|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 11:18:25 GMT
I'm afraid she is toast, The Mail on Sunday have trawled through her social media to prove she lived with her husband. Labour has cancelled all the social media ads she features in and she is back in hiding. Looks like we will get 10-15 years of an un-challenged Starmer now, which on the bright side will be more stable for the country, just not much Socialism going on lol. Stable? Starmer is more prone to flip-flopping because of perceived public opinion than any MP in my lifetime. He has no political principles for which he is prepared to stand on a line and say "no more"; he will sacrifice them all just to keep his snout in the trough. Fuck me, I'd rather another Tory government than 10 years of Starmer, and you have no idea how much I despise the current Tory party. All The Best Oh dear, another one frightened of the possibility of a second very successful Center-Left government. You will have plenty to moan about as Starmer, if elected, struggles with making the UK ready for war in Europe while also dealing with the wide spread affect of AI. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 11:21:22 GMT
No I don't so don't lie about me. Your single minded repeated attacks on her expose your bias. You never seem to question the validity of the so called evidence against her, and take your opinions as if they were facts. You have adopted a judge and jury approach. Your conclusions might be correct, I don't know, I just totally dislike you nasty insinuating clearly very biased approach. So I prefer to laugh at them rather than to be aggravated by them. I don't keep yelling biased. You posts expose your bias. Am I the only one who sees the anomaly here? All The Best I don't keep 'yelling'. Don't be silly, you are way too biased to even begin to judge normality. |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 10, 2024 11:21:55 GMT
Stable? Starmer is more prone to flip-flopping because of perceived public opinion than any MP in my lifetime. He has no political principles for which he is prepared to stand on a line and say "no more"; he will sacrifice them all just to keep his snout in the trough. Fuck me, I'd rather another Tory government than 10 years of Starmer, and you have no idea how much I despise the current Tory party. All The Best Oh dear, another one frightened of the possibility of a second very successful Center-Left government. You will have plenty to moan about as Starmer, if elected, struggles with making the UK ready for war in Europe while also dealing with the wide spread affect of AI. Oh, I'd love a Centre-Left or even a Left-Centre Government. Starmer is Centre-Right though, just like your other bromance Tony Blair. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 10, 2024 11:22:44 GMT
I don't keep yelling biased. You posts expose your bias. Am I the only one who sees the anomaly here? All The Best I don't keep 'yelling'. Don't be silly, you are way too biased to even begin to judge normality. There you go again, using the word "biased" when you only just claimed you don't use it all the time. Cognitive Dissonance? All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 10, 2024 11:52:08 GMT
You keep yelling "biased", yet you never explain what this bias is supposed to be. Exactly what is my bias? Bias against tax dodgers? No I don't so don't lie about me. Your single minded repeated attacks on her expose your bias. You never seem to question the validity of the so called evidence against her, and take your opinions as if they were facts. You have adopted a judge and jury approach. Your conclusions might be correct, I don't know, I just totally dislike you nasty insinuating clearly very biased approach. So I prefer to laugh at them rather than to be aggravated by them. The validity of evidence? She stated that she did not pay any cgt on the sale of the council house she bought at a discount. She married Mr Ang and claims (and has been backed up by Labour) that she lived for 5 years in her ex council house a mile away from Mr Ang's also bought at a discount ex council house. She states (and is backed by Labour incl Lammy at the weekend who stated that many UK married couples have 2 houses and live in one each )that her and Mr Ang kept 2 houses and that when she sold hers no cgt was payable and none was paid . This is in spite of the fact that tax legislation states that a married couple (unless legally separated) can only claim one property as their primary residence for zero cgt tax purposes (I've previously linked the legislation which was acknowledged by you so don't pretend you haven't seen it and go asking for links yet again) There are also more questions under election law and council house discount rules but the tax law is clear on the house - it would not be a case of tax avoidance , it would be tax evasion |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 11:54:13 GMT
Oh, I'd love a Centre-Left or even a Left-Centre Government. Starmer is Centre-Right though, just like your other bromance Tony Blair. All The Best You are entitled to your misguided opinion.  |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 11:57:57 GMT
No I don't so don't lie about me. Your single minded repeated attacks on her expose your bias. You never seem to question the validity of the so called evidence against her, and take your opinions as if they were facts. You have adopted a judge and jury approach. Your conclusions might be correct, I don't know, I just totally dislike you nasty insinuating clearly very biased approach. So I prefer to laugh at them rather than to be aggravated by them. The validity of evidence? She stated that she did not pay any cgt on the sale of the council house she bought at a discount. She married Mr Ang and claims (and has been backed up by Labour) that she lived for 5 years in her ex council house a mile away from Mr Ang's also bought at a discount ex council house. She states (and is backed by Labour incl Lammy at the weekend who stated that many UK married couples have 2 houses and live in one each )that her and Mr Ang kept 2 houses and that when she sold hers no cgt was payable and none was paid . This is in spite of the fact that tax legislation states that a married couple (unless legally separated) can only claim one property as their primary residence for zero cgt tax purposes (I've previously linked the legislation which was acknowledged by you so don't pretend you haven't seen it and go asking for links yet again) There are also more questions under election law and council house discount rules but the tax law is clear on the house - it would not be a case of tax avoidance , it would be tax evasion If you have evidence of her guilt, then report it to the Police and to the relevant Tax authority. Don't be whinging at me. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 12:00:12 GMT
