|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 14, 2024 13:37:30 GMT
No, its not a "Straw Man" or a slippery slope, it is what it is, and it is a direct attempt to demonize and villify an entire religion or faith. This is no different to how it all began for Jewish people in the 1930s. Some of the excuses behind it may be different, but many are no different. THEY are "taking over", THEY "are trying to change our culture", THEY "are trying to force their religion on us" THEY are "trying to force their laws on us", "Its a cult", "they hate this country" In the 1930s the Jews were blamed for our economic woes, in Germany the Jews were depicted as been Anti German, and whilst Aryan Germans were depicted as poor, and suffering from the Great Depression, the Jews were depicted as been fat, rich, greedy, making money from the poor. The kinds of outrageous, false claims as spewed out by Lee Anderson can easily be compared to what politicians were saying in the 1930s about Jews, and Anderson and everyone like him are formenting hate and division, and its potentially explosive. “When the straw man is pointed out just keep spouting the strawman. “PP1 Lefties politics for dummies |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 14, 2024 15:29:19 GMT
As I posted , understandable as I'm obviously too close to reality and I have tried not to be personal You've spectacularly failed to justify your argument. Faking autism well enough to gain a bogus diagnosis might, just might be possible for an adult who has done extensive research and is a phenomenally good actor. The question you haven't addressed is why somebody would try to blag their way into membership of a demographic group that factual evidence shows is hugely disadvantaged? It would be like a rich person trying to con their way into poverty. The next question is how exactly a two or three year old child with speech development delay manages to dupe trained and qualified clinicians? It seems that you've blundered into a subject you know very little about and are now trying to extract yourself and minimise your embarrassment. I've not failed, far from it I've highlighted the jumping on the bandwagon trend I've highlighted the ''observation and background'' from a niche psychologist who agrees with the alleged sufferer that their lack of friends at school and dislike of parties can earn the label of autistic You've dodged the issue as to why or how you jumped on the trendy AST bandwagon - you claim not to play the victim yet say that your employers have had to make ''minor'' adjustments for you . I've asked what these ''minor'' adjustments are - silence from you. I've asked how work knows that you ''need'' such adjustments unless you have specifically demanded them - silence from you . I've asked if someone with spots or a sore knee can have the same ''minor' adjustments - silence from you . |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 14, 2024 15:33:24 GMT
Many public facilities cater for mothers who want to feed or change their infants in privacy... Well that needs to go. I mean, what about the "Chestfeeders"?
It's just opening up the same old debate again.
Let's just have "Person" facilities and have done with it.
or issue them with incontinence pants |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 14, 2024 15:44:35 GMT
If it’s a non issue , why are the left fighting so hard for it , why is the trans lobby powerful enough to shout down JK Rowling snd why is denying it edging towards a ‘ hate crime ‘. Yes you do have to accept trans women as men and you should not have to . Trans women are men with a delusion . Society should accommodate people with delusions but not to the point of joining in on the delusion . You have turned this topic upside down, it is not "the left" who are fighting hard on it, it's the other way around, the "populist right" who are continually trying to make it an issue, for me personally I couldnt give a toss about Trans men or Trans women, its just not a political issue to me. The NHS is a political issue, as is rising homelesness, poverty, the economy, defence, but for me trans people are a fact of life, I accept them for who they are. So you disagree with the single sex hospital wards and see no problem with a biological man in a nightie in a bed next to a woman ? The guidance outlines a possible real-life scenario setting out a situation where a patient "explains she didn't expect to be sharing the ward with a man and points to the bed opposite".
The document states that nurses are told to "reiterate" to any female patient who raises such concerns "that the ward is indeed female only and that there are no men present".
"Ultimately it may be the complainant who is required to be removed."
The guidance adds: www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/scottish-news/fury-scots-health-board-says-28710585
|
|
