Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2024 16:27:09 GMT
And the same source and article states that the UK have well over a million mossies.....BVL They have friends of Pakistan, friends of India, friends of Palestine etc etc. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 27, 2024 19:31:00 GMT
You don't get that much political honesty in many posts on this board. WELL DONE! Now you've endorsed it, we know it's a load of nonsense. Same old Tory denigration ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 27, 2024 19:55:03 GMT
Traditional conservativism was about family , Christian values, self support and love of the our country . It wasn’t about shafting the workers . Labour and Tories do this shamelessly. The truth is that all these values have been rinsed out of society by lefties that have infected the fabric of society. The current Tory leaders have no idea what conservative values are so they latch on to any idea or concept that they think can pass as conservative. Richi thinks stopping the boats is a ‘ conservative ‘ idea . It’s not. A society with conservative values that would put its own first and insist that people from outside the UK adopt the UKs conservatives values is a conservative society. That society would be alien enough to immigrants with a parasitic intent ( cultural,or economic) as to dissuade them from coming. There us a difference . 1. That's what the Tories say. And some people believe them. 2. Making the rich richer at the expense of the rest has ALWAYS been the Tory's main concern, never more clearly exposed than by Thatcher's period in office. "The combined fortune of billionaires has increased by a staggering $2.7 billion (£2 billion) a day. This comes on top of a decade of historic gains – both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years. 3. Nonsense, Tory governments have dominated parliament. 4. The Tories don't seem to know anything any more. 5. No comment. 6. Ditto. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 27, 2024 20:01:23 GMT
The camoron. Who didn't have the balls to stay after his defeat over the referendum....And the "situation we are now in" can be laid at his and the other UK traitors front doors.
Leaving European Convention on Human Rights ‘not necessary,’ Camoron says.....
Leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is not “necessary” to prevent small boat crossings, Lord David Camoron has said amid Tory divisions over the UK’s membership of the treaty.
But the Foreign Secretary appeared to concede that a returns agreement with France to break up people-smuggling gangs is “simply not possible” because of “the situation we’re in”.
The situation the country is now in can only be laid on the front doors of those who were misled into voting for Brexit, and the Conservative governments that have misled and mishandled matters since the referendum. But not Blair's Nu-Lab who turned the key that permitted open-door immigration? There's a - totally hypocritical - shock. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 27, 2024 20:09:51 GMT
Traditional conservativism was about family , Christian values, self support and love of the our country . It wasn’t about shafting the workers . Labour and Tories do this shamelessly. The truth is that all these values have been rinsed out of society by lefties that have infected the fabric of society. The current Tory leaders have no idea what conservative values are so they latch on to any idea or concept that they think can pass as conservative. Richi thinks stopping the boats is a ‘ conservative ‘ idea . It’s not. A society with conservative values that would put its own first and insist that people from outside the UK adopt the UKs conservatives values is a conservative society. That society would be alien enough to immigrants with a parasitic intent ( cultural,or economic) as to dissuade them from coming. There us a difference . 1. That's what the Tories say. And some people believe them. 2. Making the rich richer at the expense of the rest has ALWAYS been the Tory's main concern, never more clearly exposed than by Thatcher's period in office. "The combined fortune of billionaires has increased by a staggering $2.7 billion (£2 billion) a day. This comes on top of a decade of historic gains – both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years. 3. Nonsense, Tory governments have dominated parliament. 4. The Tories don't seem to know anything any more. 5. No comment. 6. Ditto. I deliberately used a lower case when using the word conservative . You don’t know the difference between that and Tory politicians . Why am I not surprised? The rest is waffle . |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 27, 2024 20:16:58 GMT
The problem is that this poster’s view of Nu Labour is similar to another posters view of China .
They both idolise a political group to the point that they are incapable of having a single objective thought about them
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 27, 2024 22:16:45 GMT
Traditional conservativism was about family , Christian values, self support and love of the our country . It wasn’t about shafting the workers . Labour and Tories do this shamelessly. The truth is that all these values have been rinsed out of society by lefties that have infected the fabric of society. The current Tory leaders have no idea what conservative values are so they latch on to any idea or concept that they think can pass as conservative. Richi thinks stopping the boats is a ‘ conservative ‘ idea . It’s not. A society with conservative values that would put its own first and insist that people from outside the UK adopt the UKs conservatives values is a conservative society. That society would be alien enough to immigrants with a parasitic intent ( cultural,or economic) as to dissuade them from coming. There us a difference . 1. That's what the Tories say. And some people believe them. 2. Making the rich richer at the expense of the rest has ALWAYS been the Tory's main concern, never more clearly exposed than by Thatcher's period in office. "The combined fortune of billionaires has increased by a staggering $2.7 billion (£2 billion) a day. This comes on top of a decade of historic gains – both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years. 3. Nonsense, Tory governments have dominated parliament. 4. The Tories don't seem to know anything any more. 5. No comment. 6. Ditto. Of course the rich got a lot richer than the poor got slightly better off under New Labour - proving that Blair was a Thatcher-Lite Tory. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Apr 28, 2024 13:24:27 GMT
And the same source and article states that the UK have well over a million mossies.....BVL You really are blind. Those quotes I gave you
one quarter of the Parliamentary Labour Party and one third of the Shadow Cabinet.
