|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 15, 2024 0:04:17 GMT
Christianity is becoming irrelevant . Islam is not . Welby knows it . Perhaps this is why those in power are perverting and corrupting humanity in the western world. The Marxists would do the same thing to destroy civilisation and bring about their thing. Welby's thing looks to be hardline Islam whilst relying on the moron Left to cheer it on. The moron Left will be disposed of in the long run, so I guess, as tyrants go, Welby is playing it smart. Mr paranoid What is paranoia? Paranoia is the irrational and persistent feeling that people are 'out to get you' or that you are the subject of persistent, intrusive attention by others. This unfounded mistrust of others can make it difficult for a person with paranoia to function socially or have close relationships Yep that fits you B4 |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 15, 2024 0:29:33 GMT
Not a bad little number peddling something you don't really believe in... It means that the annual pay of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, will remain at £85,070 for the next year. The salary of a diocesan bishop will stick at £46,180, and the benchmark stipend for a parish vicar will stay at £27,000. So what he's paid by his Employer the C.OF. E |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2024 6:33:35 GMT
Do you honestly believe Islam gives a damn about some race-baiting gender-bender lefty?
I understand, with you being a lefty, that you have to follow orders and support Islam whilst shitting all over the working class white people who told you to fk off over the years (you had to rely on Blairism and corporate globalist backing to get New Labour elected), but is it possible for you to be honest about it? If you think I ever relied on New Labour, you clearly lack the insight to do anything other than talk out of your arse. An orifice pf choice which behaps explains why you talk so much shit. To be fair, I honestly couldn't care less what you stand for, especially not whilst you're relying on the puppet Tony Benn, who did nothing for Socialism other than to talk about it. Seriously, he was such a poor politician that he only went over to the Left to exploit it as a career move. Thatcher thought the world of him. Sure, he's a poster boy for some, where even his own son mocked his legacy, but not really somebody to take too seriously.
Now that we've addressed that, let's look at your "I post lies and smears and demand that everyone believes me" attitude. Sure, many lefties like to disassociate themselves from Blair, just as they did from Adolf Hitler after the game. But I am sure you'd vote for him again and rely on his third way socialism so you can bash people online whilst feeling smug. As for insight, let's refresh our memories and address the drivel I actually responded to from you:
It was only you who was relying on racism and anti-gay prejudices out of the blue. Perhaps you could go to a mosque and lecture them on the virtues of homosexuality? It's also no surprise that a Blairite/Starmer semi-literate came along to post a few ad-hominem attacks to try and shut down a perfectly valid discussion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2024 9:48:49 GMT
If you think I ever relied on New Labour, you clearly lack the insight to do anything other than talk out of your arse. An orifice pf choice which behaps explains why you talk so much shit. To be fair, I honestly couldn't care less what you stand for, especially not whilst you're relying on the puppet Tony Benn, who did nothing for Socialism other than to talk about it. Seriously, he was such a poor politician that he only went over to the Left to exploit it as a career move. Thatcher thought the world of him. Sure, he's a poster boy for some, where even his own son mocked his legacy, but not really somebody to take too seriously.
Now that we've addressed that, let's look at your "I post lies and smears and demand that everyone believes me" attitude. Sure, many lefties like to disassociate themselves from Blair, just as they did from Adolf Hitler after the game. But I am sure you'd vote for him again and rely on his third way socialism so you can bash people online whilst feeling smug. As for insight, let's refresh our memories and address the drivel I actually responded to from you:
It was only you who was relying on racism and anti-gay prejudices out of the blue. Perhaps you could go to a mosque and lecture them on the virtues of homosexuality? It's also no surprise that a Blairite/Starmer semi-literate came along to post a few ad-hominem attacks to try and shut down a perfectly valid discussion.
