|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 11, 2024 11:06:26 GMT
High ranking police were also at Starmer beergate pissup, even more reason there had to be a coverup. Yep the very same crime commisioner who starmer helped to get to those giddy heights...But of course no rats to be smelt there of course...Jimmy fixed that for kneel-a-a-lot For goodness sake please be man enough to provide the evidence of your claims and insinuations, or just stop posting garbage. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 11, 2024 11:10:46 GMT
Oh she should definitely provide any and all evidence asked for by a relevant authority, competent to assess the alleged wrongs she has allegedly committed. Does that mean spilling everything to a rabid Tory sympathiser press-rabble? No. She is beholden to The Law, Parliament and her Constituents. Everyone else has the right to fuck off and leave her alone, me included. All The Best LOL - Left Wing hypocrisy at its finest...  What were the circumstances preceding her request? Without such information your post is Right-Wing hypocrisy at its finest. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Apr 11, 2024 11:18:16 GMT
LOL - Left Wing hypocrisy at its finest... What were the circumstances preceding her request? Without such information your post is Right-Wing hypocrisy at its finest. Under what circumstances should politicians release financial and legal information? Or is ProVeritas correct when he says they should only provide evidence to the relevant authority - everyone else can fuck off? |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 11, 2024 11:26:38 GMT
Yup. ^ I haven’t seen one leftie on here say that she should be transparent to dispel this . It’s as if they think the accusation might be correct. Oh she should definitely provide any and all evidence asked for by a relevant authority, competent to assess the alleged wrongs she has allegedly committed. Does that mean spilling everything to a rabid Tory sympathiser press-rabble? No. She is beholden to The Law, Parliament and her Constituents. Everyone else has the right to fuck off and leave her alone, me included. All The Best But you think that it's OK for her to demand that the financials of various Conservative politicians (some links already given) should be published because she says so in the name of ''transparency''? This isn't double standards hypocrisy on her part? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 11, 2024 11:59:50 GMT
Nope. It looks like that from anyone reading your accusations of ‘ far right’ at people who are centre right . When did I last refer to any anyone at centre-right as being 'far-right'? I’m not scrolling back for you , you old fart but I’ll remind you the next time you do it ♥️ |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 11, 2024 12:02:14 GMT
Fine. Rayner should tell us what advice she took and make all the details needed to refute the suspicions open to the public . In your opinion that is. But of course if she is innocent she has every right to ignore the political garbage thrown at her, and just get on with her life. Judging by the level of attacks on Rayner there is every reason to believe that CGT people have investigated her position, why wouldn't they? Of course it’s my opinion you idiot .Do you think I would post your opinion? She has every right to hide and others have every right to question why she is hiding . |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 12:10:56 GMT
Fine. Rayner should tell us what advice she took and make all the details needed to refute the suspicions open to the public . In your opinion that is. But of course if she is innocent she has every right to ignore the political garbage thrown at her, and just get on with her life. Judging by the level of attacks on Rayner there is every reason to believe that CGT people have investigated her position, why wouldn't they? You do know we are all witnessing your rank hypocrisy, Ange is entitled to keep her private financial affairs to herself because it's not in the public interest, while on the other hand the same Ange is demanding the Tories make their private financial affairs public .... LOL I don't even think there's a phrase suitable for that kind of double standard. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 11, 2024 12:12:51 GMT
Perhaps that is because both the police and an independent inquiry found Boris Johnson to be guilty According to the lefties on here and most lefties out there, Boris was guilty as charged before the police even spoke to him, you have a short selective memory, don't you. Photographs later used in evidence might have helped people make up their minds and prompt the official investigations.
Faced it, the subpostmasters wouldn't have got even this far without public opinion pushing for a proper investigation...
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 12:20:58 GMT
According to the lefties on here and most lefties out there, Boris was guilty as charged before the police even spoke to him, you have a short selective memory, don't you. Photographs later used in evidence might have helped people make up their minds and prompt the official investigations.
Faced it, the subpostmasters wouldn't have got even this far without public opinion pushing for a proper investigation...
How many times do you have to post before the penny drops with a poster?
