|
Post by sandypine on Mar 19, 2024 11:30:32 GMT
Because perish the thought that alternative opinions might be heard.π With just a minimum of depth of thought you would understand that my approach is against the indoctrination of people moving them further to the right of politics. i.e. closer to the dangers of Right-wing extremism. And there are those who are against the indoctrination of the people moving them more to the dangers of a Socialist state. These are all opinions. On a personal level I found I could not watch the BBC news as the bias was ever more noticeable, Sky was slightly better but still tended to be with the narrative. Now you may disagree, as I am sure you do, but democracy requires the airing of all views for dissemination and discussion and no one has the right to decide what should or should not be heard within the confines of the existing laws.
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Mar 19, 2024 11:57:11 GMT
GB news will be like Trump, the deep state are out to get Trump, now GB news are on the list. If you deviate from proscibed dogma, your history.
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 19, 2024 12:25:30 GMT
GB News ensures that all guests from the left are treated with respect and courtesy, Sir Jacob Rees Mogg has many people on his show from Stop Oil, leftie councils, leftie universities and they are all given an opportunity to put forward their views without being shouted down. Yes they do do that much but it isn't enough. Lefty bullshit is not the news. They are so obsessed with their political arguments that the listener is short-changed.
You got people walking away thinking, I heard about this woke crap every day. Tell me something new.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 14:08:39 GMT
GB news will be like Trump, the deep state are out to get Trump, now GB news are on the list. If you deviate from proscibed dogma, your history. The dogma being the deep-state is out to get Trump? The ONLY person responsible for Trump being mired in court cases is Trump. He breaks the law. He commits Rape / Sexual Assault. He lies in official documents about the financial health of his companies. No one bats an eye-lid. The moment someone decides to hold the serial criminal to account people start screaming "deep-state witch-hunt"? What a crock of shit. He deserves those court cases. He deserves to be held accountable. He deserves to loose assets if he refuses to stump up $400 Million despite him alleging he is worth multi $billions. Likewise BG News deserve to be held accountable when the break the rules that govern their industry. It really is not rocket science, is it? All The Best
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Mar 19, 2024 14:21:28 GMT
GB news will be like Trump, the deep state are out to get Trump, now GB news are on the list. If you deviate from proscibed dogma, your history. Then again if the authorities try to close this down, we only need someone like Farage to set up a petition to take away public funding from the BBC as a backlash and it might go over 10m. Then watch the meltdown begin.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 19, 2024 14:27:02 GMT
GB news will be like Trump, the deep state are out to get Trump, now GB news are on the list. If you deviate from proscibed dogma, your history. The dogma being the deep-state is out to get Trump? The ONLY person responsible for Trump being mired in court cases is Trump. He breaks the law. He commits Rape / Sexual Assault.He lies in official documents about the financial health of his companies. No one bats an eye-lid. The moment someone decides to hold the serial criminal to account people start screaming "deep-state witch-hunt"? What a crock of shit. He deserves those court cases. He deserves to be held accountable. He deserves to loose assets if he refuses to stump up $400 Million despite him alleging he is worth multi $billions. Likewise BG News deserve to be held accountable when the break the rules that govern their industry. It really is not rocket science, is it? All The Best Think you need to be careful what you say.
Has Trump ever been tried and convicted of any such offense?
On the other hand Bill Clinton "Lewinsky said she had sexual encounters with Bill Clinton on nine occasions from November 1995 to March 1997. According to her published schedule, First Lady Hillary Clinton was at the White House for at least some portion of seven of those days".
Juanita Broaddrick Main article: Juanita Broaddrick Β§ Allegations against Bill Clinton
In a 1999 episode of Dateline NBC, former Bill Clinton campaign volunteer Juanita Broaddrick alleged that, in the late 1970s, Clinton raped her in her hotel room. According to Broaddrick, she agreed to meet with Clinton for coffee in the lobby of her hotel, but Clinton asked if they could go to her room to avoid a crowd of reporters; she agreed. Broaddrick stated that once Clinton had isolated her in her hotel room, he raped her. Broaddrick stated Clinton injured her lip by biting it during the assault. In 1999, Clinton denied Broaddrick's allegations through his lawyer.
Any comment Pro?
