|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 4, 2023 19:40:17 GMT
The only thing that I posted from any source was an extract from a Scottish Government publication that you originally posted earlier on this thread.You posted this to support your statement that Scottish Government has underspent every year that it has been in power. I posted back an extract from the self-same Scottish Government publication that you originally posted which, far from supporting your claim about it underspending every year, actually contains a clear and unambiguous statement from Scottish Government that directly contradicts what you claimed ie. it spends every penny it gets (and quite rightly too, in my opinion).
If you still contend that I have posted something from the UK Treasury wankers, please explain what this is.
BTW - I notice that you have switched your line away from claiming that ScotGov underspends every year and are instead now asking me to produce a statement from ScotGov confirming that they have overspent in some years. I take this to be your tacit admission that you were wrong when you claimed that SNP ScotGov always underspends. Further, as you have almost certainly now taken the time to actually read what was in the link that you provided, I am sure that you know that there is no express statement to that effect in the publication that you posted.
However, as I have already explained, if the amount of money that is carried over into a financial year from the previous financial year is more than the the money subsequently transferred over at the end of that financial year into the next, then there has been an overspend in that financial year, with the amount of the overspend being the difference between the amount transferred in at the start of the financial year and the money transferred over at the end of that financial year. From the table in the ScotGov publication, we can see that this has happened so there have been instances of overspend, albeit presumably within the year end mechanisms that UK Treasury allow ScotGov to employ.
Just to be clear, I am not, in any way, criticising ScotGov for this. It is good financial practice and ensures that all monies available can be spent more effectively.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 5, 2023 11:43:21 GMT
The only thing that I posted from any source was an extract from a Scottish Government publication that you originally posted earlier on this thread.You posted this to support your statement that Scottish Government has underspent every year that it has been in power. I posted back an extract from the self-same Scottish Government publication that you originally posted which, far from supporting your claim about it underspending every year, actually contains a clear and unambiguous statement from Scottish Government that directly contradicts what you claimed ie. it spends every penny it gets (and quite rightly too, in my opinion). If you still contend that I have posted something from the UK Treasury wankers, please explain what this is. BTW - I notice that you have switched your line away from claiming that ScotGov underspends every year and are instead now asking me to produce a statement from ScotGov confirming that they have overspent in some years. I take this to be your tacit admission that you were wrong when you claimed that SNP ScotGov always underspends. Further, as you have almost certainly now taken the time to actually read what was in the link that you provided, I am sure that you know that there is no express statement to that effect in the publication that you posted. However, as I have already explained, if the amount of money that is carried over into a financial year from the previous financial year is more than the the money subsequently transferred over at the end of that financial year into the next, then there has been an overspend in that financial year, with the amount of the overspend being the difference between the amount transferred in at the start of the financial year and the money transferred over at the end of that financial year. From the table in the ScotGov publication, we can see that this has happened so there have been instances of overspend, albeit presumably within the year end mechanisms that UK Treasury allow ScotGov to employ. Just to be clear, I am not, in any way, criticising ScotGov for this. It is good financial practice and ensures that all monies available can be spent more effectively. No matey. You posted what I said was wrong. It is not for me to explain what you posted. I said the Scottish Government has underspent every year. That is it. End off. You said that was wrong. So how about you pointing out where in the link you posted to me, I was wrong. If I earn a £100 a week. And I spend £90 of my own money. I have undespent. If I do the same next week I have underspent by £10. Or you give me another name for it. So stop talking nonsense and in riddles rather than just admit you are 100% wrong. Again. And I have not changed anything. It is you who is beginning to go off on tangents . My question has not changed. I repeat. I said the Scottish Government has underspent every year. YOU stated that was not true. That is what YOU said. Then you posted waffle from a Westminster wanker trying to belittle the SNP. That is what you posted from the Westminster wankers. Do not blame me if you forget what you post. Then you supplied a link to prove what that Westminster tosspot said was true. So lets get the ducks in order. . What he was waffling about I will leave you to believe. If you are English or a BritNat. I spend time every time I post listening to the same drivel. I was wrong. So how about you being a first. Correct what I said. Not a problem if I am wrong, I am wrong. You are now being asked. On that link you posted to me, you tell me where the Scottish Government did not underspent. It is not a trick question. I do not need a riddle or more waffle. Just a simple link. And just to be clear. Yes you are trying to criticise the ScotGov. And I bet you have no idea why. And how I reached that conclusion. Read your last sentence. Why not just say. Well done the ScotGov. You showed Westminster how to do it. Which they did. But no. You looked for some ulterior motive. Which matey is simply not there. And you know it. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 5, 2023 12:03:14 GMT
What you said was wrong. You even proved yourself wrong by posting a link to a ScotGov publication that made it clear that you were wrong. I just pointed this out to you but for some reason you don’t appear to have the capacity or the humility to accept that you were wrong even when it is glaringly obvious that this is the case. I can’t help you with that and I don’t have the time or the inclination to indulge your on this either.