I said BEFORE any official police contact or any official inquiry in to Boris Johnson the lefties and their kangaroo court had already convicted him over a picture, yet Starmer was snapped from a window swigging a bottle of beer while also hosting a beer and curry night during lockdown ........ But Starmer was innocent because he said it was legal because it was a 'working' meeting ........ LOL if you believe that you'll believe anything .... just in case you've missed it I'm selling timeshare plots on Mars, don't miss out, cracking deals.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 11, 2024 12:21:26 GMT
In your opinion that is. But of course if she is innocent she has every right to ignore the political garbage thrown at her, and just get on with her life. Judging by the level of attacks on Rayner there is every reason to believe that CGT people have investigated her position, why wouldn't they? You do know we are all witnessing your rank hypocrisy, Ange is entitled to keep her private financial affairs to herself because it's not in the public interest, while on the other hand the same Ange is demanding the Tories make their private financial affairs public .... LOL I don't even think there's a phrase suitable for that kind of double standard. Perhaps when she claims for moat clearing or duck house renovation from the public purse, we might accuse her of fiddling. But until HMRC, the Police, the Electoral Commission respond to calls for Rayner to be investigated, it's all remains just accusation, hearsay and smear... |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 11, 2024 12:27:57 GMT
Fine. Rayner should tell us what advice she took and make all the details needed to refute the suspicions open to the public . In your opinion that is. But of course if she is innocent she has every right to ignore the political garbage thrown at her, and just get on with her life. Judging by the level of attacks on Rayner there is every reason to believe that CGT people have investigated her position, why wouldn't they? CGT people? You mean HMRC (most of whom are still WFH) who open an enquiry and write to the taxpayer and their advisor giving a month or three to respond , then take another month or six to respond to any reply or chase up a lack of reply , assessments may be issued which can be challenged prolonging enquiries for months/years (Adrian Chiles tax challenge has been going on for over 10 years) Your level of complete ignorance on taxation knows no limits |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 11, 2024 12:30:54 GMT
You keep yelling "biased", yet you never explain what this bias is supposed to be. Exactly what is my bias? Bias against tax dodgers? No I don't so don't lie about me. Your single minded repeated attacks on her expose your bias. You never seem to question the validity of the so called evidence against her, and take your opinions as if they were facts. You have adopted a judge and jury approach. Your conclusions might be correct, I don't know, I just totally dislike you nasty insinuating clearly very biased approach. So I prefer to laugh at them rather than to be aggravated by them. Lie about you? You literally cannot write a post without using the word "bias", including this reply lol. Again, what is my bias? I am biased because I think she is lying??? That isn't a bias lol. You are laughable, you won't even say that you believe her side of the story lol. I know you won't have read it because apparently you suffer temporary blindness when left-wing politicians are held to account... the Mail on Sunday published posts from RAYNER'S SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS in which we can clearly see she lived with her husband during the time period in question lol. In one post she is pictured in her husbands home with the caption "it is good to be home" and she has her two cats on her knee. I'll make this simple for you... if she is telling the truth she lives in one house, and her husband, brother, kids and her two cats live in another house. You would have to be the world's biggest idiot to believe that lol. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2024 13:20:35 GMT
Does Gray or PIE ring any bells fiddles? Because it fucking should do.. Most of your posts are a string of either abuse, insults, fowl language, conspiracy theories and non-stories without any credibility. If you have anything to post which would be debateable or interesting, preferably something which is from the world of reality, then I would engage. I have seen all the conspiracy theories and stories about Paedophile rings linked to various politicians, including prominent Conservative ones, and so far, no one has come up with a shred of evidence. My own former MP (Leon Brittan) was the target of this shite. It is a long thread about a rather poultry matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 11, 2024 13:28:55 GMT
Most of your posts are a string of either abuse, insults, fowl language, conspiracy theories and non-stories without any credibility. If you have anything to post which would be debateable or interesting, preferably something which is from the world of reality, then I would engage. I have seen all the conspiracy theories and stories about Paedophile rings linked to various politicians, including prominent Conservative ones, and so far, no one has come up with a shred of evidence. My own former MP (Leon Brittan) was the target of this shite. It is a long thread about a rather poultry matter. Like those of Boris Johnson and partygate, almost 10 different long threads going at the same time, the lefties couldn't get enough of it, same as the media, it was driving people nuts. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 11, 2024 13:35:39 GMT
It is a long thread about a rather poultry matter. Like those of Boris Johnson and partygate, almost 10 different long threads going at the same time, the lefties couldn't get enough of it, same as the media, it was driving people nuts. Not to mention the lefy hypocrisy when cummins went darkside and he became the man of the hour... |
|