80% of Conservative MPs were members of the CFI
0.5% of the overall population
have nothing to do with muslims. It should be obvious the democratic system is fucked. How can 0.5% of the population be represented by 80% of Cons and 25% of Labour, of which 33% are in the shadow cabinet? There is something really wrong here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Apr 28, 2024 13:25:54 GMT
And the same source and article states that the UK have well over a million mossies.....BVL They have friends of Pakistan, friends of India, friends of Palestine etc etc. Can we speak quantitatively please. How many? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 28, 2024 13:39:43 GMT
They have friends of Pakistan, friends of India, friends of Palestine etc etc. Can we speak quantitatively please. How many? Too fucking many BVL... |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Apr 28, 2024 14:09:05 GMT
Can we speak quantitatively please. How many? Too fucking many BVL... You realise it was the Jews who started this whole equality shit in the first place cos they were discriminated agaisnt in Germany. You have to ask why they pissed the Germans off so much. Perhaps they tried the same shit on them but being Germans they were a bit less forgiving. The first proponent of LGBT was a Jewish professor working in Nazi Germany. What a coincidence that we are all being forced into being trans now, after being forced into being gay and lesbian. Respects to Thatcher for Section 28. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 28, 2024 14:40:46 GMT
You realise it was the Jews who started this whole equality shit in the first place cos they were discriminated agaisnt in Germany. You have to ask why they pissed the Germans off so much. Perhaps they tried the same shit on them but being Germans they were a bit less forgiving. The first proponent of LGBT was a Jewish professor working in Nazi Germany. What a coincidence that we are all being forced into being trans now, after being forced into being gay and lesbian. Respects to Thatcher for Section 28. What a load of bollocks. NO ONE is forcing you to be trans, gay or lesbian. Just have the spine to own it, no one really cares what floats your boat. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 28, 2024 14:50:06 GMT
1. That's what the Tories say. And some people believe them. 2. Making the rich richer at the expense of the rest has ALWAYS been the Tory's main concern, never more clearly exposed than by Thatcher's period in office. "The combined fortune of billionaires has increased by a staggering $2.7 billion (£2 billion) a day. This comes on top of a decade of historic gains – both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years. 3. Nonsense, Tory governments have dominated parliament. 4. The Tories don't seem to know anything any more. 5. No comment. 6. Ditto. Of course the rich got a lot richer than the poor got slightly better off under New Labour - proving that Blair was a Thatcher-Lite Tory. All The Best A government that was working "for the many, not the few" was bound to have some bluish areas, but definitely nothing resembling Thatcher's extremist blue areas, in fact they had to repair large areas of Thatcher's damage. The enrichment I referred to included the information that -- "both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years." -- the same period of time when most people were struggling financially. You have a very selective anti-New Labour memory. NL did miss their reduction target in child poverty BUT when NL left office in 2010 children living in (relative) poverty were still fewer than when NL came to office in 1997, and that was despite the international financial meltdown of 2008. Your anti-NL assessment says so much more about yourself than New Labour's period in office or about your sense of fairness or objectivity. Edit. I note you ignored this bit of relevant information from your website. " When Labour came to power in 1997, income inequality stood at historically high levels, and relative income poverty had risen substantially since the party was last in office in the late 1970s." That's Thatcherism. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 28, 2024 15:07:31 GMT
You realise it was the Jews who started this whole equality shit in the first place cos they were discriminated agaisnt in Germany. You have to ask why they pissed the Germans off so much. Perhaps they tried the same shit on them but being Germans they were a bit less forgiving. The first proponent of LGBT was a Jewish professor working in Nazi Germany. What a coincidence that we are all being forced into being trans now, after being forced into being gay and lesbian. Respects to Thatcher for Section 28. Who is holding a gun to your head BVL? How we live is a choice not a fucking order.. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 28, 2024 15:11:46 GMT
Of course the rich got a lot richer than the poor got slightly better off under New Labour - proving that Blair was a Thatcher-Lite Tory. All The Best A government that was working "for the many, not the few" was bound to have some bluish areas, but definitely nothing resembling Thatcher's extremist blue areas, in fact they had to repair large areas of Thatcher's damage. The enrichment I referred to included the information that -- "both the number and wealth of billionaires having doubled over the last ten years." -- the same period of time when most people were struggling financially. You have a very selective anti-New Labour memory. NL did miss their reduction target in child poverty BUT when NL left office in 2010 children living in (relative) poverty were still fewer than when NL came to office in 1997, and that was despite the international financial meltdown of 2008. Your anti-NL assessment says so much more about yourself than New Labour's period in office or about your sense of fairness or objectivity. Edit. I note you ignored this bit of relevant information from your website. " When Labour came to power in 1997, income inequality stood at historically high levels, and relative income poverty had risen substantially since the party was last in office in the late 1970s." That's Thatcherism. I read it all, including the bit that said that even from starting with those historically high levels of Income Inequality that most measures of income inequality nudged up." That is that under Thatcher-Lite Tory Tony Blair Income Inequality INCREASED for most people. Oh and back to blaming ALL of Nu-Lab's many, many failures on the "2008 IFM" (something you actually lie about not doing) - the one that we were hit harder by than any other G7 or G20 Nation - what a overabundance of cognitive dissonance you have. Oh, and don't forget this: Labour made the rich richer, in fact they increased the wealth of the rich by more than increased the wealth of any other demographic - Blair wasn't out to help the many, he was out to help the few, because he was one of them. All The Best |
|