I don't keep 'yelling'. Don't be silly, you are way too biased to even begin to judge normality. There you go again, using the word "biased" when you only just claimed you don't use it all the time. Cognitive Dissonance? All The Best I claimed I didn't keep YELLING it. It looks like you are losing it. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 10, 2024 12:20:54 GMT
The validity of evidence? She stated that she did not pay any cgt on the sale of the council house she bought at a discount. She married Mr Ang and claims (and has been backed up by Labour) that she lived for 5 years in her ex council house a mile away from Mr Ang's also bought at a discount ex council house. She states (and is backed by Labour incl Lammy at the weekend who stated that many UK married couples have 2 houses and live in one each )that her and Mr Ang kept 2 houses and that when she sold hers no cgt was payable and none was paid . This is in spite of the fact that tax legislation states that a married couple (unless legally separated) can only claim one property as their primary residence for zero cgt tax purposes (I've previously linked the legislation which was acknowledged by you so don't pretend you haven't seen it and go asking for links yet again) There are also more questions under election law and council house discount rules but the tax law is clear on the house - it would not be a case of tax avoidance , it would be tax evasion If you have evidence of her guilt, then report it to the Police and to the relevant Tax authority. Don't be whinging at me. You go through life tunnel visioned and oblivious to all evidence of lefty hypocrisy if your posts are to be believed and are not simply those of a lefty wind up merchant incapable of following any debate. Nadim Zahawi resigned after settling an HMRC tax enquiry and was hypocritically attacked by the ginger growler prior to resignation . Why does she (and you) think she is above the law? She told BBC Breakfast: “The fact that Nadhim hasn’t been out on the airwaves explaining himself, to me, adds insult to injury, especially given that he called this smears at the time and sent legal letters to those that asked questions legitimately about it.
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/21/nadhim-zahawi-position-tory-chair-untenable-labour
And in yet another blatant example of the ginger growler's hypocrisy she demanded that a Conservative candidate's financials should be published inthe interests of ''transparency'' Angela Rayner has been accused of “hypocrisy” after it emerged she demanded a Tory candidate publish their tax return, while refusing to publish her own.
Labour’s deputy leader wrote to the Conservative chairman during a by-election in 2021 to ask her to publish tax details. This is despite the fact that she has so-far refused to publish her own tax return amid mounting questions over her own financial affairs.
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/10/angela-rayner-starmer-tax-council-house-row-sunak-tory/
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 10, 2024 12:39:55 GMT
I would have thought that was obvious. Dyed in the wool lefties are diametrically opposed to common sense. Fortunately most of them grow out of it. I often refuse to debate, or get tired of debate when the opposition makes it obvious they are clearly totally blinded by their bias. No kidding. I'll alert the media. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 10, 2024 12:41:49 GMT
I often refuse to debate, or get tired of debate when the opposition makes it obvious they are clearly totally blinded by their bias. No kidding. I'll alert the media. LOL .... |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 10, 2024 15:15:49 GMT
I've no idea why anyone engages with . He never debates, he just accuses anyone who disagrees with him of being "Biased" or "Far right". He's an utter imbecile.We can't expect anything more from a lefty... |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 18:51:19 GMT
If you have evidence of her guilt, then report it to the Police and to the relevant Tax authority. Don't be whinging at me. You go through life tunnel visioned and oblivious to all evidence of lefty hypocrisy if your posts are to be believed and are not simply those of a lefty wind up merchant incapable of following any debate. Nadim Zahawi resigned after settling an HMRC tax enquiry and was hypocritically attacked by the ginger growler prior to resignation . Why does she (and you) think she is above the law? She told BBC Breakfast: “The fact that Nadhim hasn’t been out on the airwaves explaining himself, to me, adds insult to injury, especially given that he called this smears at the time and sent legal letters to those that asked questions legitimately about it.
www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/21/nadhim-zahawi-position-tory-chair-untenable-labour
And in yet another blatant example of the ginger growler's hypocrisy she demanded that a Conservative candidate's financials should be published inthe interests of ''transparency'' Angela Rayner has been accused of “hypocrisy” after it emerged she demanded a Tory candidate publish their tax return, while refusing to publish her own.
Labour’s deputy leader wrote to the Conservative chairman during a by-election in 2021 to ask her to publish tax details. This is despite the fact that she has so-far refused to publish her own tax return amid mounting questions over her own financial affairs.
www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/10/angela-rayner-starmer-tax-council-house-row-sunak-tory/
Still nothing more on Rayner in the Torygraph, do you really think that if they had anything positive on Rayner they would not have posted it? Meanwhile, from the Torygraph. --"The Prime Minister took aim at the pair as he faced questions over his handling of the William Wragg honeytrap scandal. "Mr. Wragg voluntarily resigned the Tory whip on Tuesday and Mr. Sunak was asked on Wednesday morning why he had not taken action against him after the MP admitted involvement in the scandal."That's what you do if you're guilty. If Rayner is guilty that is what she should do, if she is not guilty then its as you were Angela. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 19:01:46 GMT
I don't keep 'yelling'. Don't be silly, you are way too biased to even begin to judge normality. There you go again, using the word "biased" when you only just claimed you don't use it all the time. Cognitive Dissonance? All The Best I often use the word biased when it is appropriate, so stop whinging. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 10, 2024 19:17:58 GMT
If you have evidence of her guilt, then report it to the Police and to the relevant Tax authority. Don't be whinging at me. Gremlins in the system. |
|