If you think I am a Blairite or Starmer supporter you are merely betraying your ignorance about me. And I am one of the most literate, if occasionally excessively verbose, ones around here, but you wouldn't know that because you are constantly inventing false realities about other forum members and the wider world. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2024 10:12:07 GMT
Perhaps this is why those in power are perverting and corrupting humanity in the western world. The Marxists would do the same thing to destroy civilisation and bring about their thing. Welby's thing looks to be hardline Islam whilst relying on the moron Left to cheer it on. The moron Left will be disposed of in the long run, so I guess, as tyrants go, Welby is playing it smart. Mr paranoid What is paranoia? Paranoia is the irrational and persistent feeling that people are 'out to get you' or that you are the subject of persistent, intrusive attention by others. This unfounded mistrust of others can make it difficult for a person with paranoia to function socially or have close relationships Yep that fits you B4 Is this your way of supporting the Archbishop, TTL? Mr Welby doesn't speak for me. I wonder who he does actually speak for. It's not God, because supporting Islam goes against scripture. Maybe he just spouts stuff to go along with the crowd. Which seems to be what the CofE wants to do. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 15, 2024 10:20:39 GMT
Lefties love right wingers ….if they are Muslims.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 15, 2024 10:22:05 GMT
Mr paranoid What is paranoia? Paranoia is the irrational and persistent feeling that people are 'out to get you' or that you are the subject of persistent, intrusive attention by others. This unfounded mistrust of others can make it difficult for a person with paranoia to function socially or have close relationships Yep that fits you B4 Is this your way of supporting the Archbishop, TTL? Mr Welby doesn't speak for me. I wonder who he does actually speak for. It's not God, because supporting Islam goes against scripture. Maybe he just spouts stuff to go along with the crowd. Which seems to be what the CofE wants to do. I wouldn't be surprised when he's kicked in to the long grass he doesn't convert to Islam, he seems to promote Islam more than Christianity. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2024 11:03:54 GMT
To be fair, I honestly couldn't care less what you stand for, especially not whilst you're relying on the puppet Tony Benn, who did nothing for Socialism other than to talk about it. Seriously, he was such a poor politician that he only went over to the Left to exploit it as a career move. Thatcher thought the world of him. Sure, he's a poster boy for some, where even his own son mocked his legacy, but not really somebody to take too seriously.
Now that we've addressed that, let's look at your "I post lies and smears and demand that everyone believes me" attitude. Sure, many lefties like to disassociate themselves from Blair, just as they did from Adolf Hitler after the game. But I am sure you'd vote for him again and rely on his third way socialism so you can bash people online whilst feeling smug. As for insight, let's refresh our memories and address the drivel I actually responded to from you:
It was only you who was relying on racism and anti-gay prejudices out of the blue. Perhaps you could go to a mosque and lecture them on the virtues of homosexuality? It's also no surprise that a Blairite/Starmer semi-literate came along to post a few ad-hominem attacks to try and shut down a perfectly valid discussion.
If you think I am a Blairite or Starmer supporter you are merely betraying your ignorance about me. And I am one of the most literate, if occasionally excessively verbose, ones around here, but you wouldn't know that because you are constantly inventing false realities about other forum members and the wider world. I'm basing it on you flaming/trolling the thread with the support of some self-appointed Starmer supporting Blairite who struggles with English and follows you around.
As for inventing false realities, whatever that means in your world, that is exactly what I pulled you up for - your intolerance and hypocrisy let loose by you flaming and trolling the thread whilst smearing everyone who is posting on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 15, 2024 11:03:56 GMT
I posted abnormalities, as with "babies born with an abnormal feature, characteristic, or occurrence". i.e. the proof that the human pro-creation system is far from perfect. For your self-limited point of view it would not be possible for nature to create a male or a female to feel they are in the wrong body. Yet it happens, and has apparently been happening for thousands of years. How do you define female homosexuality when it is usual for one female to take on the manly side while the other takes on the feminine side? Ditto with homosexual males. Some homosexuals have been prepared to die in order to be who they feel they actually are. Not one word of your post refutes the point that a biological male is not a woman . Homosexuals are not trans gender. Strawman arguments and anomalies should define the group is all you have and they have been refuted time and time again. Back to the sandpit with you . The term biological in this case refers to living humans, that is all living humans including those with biological defects. There is an obvious biological connection between those in a homosexual partnership and those who take the step into a full trans gender decision. Which I have already made apparent by my question in my earlier post. It seems that you ignore the question because your mind is not open enough to enter that area of thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 15, 2024 11:08:27 GMT
If you think I ever relied on New Labour, you clearly lack the insight to do anything other than talk out of your arse. An orifice pf choice which behaps explains why you talk so much shit. To be fair, I honestly couldn't care less what you stand for, especially not whilst you're relying on the puppet Tony Benn, who did nothing for Socialism other than to talk about it. Seriously, he was such a poor politician that he only went over to the Left to exploit it as a career move. Thatcher thought the world of him. Sure, he's a poster boy for some, where even his own son mocked his legacy, but not really somebody to take too seriously.
Now that we've addressed that, let's look at your "I post lies and smears and demand that everyone believes me" attitude. Sure, many lefties like to disassociate themselves from Blair, just as they did from Adolf Hitler after the game. But I am sure you'd vote for him again and rely on his third way socialism so you can bash people online whilst feeling smug. As for insight, let's refresh our memories and address the drivel I actually responded to from you:
It was only you who was relying on racism and anti-gay prejudices out of the blue. Perhaps you could go to a mosque and lecture them on the virtues of homosexuality? It's also no surprise that a Blairite/Starmer semi-literate came along to post a few ad-hominem attacks to try and shut down a perfectly valid discussion.
