|
Post by andrewbrown on May 13, 2024 21:27:14 GMT
So it was OK for Hamas to kill and rape in Israel because some Israelis support the oppression of Palestinians? 🤔 How did that work out for them? That's not really the point, is it? Either targeting civilians is OK or not. I don't think it is. Others may disagree, but if they disagree they have to accept it on both sides.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2024 21:32:57 GMT
How did that work out for them? That's not really the point, is it? Either targeting civilians is OK or not. I don't think it is. Others may disagree, but if they disagree they have to accept it on both sides. Name a conflict when civilians were not targeted.
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 13, 2024 21:41:58 GMT
That's not really the point, is it? Either targeting civilians is OK or not. I don't think it is. Others may disagree, but if they disagree they have to accept it on both sides. Name a conflict when civilians were not targeted. The Afghan war think Cilivian fatalities was very low
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2024 21:50:16 GMT
Name a conflict when civilians were not targeted. The Afghan war think Cilivian fatalities was very low Compared to the Taliban around the same number of civilians were killed - is that what you mean as low? Of course in Iraq after Blairs invasion 3 times as many civilians were killed compared to insurgents - so perhaps Afghanistan was fairly low.
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on May 13, 2024 21:56:19 GMT
Name a conflict where SO MANY civilians have been killed in modern times ?
NATO did not kill as many civilians or destroy as many homes / buildings in the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict.
In thirteen months of bombing by NATO, around 500 civilians were killed in Kosovo, yet in less than 7 moths of bombing in Gaza, the number of civilians killes runs into many thousands. The number of children killed runs into thousands.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on May 13, 2024 22:05:57 GMT
Name a conflict where SO MANY civilians have been killed in modern times ?
NATO did not kill as many civilians or destroy as many homes / buildings in the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict. In thirteen months of bombing by NATO, around 500 civilians were killed in Kosovo, yet in less than 7 moths of bombing in Gaza, the number of civilians killes runs into many thousands. The number of children killed runs into thousands. Iraq - 200,000 killed Afghanistan - 175,000 killed Both in regions with much lower population densities (rather like the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict.)
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 13, 2024 22:12:09 GMT
The Afghan war think Cilivian fatalities was very low Compared to the Taliban around the same number of civilians were killed - is that what you mean as low? Of course in Iraq after Blairs invasion 3 times as many civilians were killed compared to insurgents - so perhaps Afghanistan was fairly low. After how many compared to a few months
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 13, 2024 22:20:34 GMT
Name a conflict where SO MANY civilians have been killed in modern times ?
NATO did not kill as many civilians or destroy as many homes / buildings in the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict. In thirteen months of bombing by NATO, around 500 civilians were killed in Kosovo, yet in less than 7 moths of bombing in Gaza, the number of civilians killes runs into many thousands. The number of children killed runs into thousands. Iraq - 200,000 killed Afghanistan - 175,000 killed Both in regions with much lower population densities (rather like the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict.) Of course there other factors in your half truth . have died from direct war related violence caused by the U.S., its allies, the Iraqi military and police, and opposition forces from the time of the invasion through March 2023. The violent deaths of Iraqi civilians have occurred through aerial bombing, shelling, gunshots, suicide attacks, and fires started by bombing.
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on May 13, 2024 22:37:25 GMT
That's not really the point, is it? Either targeting civilians is OK or not. I don't think it is. Others may disagree, but if they disagree they have to accept it on both sides. Name a conflict when civilians were not targeted. So was it OK for Hamas to target civilians?
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 13, 2024 22:43:20 GMT
Name a conflict when civilians were not targeted. So was it OK for Hamas to target civilians? Only a total prick would ask such a question.....
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 1:27:50 GMT
So was it OK for Hamas to target civilians? Only a total prick would ask such a question..... Andrew saying if it's a result of war Civillians are killed surly it works both ways . Anyone with more than a inch of a Brain can work that out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 14, 2024 2:02:14 GMT
Name a conflict where SO MANY civilians have been killed in modern times ?
NATO did not kill as many civilians or destroy as many homes / buildings in the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict. In thirteen months of bombing by NATO, around 500 civilians were killed in Kosovo, yet in less than 7 moths of bombing in Gaza, the number of civilians killes runs into many thousands. The number of children killed runs into thousands. Iraq - 200,000 killed Afghanistan - 175,000 killed Both in regions with much lower population densities (rather like the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict.) How quickly they conveniently forget. Not to mentioned how Labour destablised the region which led to the rise of groups like ISIS. Blair carries the blood to this day and he tutors Starmer.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on May 14, 2024 2:42:03 GMT
Only a total prick would ask such a question..... Andrew saying if it's a result of war Civillians are killed surly it works both ways . Anyone with more than a inch of a Brain can work that out. Why don't you ask that warmogering arsehole called blair lefty old bean. You and andy support the frigging murdering arsehole at every opportunity,
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 3:00:17 GMT
Andrew saying if it's a result of war Civillians are killed surly it works both ways . Anyone with more than a inch of a Brain can work that out. Why don't you ask that warmogering arsehole called blair lefty old bean. You and andy support the frigging murdering arsehole at every opportunity, OK pal xxxxx
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on May 14, 2024 3:03:06 GMT
Iraq - 200,000 killed Afghanistan - 175,000 killed Both in regions with much lower population densities (rather like the Serbian / Kosovo / Bosnia conflict.) How quickly they conveniently forget. Not to mentioned how Labour destablised the region which led to the rise of groups like ISIS. Blair carries the blood to this day and he tutors Starmer. How long have we got to put up with this Islamic Terrorist Apologists on this board .
|
|