What's Sunak going to say about "Islamophobia"

This is the same Left wing argument whenever muslims are discussed. The shout goes up that not ALL muslims are terrorists/rapists etc etc - usually when no one has said that ALL muslims are anything. However muslims do share a common ideology - far more closely than, say, Christians do - because islam is far more prescriptive than most other religions. And we have a pretty good idea what muslims think because of all the polls that have been done on their opinions.

For example nearly 50% of muslims want to have sharia law in the UK and many muslims are married according to sharia law (in England) which gives women virtually no rights. Als nearly 50% of muslims believe that violence is justifiable to impose their own laws. A large minority of muslims felt that the 7/7 bombings (where 52 people were killed and many hundreds seriously injured) were regarded as justified by a large minority of muslims.

The common statement that it's only a tiny minority of muslims are involved in terrorism is true in that only a tiny minority are involved in the acts of terrorism but there's a very large minority who fully support terrorism - the terrorists couldn't do it without the support of many people. When Hamas murdered about 1400 people in Israel on Oct 7th there were mass celebrations among the civilian population of Gaza. The terrorists were feted. Likewise when Salah Abdeslam committed the atrocity in Paris he simply went to Belgium and lived (openly) in Molenbeek for months. Everyone knew who he was but no one reported him - he was a hero. 

So I get a bit fed up with the politicians prefacing any slight criticism of muslims with the statement "Most musilms are peaceful law-abiding people". No they're not.    

I think that's really a matter of opinion. While there are similarities there are also significant differences.

While Christianity tends to draw a line between what it calls the secular / temporal realms and the spiritual, Islam sees itself as the proper authority for both. Part of the problem is semantic - ie what Islam sees as 'religion' or a 'religious matter' is not what the Christian west sees. Islam views itself (in our terms) as both a  religion and a law wielding nation who is set in opposition to (competition with?) other nations.

If you don't see this difference as significant, perhaps you don't share Mr Anderson's view that large amounts of Islamic immigration and the consequent penetration of Islamic believers into our institutions should be of any concern to us non Muslims.

Islam says “ Hold my beer “.

If you concede that white privilege is false and white people owe nothing to the descendants of slaves then I might consider your point but until then ….British Muslims belong to the same cult with the same indoctrination as the bombers . 

I personally have created or contributed NOTHING towards the society that Britain now is, that is down to history (The British Empire) and successive governments.

Society is what it is, there are people of immigrant background living amongst us, just as there has always been throughout history, you talk about "touchpaper" as though most of our citizens of immigrant or Muslim background are criminals, terrorists or here to force their way of life upon the majority, which of course is wholly untrue.

It is the far Right who ARE the problem, because a very large percentage of us white, British people have no issue with living alongside black people, Muslims or people of immigrant background, it is YOU who has the problem. 

Western "Christian" powers have recently tried to infiltrate and change Islamic countries' culture. I well remember the west celebrating the so callled Arab Spring as a victory for western christian culture. Not to mention centuries of missionaries sellung christianity to the natives...and still do.

Christianity has ALWAYS set out to conquer and control, from Peter till now.

I was reading that very thing by hysterical lefties at the time and I sure I will read more when Labour is elected.
Lefties seem to compete with each other in attributing more and more extreme definitions of people  who do not agree with them anyway.
Starting from ‘ right wing ‘ to ‘ far right wing’ moving on to ‘ extreme right wing’ on then onto evoking Goose stepping Germans in the 1930s . 
I think you are a bit behind the curve there.