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 14:29:28 GMT
The dogma being the deep-state is out to get Trump? The ONLY person responsible for Trump being mired in court cases is Trump. He breaks the law. He commits Rape / Sexual Assault.He lies in official documents about the financial health of his companies. No one bats an eye-lid. The moment someone decides to hold the serial criminal to account people start screaming "deep-state witch-hunt"? What a crock of shit. He deserves those court cases. He deserves to be held accountable. He deserves to loose assets if he refuses to stump up $400 Million despite him alleging he is worth multi $billions. Likewise BG News deserve to be held accountable when the break the rules that govern their industry. It really is not rocket science, is it? All The Best Think you need to be careful what you say.
Has Trump ever been tried and convicted of any such offense? Yes, he has: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump, at least Sexual Assault. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 19, 2024 14:32:11 GMT
Difference being they are not 'criminal courts', I said tried and convicted.
What's your thoughts on Bill Clinton BTW.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 20:22:55 GMT
Difference being they are not 'criminal courts', I said tried and convicted.
What's your thoughts on Bill Clinton BTW.
Not going to engage with someone trying to use whataboutery to deflect from Trump's wrongdoing. Trump's wrongdoing stands on its own as being totally wrong... ...end of. You chose Clinton because he is of the opposite party, trying to turn wrong-doing into a party-political points game. So "whatabout" this: Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments: Trump (Republican) β 215 Nixon (Republican) β 76 Reagan (Republican) β 26 Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments: Obama (Democrat) β 0 Carter (Democrat) β 1 Clinton (Democrat) β 2 Spot the pattern yet? All The Best
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 20:23:54 GMT
Difference being they are not 'criminal courts', I said tried and convicted.
What's your thoughts on Bill Clinton BTW.
Ok, being found guilty of sexual assault in a civil court is acceptable now? Since when? All The Best
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 19, 2024 22:22:53 GMT
Difference being they are not 'criminal courts', I said tried and convicted.
What's your thoughts on Bill Clinton BTW.
Ok, being found guilty of sexual assault in a civil court is acceptable now? Since when? All The Best A Civil Court doesn't mean you actually did anything - it does not require evidence of guilt.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 19, 2024 22:38:14 GMT
Difference being they are not 'criminal courts', I said tried and convicted.
What's your thoughts on Bill Clinton BTW.
Not going to engage with someone trying to use whataboutery to deflect from Trump's wrongdoing. Trump's wrongdoing stands on its own as being totally wrong... ...end of. You chose Clinton because he is of the opposite party, trying to turn wrong-doing into a party-political points game. So "whatabout" this: Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments: Trump (Republican) β 215 Nixon (Republican) β 76 Reagan (Republican) β 26 Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments: Obama (Democrat) β 0 Carter (Democrat) β 1 Clinton (Democrat) β 2 Spot the pattern yet? All The Best Irrelevant. Trump will in all probability be the next president.
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 20, 2024 1:42:46 GMT
Ok, being found guilty of sexual assault in a civil court is acceptable now? Since when? All The Best A Civil Court doesn't mean you actually did anything - it does not require evidence of guilt. So he got fined all that money for doing nothing? Never read anything so stupid in all my life. All The Best
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 20, 2024 5:11:50 GMT
Not going to engage with someone trying to use whataboutery to deflect from Trump's wrongdoing. Trump's wrongdoing stands on its own as being totally wrong... ...end of. You chose Clinton because he is of the opposite party, trying to turn wrong-doing into a party-political points game. So "whatabout" this: Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments: Trump (Republican) β 215 Nixon (Republican) β 76 Reagan (Republican) β 26 Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments: Obama (Democrat) β 0 Carter (Democrat) β 1 Clinton (Democrat) β 2 Spot the pattern yet? All The Best Irrelevant. Trump will in all probability be the next president. There was a list published somewhere that showed that many of the people who backed him, some of whom worked for him last time out, have stated they will not vote for him at the next election. The next election could be quite interesting. I wonder, if he loses will he claim 'they stole the election'?
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet on Mar 20, 2024 7:22:31 GMT
It is absolutely appalling that GB News should have MP's as presenters - what on earth were they thinking?.. They aren't news readers, they are talkshow hosts. LBC has also had Tory MP presenters.
|
|