|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 27, 2024 8:01:11 GMT
Handyman, how have you dealt with these things?.. I was a Police Officer with the Met for 36 years and proud of it been out nearly 24 years thankfully , I thought it was obvious in my posts which will soon stop as we leave the UK early next month, give the Lefties a little time to insult me I could not give a flying feck, I have been insulted and racial abused for years when dealing with the dross in our midst |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 27, 2024 8:29:25 GMT
Handyman, how have you dealt with these things?.. I was a Police Officer with the Met for 36 years and proud of it been out nearly 24 years thankfully , I thought it was obvious in my posts which will soon stop as we leave the UK early next month, give the Lefties a little time to insult me I could not give a flying feck, I have been insulted and racial abused for years when dealing with the dross in our midst Good man, you should quite rightly be proud of your service. As I am of mine. But tbh I tend to think it doesn't matter any more. These days being proud of your past is something lefties sneer at, particularly if you're white and English. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 27, 2024 8:35:39 GMT
I was a Police Officer with the Met for 36 years and proud of it been out nearly 24 years thankfully , I thought it was obvious in my posts which will soon stop as we leave the UK early next month, give the Lefties a little time to insult me I could not give a flying feck, I have been insulted and racial abused for years when dealing with the dross in our midst Good man, you should quite rightly be proud of your service. As I am of mine. But tbh I tend to think it doesn't matter any more. These days being proud of your past is something lefties sneer at, particularly if you're white and English. Thank You, and you are quite right to be proud of your service to the country putting yourself in harms way a nephew of mine saw active service in the Falklands I am proud of him, as I am with other members of my family who fought in two world wars and one again later in Korea, some I never met . |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 27, 2024 12:03:24 GMT
I think your authoritarian trait is showing. If punishment alone was the answer then surely the prisons would soon be empty? See2, first and foremost prison is designed to be a punishment. No one goes to prison for good behaviour. When in prison if some form of rehabilitation is offered all well and good, but make no mistake the primary function of prison is to deny liberty to people who cannot live within the rules set down by civilised society. And may I remind you, civilised society demands it. You ask; if punishment alone was the answer then surely the prisons would soon be empty? Have a look at prisons from the 1950's and 60's. They were grim austere places in which prisoners did not wish to visit twice. Today the biggest problem within the penal system is recidivism, and that is because criminals no longer fear going to prison. The quickest way to decrease the prison population is to make prison a place no one wants to visit twice. And in saying that I'm certainly not advocating physical abuse. I'm talking about a strict no frills regime in an austere environment. A prison. 1. Being locked up is punishment. so no contradiction there. Some form of rehabilitation SHOULD be available both directly and indirectly. I would remind you that often the problem begins with societies treatment of many families, in the areas of education and employment. 2. That is your personal interpretation. If prison no longer works then perhaps prison is even an escape route from the life some have been channeled into when living outside of prison. Apparently a high number of those in prison are very poorly educated. Which is a problem that should have been solved during their early childhood. Cruelty inflicted upon individuals can drive some to crime. 3. in many cases doubling down on the awfulness of prisons would be to double down on those who suffer the most from the cruelty and the injustices of society. In which case the choice would be improve society or knock shit out of the losers. I suspect I know which you and which those who support your posts would prefer. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 27, 2024 12:12:42 GMT
Handyman, how have you dealt with these things?.. I was a Police Officer with the Met for 36 years and proud of it been out nearly 24 years thankfully , I thought it was obvious in my posts which will soon stop as we leave the UK early next month, give the Lefties a little time to insult me I could not give a flying feck, I have been insulted and racial abused for years when dealing with the dross in our midst "When dealing with the dross in our midst." You were clearly never fit to be a Policeman especially as you seemed to think you were was both judge and jury. A street cleaner maybe. If you are leaving the country that sounds like a plus for the UK. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 27, 2024 15:57:37 GMT
1. Being locked up is punishment. so no contradiction there. Some form of rehabilitation SHOULD be available both directly and indirectly. I would remind you that often the problem begins with societies treatment of many families, in the areas of education and employment. 2. That is your personal interpretation. If prison no longer works then perhaps prison is even an escape route from the life some have been channeled into when living outside of prison. Apparently a high number of those in prison are very poorly educated. Which is a problem that should have been solved during their early childhood. Cruelty inflicted upon individuals can drive some to crime. 3. in many cases doubling down on the awfulness of prisons would be to double down on those who suffer the most from the cruelty and the injustices of society. In which case the choice would be improve society or knock shit out of the losers. I suspect I know which you and which those who support your posts would prefer. Prison is designed to deny a felon his liberty and as such it is impossible for prison not to work. As for the rest of your comments, see my previous. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 27, 2024 16:15:30 GMT
See2, first and foremost prison is designed to be a punishment. No one goes to prison for good behaviour. When in prison if some form of rehabilitation is offered all well and good, but make no mistake the primary function of prison is to deny liberty to people who cannot live within the rules set down by civilised society. And may I remind you, civilised society demands it. You ask; if punishment alone was the answer then surely the prisons would soon be empty? Have a look at prisons from the 1950's and 60's. They were grim austere places in which prisoners did not wish to visit twice. Today the biggest problem within the penal system is recidivism, and that is because criminals no longer fear going to prison. The quickest way to decrease the prison population is to make prison a place no one wants to visit twice. And in saying that I'm certainly not advocating physical abuse. I'm talking about a strict no frills regime in an austere environment. A prison. 1. Being locked up is punishment. so no contradiction there. Some form of rehabilitation SHOULD be available both directly and indirectly. I would remind you that often the problem begins with societies treatment of many families, in the areas of education and employment. 2. That is your personal interpretation. If prison no longer works then perhaps prison is even an escape route from the life some have been channeled into when living outside of prison. Apparently a high number of those in prison are very poorly educated. Which is a problem that should have been solved during their early childhood. Cruelty inflicted upon individuals can drive some to crime. 3. in many cases doubling down on the awfulness of prisons would be to double down on those who suffer the most from the cruelty and the injustices of society. In which case the choice would be improve society or knock shit out of the losers. I suspect I know which you and which those who support your posts would prefer. Another stat which you would find interesting is that if you take the group of repeat offenders, like what we call a professional criminal who has hundreds of burglaries to his name say, you will find a very high number were brought up in government care. They probably don't even know who their real mother and father is. They might have been taken into care for some rather trivial reason to do with the parents and agaisnt the family's will as well.
There is big money in this care game. The tax payer can fork out big money for each year a child is in care and the costs are many times the salary the parents could earn on min wage. A lot of our economy is parasitic in nature. You have the genuine producers of wealth, but then there is a whole ecosystem of parasites that suck from that wealth and either don't give anything in return, or like a lot of parasites in nature, they damage the host organism they live off. A lot of parasites are sophisticated and have degrees. They join a profession which teaches them the art of parasitic feeding.Diagnosing people with a condition which requires care is a favourite ruse.
|
|
