|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 11, 2024 18:31:12 GMT
But it wasn't one piece of cake consumed during an illegal gathering, but multiple infringements of the law against gatherings by — and this is the priceless bit — by those who made the law... Personally, I find it absolutely mind boggling that people who for months demanded the prime minister should resign, were also of the opinion that beer & curry for up to 30 people during lockdown was fine. Double standards? No, it's breath taking hypocrisy. I absolutely guarantee, if Boris had been caught with up to 30 other people all scoffing beer & curry during lockdown, the very first people to demand he should resign would have been Starmer and Rayner. And you know it. But Boris was caught on multiple occasions... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:33:12 GMT
Wasn't the private address the candidate's office? Why wouldn't a working team have planned breaks? Having a schedule and knowing where people can be contacted is all part of an efficient organising staff's job... Like I said pat a fucking private address....They had alreeady planned to go back to their hotel the be fed and watered. And what fucking scedhule stated these lying fuckers had to work til 11 or more at night? We were in lockdown FFS.. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 11, 2024 18:33:41 GMT
Personally, I find it absolutely mind boggling that people who for months demanded the prime minister should resign, were also of the opinion that beer & curry for up to 30 people during lockdown was fine. Double standards? No, it's breath taking hypocrisy. I absolutely guarantee, if Boris had been caught with up to 30 other people all scoffing beer & curry during lockdown, the very first people to demand he should resign would have been Starmer and Rayner. And you know it. But Boris was caught on multiple occasions... I see. So one beer & curry night during lockdown was OK?.. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:35:27 GMT
Personally, I find it absolutely mind boggling that people who for months demanded the prime minister should resign, were also of the opinion that beer & curry for up to 30 people during lockdown was fine. Double standards? No, it's breath taking hypocrisy. I absolutely guarantee, if Boris had been caught with up to 30 other people all scoffing beer & curry during lockdown, the very first people to demand he should resign would have been Starmer and Rayner. And you know it. But Boris was caught on multiple occasions... Caught by who? FFS why didn't the MET officers guarding no 10 never report any wrong doings? |
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 11, 2024 18:36:58 GMT
In the worst possible scenario, if Angela Rayner did in fact fail to declare a profit of £48,500 on the sale of a property that was not her home. Her liabilities to HMRC in terms of Capital Gains Tax would amount to about £1500 ( One Thousand, Five Hundred Pounds ).
However, as someone who has sold property which was not my home, I know that if I had made valuable improvements to that property, I can offset those improvements against CGT, and with a relatively small liability that Angela Rayner would owe ( around fifteen hundred quid ) it wouldn't take much to offset such an amount.
As with every other poster, I do not know what it is that Angela Rayner is not telling the media, but I find it hard to believe that she would have attempted to swindle HMRC, cover it up, and then tell a lie that she sought legal advice and is convinced that she has done nothing wrong.
I also do not believe that Labour Party officials who have ( according to them ) seen the legal advice, would not act in the interests of the party if they thought she had done wrong.
Rayner is not a Billionaire, or a Millionaire, she's hard faced and tough, she refuses to publish her tax returns simply because some Right wing dirt rag says she has to, or because the Tory "Attack Dogs" wont let go, because they think they smell blood.
There are several perfectly legal ways in which Rayner might not ever have been liable to pay the piddling amount of fifteen hundred quid in Capital Gains Tax, and I am sure that - IF - the police or HMRC want to know the fine detail, she will tell them.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:39:43 GMT
In the worst possible scenario, if Angela Rayner did in fact fail to declare a profit of £48,500 on the sale of a property that was not her home. Her liabilities to HMRC in terms of Capital Gains Tax would amount to about £1500 ( One Thousand, Five Hundred Pounds ). However, as someone who has sold property which was not my home, I know that if I had made valuable improvements to that property, I can offset those improvements against CGT, and with a relatively small liability that Angela Rayner would owe ( around fifteen hundred quid ) it wouldn't take much to offset such an amount. As with every other poster, I do not know what it is that Angela Rayner is not telling the media, but I find it hard to believe that she would have attempted to swindle HMRC, cover it up, and then tell a lie that she sought legal advice and is convinced that she has done nothing wrong. I also do not believe that Labour Party officials who have ( according to them ) seen the legal advice, would not act in the interests of the party if they thought she had done wrong. Rayner is not a Billionaire, or a Millionaire, she's hard faced and tough, she refuses to publish her tax returns simply because some Right wing dirt rag says she has to, or because the Tory "Attack Dogs" wont let go, because they think they smell blood. There are several perfectly legal ways in which Rayner might not ever have been liable to pay the piddling amount of fifteen hundred quid in Capital Gains Tax, and I am sure that - IF - the police or HMRC want to know the fine detail, she will tell them. What the fuck does rayners wealth have anything to do with her lies. fiddles?..FFS she wouldn't even cut it in the real world so would either starve, steal or visit foodbanks. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 11, 2024 18:40:00 GMT
But Boris was caught on multiple occasions... I see. So one beer & curry night during lockdown was OK?.. Just as the one No.10 photographed wine and cheese gathering in the No.10 garden on 15 May 2020 was judged to be a working event and within the rules... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:42:13 GMT
I see. So one beer & curry night during lockdown was OK?.. Just as the one No.10 photographed wine and cheese gathering in the No.10 garden on 15 May 2020 was judged to be a working event and within the rules... So fucking what? Smarmer was filmed with a fucking pint in his hand at his illegal pissup? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:45:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Apr 11, 2024 18:46:17 GMT
Just as the one No.10 photographed wine and cheese gathering in the No.10 garden on 15 May 2020 was judged to be a working event and within the rules... So fucking what? Smarmer was filmed with a fucking pint in his hand at his illegal pissup? Starmer was not filmed with a pint in his hand, he was filmed with a bottle of beer in his hand, which was not breaking any rule or law, as concluded TWICE by the police. But you people cant / wont accept the outcome |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 11, 2024 18:49:03 GMT
But Boris was caught on multiple occasions... Caught by who? FFS why didn't the MET officers guarding no 10 never report any wrong doings? At the time, the officer on the door couldn't tell the difference between what was a legitimate working session and what was a social gathering. Remember, Cressida Dick was in charge of the Met... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:52:05 GMT
So fucking what? Smarmer was filmed with a fucking pint in his hand at his illegal pissup? Starmer was not filmed with a pint in his hand, he was filmed with a bottle of beer in his hand, which was not breaking any rule or law, as concluded TWICE by the police. But you people cant / wont accept the outcome Poor old fiddles reduced to arguing over the size of the beer that starmer had in his hand at his illegal pissup... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:53:46 GMT
Caught by who? FFS why didn't the MET officers guarding no 10 never report any wrong doings? and what was a social gathering. Remember, Cressida Dick was in charge of the Met... Total BOLLOCKS...,And who gives a fuck about what dick had to say? She was slung out for lying FFS.. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 11, 2024 18:56:32 GMT
So fucking what? Smarmer was filmed with a fucking pint in his hand at his illegal pissup? Starmer was not filmed with a pint in his hand, he was filmed with a bottle of beer in his hand, which was not breaking any rule or law, as concluded TWICE by the police. But you people cant / wont accept the outcome LOL, you're a star. Perhaps not the brightest, but a star nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 18:57:09 GMT
Seven scandals on Cressida Dick’s watch......
|
|