I do note, however, that you have just emerged from a series of exchanges with Tinculin where you demonstrated the same behaviour, so I am at least comforted by the knowledge that the problem lies with you, not me.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jan 5, 2023 12:09:36 GMT
Plenty of claims happy but little substantive evidence to back up those empty claims.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 5, 2023 12:13:17 GMT
There is plenty of substantive evidence in the thread above and in the thread containing the recent exchanges between Jaydee and Tinculin.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 5, 2023 13:40:03 GMT
There is plenty of substantive evidence in the thread above and in the thread containing the recent exchanges between Jaydee and Tinculin. Well for the world of me I cannot see it. So perhaps if you are incapable of supplying a link, You could do a copy and paste that states the Scottish Government has not underspent. It is a very simple request. I will repeat what I have already said to others. If you are going to post something about Scotland, Be in a position to back it up. This is the very reason why Unionist party's have been decimated in Scotland. Second. The basic law of politics. When in a hole stop digging. One second you are saying you did not say what you said and the next you claim I am moving the goal posts. I have heard it a million times. And there is not one jot of evidence in any recent exchange to prove I was wrong. Plenty of ego and deluded thinking being destroyed. And Tinculin can speak for himself. On that I have given five links. How about you pointing out where all those 5 links are wrong?. That is a question. You are not going to answer are you, and know it. or admit you are wrong and now waffling to divert. You in the same class at school as OM15. Just for you and to stop you for having to look I have put the 5 links below. Now is that not nice of me. Which part on any of them is wrong www.edudwar.com/richest-countries-in-europe/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_and_social_rankings_of_sovereign_states_in_Europewagecentre.com/immigration/country/the-richest-countries-in-europewww.worlddata.info/richest-countries.phpimmigrantinvest.com/blog/top-10-richest-countries-world-en/ |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Jan 5, 2023 13:44:40 GMT
Don't drag me into it, your aggressive and rather illiterate posts contain 100% nonsense, don't get testy with others about their views until you are able to post a coherent and accurate post that can be understood.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 5, 2023 13:48:36 GMT
Don't drag me into it, your aggressive and rather illiterate posts contain 100% nonsense, don't get testy with others about their views until you are able to post a coherent and accurate post that can be understood. Five links above you. Which part of any of them are wrong. Then do try and use your own advice when you drag me into your stupid nonsense with other posters ranting everything I say is wrong. Looking for brownie points. But correcting nothing. As you have just done again. You missed out drugs and medication |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 5, 2023 13:55:03 GMT
There is plenty of substantive evidence in the thread above and in the thread containing the recent exchanges between Jaydee and Tinculin. Well for the world of me I cannot see it. So perhaps if you are incapable of supplying a link, You could do a copy and paste that states the Scottish Government has not underspent. It is a very simple request. FFS, Jaydee. I have already done that. It is in my first post above on this thread where I responded to your mistaken claim. i also posted the link to the ScotGov publication that the copy and paste was pulled from in that same post. It is the very same ScotGov publication that you posted a link to in your earlier post above when you made your mistaken claim that ScotGov underspends every year. btw - it is you, and you alone, who is attempting to divert, as demonstrated by all but the first 2 lines of your last post to me above. |
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Jan 5, 2023 14:13:04 GMT
Well for the world of me I cannot see it. So perhaps if you are incapable of supplying a link, You could do a copy and paste that states the Scottish Government has not underspent. It is a very simple request. FFS, Jaydee. I have already done that. It is in my first post above on this thread where I responded to your mistaken claim. i also posted the link to the ScotGov publication that the copy and paste was pulled from in that same post. It is the very same ScotGov publication that you posted a link to in your earlier post above when you made your mistaken claim that ScotGov underspends every year. FFS You are just not going to give up. No you have not supplied any thing that states the ScotGov has not underspent. Stating I was wrong. You have supplied a link stating the opposite. It show that every year they have underspent. And neither have you told me in the 5 links I just gave. Exactly how they are wrong. Could I suggest you first understand how the data is collated. And that has nothing to do with Fred earnings a hundred grand a year. Then dispute. However. I have asked you for a link to point out where the ScotGov did not underspent. You have failed spectacularly to supply. I have asked you for a copy and paste to show the same. You have still not supplied. I am now asking you to post the thread number and the time and date where you state you responded. To do that all you have to do. Go to the top right of the post requested. Use the little drop down arrow. Copy and then paste the bit that says link to post. . Bingo. You will finally proved I was wrong. Not a problem. That is now three methods of asking you for a link. I get this nonsense every time I post from the like of OM15 who never corrects anything. All just Jock hating bile. But you can read for yourself. . Never mind he will give you a brownie point. So how about you being a first. Give this link. You are not going to do so, are you. Because it is utter nonsense. And you know it. |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jan 5, 2023 14:21:21 GMT
There is plenty of substantive evidence in the thread above and in the thread containing the recent exchanges between Jaydee and Tinculin. where? link? |
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jan 5, 2023 14:23:30 GMT
Well for the world of me I cannot see it. So perhaps if you are incapable of supplying a link, You could do a copy and paste that states the Scottish Government has not underspent. It is a very simple request. FFS, Jaydee. I have already done that. It is in my first post above on this thread where I responded to your mistaken claim. i also posted the link to the ScotGov publication that the copy and paste was pulled from in that same post. It is the very same ScotGov publication that you posted a link to in your earlier post above when you made your mistaken claim that ScotGov underspends every year. btw - it is you, and you alone, who is attempting to divert, as demonstrated by all but the first 2 lines of your last post to me above. When you cant even acknowledge basic facts like there is no uk law , and dont understand the difference between uk legislators and legisaltion and law of the various countires , then why should we accept vague unsubstatniated nonsense which jaydee ha s picked apart numernous times on various other matters? |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Jan 5, 2023 14:29:49 GMT
I have given you back your own link in which ScotGov say that they spend everything and return nothing. If they spend everything and return nothing then they are not underspending. If that is too challenging a concept for you to get your head around then you have my sympathy. However, what you no longer have right now is my patience. You have stretched to its limit on this one ,I’m afraid. I am going to visit my young grandson as I feel in need of a more sensible conversation than I am having on here with you.
|
|
|
|
Post by thomas on Jan 5, 2023 14:32:04 GMT
...because you claim something doesnt make it so. any idea when we can see this imaginary uk law?
|
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Jan 5, 2023 14:35:44 GMT
The Armed Forces Act 2006 is a UK law passed by Parliament and is law in all parts of the United Kingdom.
|
|
