|
|
Post by wapentake on Mar 19, 2024 10:19:51 GMT
This is nothing more than left wing envy particularly from the BBC and Sky who are jealous of GB News success. If you have a look at GB News presenters just two are MP's one of whom is a Tory, and that's what really annoys small minded bitter lefties. I suspect attacking a Right-wing news outlet is just a case of people defending the country from Right-Wing extremism. Right wing extremism is, just like Left-wing extremism, out on the extremes of political thinking, these positions are, again IMO, held by individuals who allow their feelings to dominate their logical mind, thus producing illogical thoughts. Well if you’re not why were you saying just a few posts back that the fact it had financial difficulties were and I quote Just asking. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 19, 2024 10:23:56 GMT
If you, or any other outraged lefty actually watched GB News you would quickly realise that it's far from a right wing extremist channel, but this is what the BBC want lefties to think. I am not an "outraged lefty" so If you want a debate do not start with your typical Rightist DNA style denigrating approach. Get real or STFU. Mmmm I see, so to recap: you may throw insults at me, but I may not reciprocate. Well you're certainly showing all the symptoms of being an outraged lefty. |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Mar 19, 2024 10:28:12 GMT
What nonsense. There is no right wing extremism, unless you feel that wanting schoolchildren to grow up naturally and be educated properly, wanting adequate defence and wanting people to spend their earnings as they please is extremism. I think that you have been watching the BBC too much, or else reading the Guardian, both of which are making money out of selling rubbish to people like you.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 19, 2024 10:29:16 GMT
I am not an "outraged lefty" so If you want a debate do not start with your typical Rightist DNA style denigrating approach. Get real or STFU. Mmmm I see, so to recap: you may throw insults at me, but I may not reciprocate. Well you're certainly showing all the symptoms of being an outraged lefty. Your problem is that my so called insults just point out your reality, your insults are just insults that expose your reality. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 19, 2024 10:34:35 GMT
Who will pay for their crap if they are not in power? GB news is losing mega amounts of cash. If that is true, its the best news I have heard for some time. Because perish the thought that alternative opinions might be heard.🙄 |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 19, 2024 10:34:59 GMT
What nonsense. There is no right wing extremism, unless you feel that wanting schoolchildren to grow up naturally and be educated properly, wanting adequate defence and wanting people to spend their earnings as they please is extremism. I think that you have been watching the BBC too much, or else reading the Guardian, both of which are making money out of selling rubbish to people like you. I know from your previous rubbishy posts that you are a Righty, I therefore expect you to blindly defend Rightist outlets, suggesting scenarios that don't even exist, without even understand that you are doing just that. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Mar 19, 2024 10:36:11 GMT
This is nothing more than left wing envy particularly from the BBC and Sky who are jealous of GB News success. If you have a look at GB News presenters just two are MP's one of whom is a Tory, and that's what really annoys small minded bitter lefties. How do you classify costing (losing) over £40 million year a success? Are you quoting from its largely willing print acquisition target, the Telegraph? Commercially, GBN is a cash sink hole that’ll likely eventually need help from outside… |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 19, 2024 10:38:28 GMT
If that is true, its the best news I have heard for some time. Because perish the thought that alternative opinions might be heard.🙄 With just a minimum of depth of thought you would understand that my approach is against the indoctrination of people moving them further to the right of politics. i.e. closer to the dangers of Right-wing extremism. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 19, 2024 10:42:35 GMT
Because perish the thought that alternative opinions might be heard.🙄 With just a minimum of depth of thought you would understand that my approach is against the indoctrination of people moving them further to the right of politics. i.e. closer to the dangers of Right-wing extremism. I think we should be worried about the Far-left wing extremism, when MPs have to have armed guards because the far-left are threatening to murder them. |
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Mar 19, 2024 10:54:42 GMT
Did you attend the same school as Diane Abbott?
|
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 10:55:16 GMT
Well, he was de-banked because his account no longer met the requirements for the type of account he held with Coutts. Yes, NatWest were very shoddy in how they handled the publicity of it all, but closing down an account that no longer meets the requirements for that account is hardly de-banking, it is good house-keeping. All The Best Absolute rubbish. If Farage had been de-banked by Coutts/NatWest because he no longer met the banks criteria for holding an account, then NatWest Chief Exec Dame Alison Rose and Coutts CEO Peter Flavell would not have lost their jobs. IIRC, they lost their jobs for how they allowed private information into the public domain, NOT for closing an account that no longer met the requirements. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 19, 2024 11:05:37 GMT
This is nothing more than left wing envy particularly from the BBC and Sky who are jealous of GB News success. If you have a look at GB News presenters just two are MP's one of whom is a Tory, and that's what really annoys small minded bitter lefties. How do you classify costing (losing) over £40 million year a success? Are you quoting from its largely willing print acquisition target, the Telegraph? Commercially, GBN is a cash sink hole that’ll likely eventually need help from outside… Unlike the BBC we are not forced to fund GB News, so however much the channel loses or makes is irrelevant to the viewer, you certainly appear to be more concerned than me. The only reason, and it is the only reason, the left wing media led by the BBC are campaigning to shut down GB News is because it's the fastest growing news platform in the country, and the reason it's the fastest growing news platform is because unlike the BBC it's not woke, and it's not left wing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 19, 2024 11:08:10 GMT
Because perish the thought that alternative opinions might be heard.🙄 With just a minimum of depth of thought you would understand that my approach is against the indoctrination of people moving them further to the right of politics. i.e. closer to the dangers of Right-wing extremism. And if the Far Right actually existed outside of the left wing imagination then you might have a point.
But as it doesn't, you don't.
As usual.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 19, 2024 11:11:46 GMT
Absolute rubbish. If Farage had been de-banked by Coutts/NatWest because he no longer met the banks criteria for holding an account, then NatWest Chief Exec Dame Alison Rose and Coutts CEO Peter Flavell would not have lost their jobs. IIRC, they lost their jobs for how they allowed private information into the public domain, NOT for closing an account that no longer met the requirements. All The Best Again, rubbish. Rose leaked Farage's information (to the BBC who then snitched lol) Flavell did not. However, ultimately the reason they lost their jobs is because they decided to de-bank Farage because they didn't like his politics. This has all been said, may I suggest you make use of the search button. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Mar 19, 2024 11:26:45 GMT
IIRC, they lost their jobs for how they allowed private information into the public domain, NOT for closing an account that no longer met the requirements. All The Best Again, rubbish. Rose leaked Farage's information (to the BBC who then snitched lol) Flavell did not. However, ultimately the reason they lost their jobs is because they decided to de-bank Farage because they didn't like his politics. This has all been said, may I suggest you make use of the search button. Well, just spent some time this morning reading around this issue. Farage's account had fallen below the threshold required to hold the account he held; but had done so significantly before he was de-banked because of it. So, on that basis Coutts had grounds to close his account but it could not reasonably be seen to be the primary reason for the account closure. However, it does seem that the primary reason for the de-banking was because Farage's political views were at odds with the corporate standpoint of the bank on those issues. Given that "freedom of political expression" can not be discriminated against then Coutts were wrong to de-bank Farage. My initial understanding of this issue was, therefore, erroneous. Learn something every day. All The Best |
|
