|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 5, 2024 23:12:59 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - link |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 5, 2024 23:30:29 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - linkIf he posed a fret with a suicide vest I think the SAS acted lawfully. But I ask the Question what was the SAS Doing in Syria. The leader there was a oppressive tyrant Who killed Millions of his own people who were a different sect of Islam. As well Has political opponents. He a other Middle East fruit Cake like Sadamm was. If any one should be Brought to trail is the Government i think under Cameron at the time. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 5, 2024 23:39:58 GMT
The five SAS soldiers deserve a medal.
Reads like military chiefs are trying to distance themselves from their predecessors and look more transparent over war crimes. So, they'll happily throw their men under a bus for a virtuous pat on the head by the woke council.
Makes you proud to be British, eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 6, 2024 0:08:16 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - linkSee here
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 6, 2024 0:20:57 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - linkSee here
Apologies BvL, didn't see it. I hate duplicating threads if there were no responses I would delete the OP. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 6, 2024 0:25:35 GMT
Apologies BvL, didn't see it. I hate duplicating threads if there were no responses I would delete the OP. Edit, ref the link you posted, Mercer is a disgrace. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Mar 6, 2024 0:52:59 GMT
Apologies BvL, didn't see it. I hate duplicating threads if there were no responses I would delete the OP. Edit, ref the link you posted, Mercer is a disgrace. My link has a good few snippets of evidence in the hearing. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 6, 2024 1:14:44 GMT
Edit, ref the link you posted, Mercer is a disgrace. My link has a good few snippets of evidence in the hearing. Yes I know. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Mar 6, 2024 1:33:31 GMT
Britain’s Special Forces have been deployed operationally in at least 19 overseas countries in the past decade, new analysis reveals, raising questions over the degree of transparency and democratic consent these shadowy units operate under. The countries where there have been active operations are: Algeria, Estonia, France, Iran/Oman (Strait of Hormuz), Iraq, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mediterranean (Cyprus), Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Russia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Ukraine, and Yemen.
This section outlines the extent of UKSF’s operations in Syria.
+++
The Syrian civil war developed out of the country’s Arab Spring protests in March 2011, with fighting becoming widespread by July. According to his memoir (For the Record, p279), David Cameron was pushing other countries to deploy their special forces in Syria as early as January 2012. By August, it was reported from multiple sources that teams from SAS and SBS were ‘understood to be based in the neighbouring state of Jordan, slipping into Syria on missions’’.
According to European and Jordanian sources in 2013, training of rebels had been going on for a year and was focused on senior Syrian army officers. Unconfirmed reports in French and American media suggested that UKSF had been assisting Syrian rebels in Turkey and Lebanon as early as 2011. The former British ambassador Peter Ford would later tell a parliamentary enquiry that “moderate” groups among the armed opposition was “largely a figment of the imagination”.
In August 2013, MPs rejected a proposal for military action in Syria after reports of chemical weapon attacks by the Assad regime. David Cameron became the first prime minister to lose a parliamentary vote on military action since Lord North in 1782 when parliament voted to stop fighting in the American War of Independence.
It was a illegal intervention By Cameron.
Like I said the Government Should face Charges
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 6, 2024 8:07:38 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - linkThe old saying is very apt, " Lions led by Donkeys " IMHO they are the best Special Services in the world |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2024 10:43:32 GMT
Lefties will of course cheer largely because they're clueless. But I kid you not, I listened to an item about this earlier and I could have punched the monitor, I had a walk around the garden to calm down. Why do top brass continually refuse to support their own troops? The SAS are arguably the best special forces in the world and bearing that in mind it's fair to say they would have been operating in a difficult situation of which people reading this could never in a million years begin to understand but will I'm sure be quick to judge - linkIf he posed a fret with a suicide vest I think the SAS acted lawfully. But I ask the Question what was the SAS Doing in Syria. The leader there was a oppressive tyrant Who killed Millions of his own people who were a different sect of Islam. As well Has political opponents. He a other Middle East fruit Cake like Sadamm was. If any one should be Brought to trail is the Government i think under Cameron at the time. It's complicated. We are still trying to work out who is the enemy of our friends and who is the friend of our enemies in Syria. |
|
|
|
Post by morayloon on Mar 6, 2024 14:40:32 GMT
The SAS are just a group of trained killers. I think their mo. is to kill first, and there is little doubt about that. I provide the murder of three IRA operatives in Gibraltar 36 years ago, on March 6 1988 as a case in point. There is no argument about the three belonging to the terrorist organisation, but the two men, and one woman were unarmed, despite the UK Government claiming otherwise. An accusation was also made, subsequently retracted, that there was a bomb in their car. The SAS personnel simply carried out what they are trained to do. But it was so wrong.
That example plus the Afghanistan murders strongly suggests that those killings are but the mere tip of the iceberg.
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Mar 6, 2024 14:48:52 GMT
This sentence speaks a thousand words >> "According to Special Air Service sources, a primed suicide vest was found nearby but the suspect was not wearing it when killed"
|
|
|
|
Post by piglet on Mar 6, 2024 15:06:48 GMT
Of course the SAS are trained killers Morayloon, every country has its equivalent, the best were the SS, not only were they merciless they believed in what they were doing which made them unstoppable. Do you believe in defending Britain Morayloon?,
I do.
When the SAS go into a situation the right and wrongs have already been addressed by higher ups, the only thought is to get the job done, in whatever way. To highlight the problem, many captured soldiers in surrendering then proceed to murder their capturer.
In times gone by. If they are there, they look like terrorists, behave like such, and are planning something then rat atat tat. Countless lives have been lost by bleeding heart a ss holes. Im sure there are squads in Russia testing Putins security, from around the world.
Many wars have been avoided by someone doing in a dangerous man before it, i call it it, gets power. Then again, the left are masters of chaos, and want it. I hope it is the tip of the iceberg, then there are many bad boys rotting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 6, 2024 15:28:17 GMT
If you want someone arrested, send in the Police - if you want someone stopped, sent in the Army.
|
|
