Authority to use ‘stoning’ as a form of ‘Judgement’ … the wrath of the Gods?
P.S. Not an anti-gravity polarity (+/- electron/positron) switching event! 😋
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Jun 9, 2024 7:06:11 GMT
You haven't provided any scientific information, and now you're posting Monty Python!
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Jun 9, 2024 10:24:55 GMT
You haven't provided any scientific information, and now you're posting Monty Python! Probably think it is "real history" hidden by the "deep state", just like he think Star Trek and the X-Files are "real science" hidden by the "deep state". All The Best |
|