Well you sometimes give the impression of being an illiterate ill-informed right-winger. That is not meant as an ad-hominem. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 15, 2024 11:13:27 GMT
Not one word of your post refutes the point that a biological male is not a woman . Homosexuals are not trans gender. Strawman arguments and anomalies should define the group is all you have and they have been refuted time and time again. Back to the sandpit with you . The term biological in this case refers to living humans, that is all living humans including those with biological defects. There is an obvious biological connection between those in a homosexual partnership and those who take the step into a full trans gender decision. Which I have already made apparent by my question in my earlier post. It seems that you ignore the question because your mind is not open enough to enter that area of thinking. Of course it refers to living persons you pillock. Dead people tend not to be living. Homosexuality and the trans sex delusion are not linked and have nothing to do with each other . You are ,as usual, posting crap . |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2024 11:23:52 GMT
The term biological in this case refers to living humans, that is all living humans including those with biological defects. There is an obvious biological connection between those in a homosexual partnership and those who take the step into a full trans gender decision. Which I have already made apparent by my question in my earlier post. It seems that you ignore the question because your mind is not open enough to enter that area of thinking. Of course it refers to living persons you pillock. Dead people tend not to be living. Homosexuality and the trans sex delusion are not linked and have nothing to do with each other . You are ,as usual, posting crap . They can't even differentiate between race and religion, and have been taught that flaming and trolling makes an argument. Why wouldn't they shamelessly tell lies for fun? It's also why they're for authoritarian big government and the total regulation of speech. I have no doubt See2 believes he's doing Blair's work. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 15, 2024 11:34:24 GMT
Of course it refers to living persons you pillock. Dead people tend not to be living. Homosexuality and the trans sex delusion are not linked and have nothing to do with each other . You are ,as usual, posting crap . They can't even differentiate between race and religion, and have been taught that flaming and trolling makes an argument. Why wouldn't they shamelessly tell lies for fun? It's also why they're for authoritarian big government and the total regulation of speech. I have no doubt See2 believes he's doing Blair's work. I really don’t know what believes but I do know he posts crap. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Mar 15, 2024 11:36:56 GMT
Of course but it can also consider a problem in logic and the logic that it will apply will be based on many factors including, but by no means limited to, the effect of a course of action on its body, its relations bodies and others if they can help the first two. Some of these judgements may have feelings, for various reasons, attached which will colour the outcome of the judgement but it may still be a decision partly based on logic and not on hormonal initiated feelings. As an extreme example is the self sacrifice to save others is a logical judgement made in part by feelings as the judgement has to be made, is there no other choice and what will be the outcome. The hormonal part of course will depend on other survival factors affecting that specific line of antecedents and that specific individual. An extreme example of self sacrifice to save others is an emotional / hormonal decision. Not really comparable but a suicide bomber is the victim of their emotional system. Yes, feeling are picked up by the thinking logical brain, BUT there is a huge problem in the exchange, in that the logical brain does what it can with the incoming information but it definitely does not get it right all the time. As an easily recognised example of something that happens all to often is, take an example of two individuals in a heated argument based upon their different opinions, the actual outcome of which affects no one or anything, yet it can end up in physical violence. The reason it could end up in violence is because the non-logical sensory system is producing hormones that are treating the situation as it being a threatening one. One of the human problems is that too many people think they live in their logical brain because right or wrong the logical system usually makes the final choice. IMO few people are who they were born to be. Hormones make so many of the changes. I disagree most people are generally who they are born to be because all their programming including hormone release is to a certain extent preset. It is why in the main like father like son is a truism as is a girl realises she is turning into her mother. The whole situation of evolution is that the following generation can deal with the environmental problems in broadly the same way that their antecedents did. Most people have the evolutionary package to deal with the circumstances their parents did as well as a bit extra or a bit less ready for changes in the environment. Hormones make changes but those changes are as defined by evolution. In your fight example above that is exactly what evolution has produced in that situations that threaten, and loss of an argument is in real terms a threat, have set responses. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 15, 2024 11:39:39 GMT
...There is an obvious biological connection between those in a homosexual partnership and those who take the step into a full trans gender decision. Which I have already made apparent by my question in my earlier post. Since you are apparently unable to tell the difference between gay and trans I would suggest that your opinions on either are wholly worthless. |
|
