|
Post by ProVeritas on May 27, 2024 18:09:36 GMT
No, but you did get an education and healthcare, policing and roads etc etc. Pacifico's point is that on average if you earn less than 50k a year then you receive more from the state than you pay in. Of course its bollox some people who earn well over 50k a year will get huge amounts of health care far in excess of what they paid in, and some people earning less than 40k will hardly need help at all. The idea is a safety net. You achieve nothing by taking extreme examples - you have to look at the average. No, that is a "one size fits all" approach, and the Tories routinely rinsed Labour for trying that. You HAVE to account for the people at the extremes, because that is where the most good, or harm, can be caused. If the small percentage on the exact average are not being harmed, but the much larger group of people away from that average are then you ARE causing harm, no matter what the average says. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on May 27, 2024 18:21:08 GMT
Only in the minds of the fixed and over opinionated that follow Tory propaganda. Thanks for yet another insightful post, this forum would be lost without you.
|
|